Connect with us

Local

Ugly testimony at Md. marriage hearing

Opponents invoke pedophilia, incest while denouncing bill

Published

on

Sen. Brian Frosh and Sen. Lisa Gladden (Blade photo by Michael Key)

ANNAPOLIS, Md. ā€”Ā As many as 300 supporters and opponents of a bill to legalize same-sex marriage in Maryland packed the halls of a State Senate office building in Annapolis Tuesday while several dozen witnesses testified on both sides of the issue.

The Democratic-controlled Judicial Proceedings Committee, which conducted a hearing on the bill, was expected to approve the measure and send it to the full Senate within the next week or two.

A majority of the members of the 11-person committee are co-sponsors or supporters of the bill, the Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Protection Act.

Most political observers believe supporters have the votes to pass the bill in the Senate and the House of Delegates. Gov. Martin Oā€™Malley has said he would sign the bill.

But opponents, led by Maggie Gallagher, chair of the National Organization for Marriage, said they remain hopeful that supporters would fall short of obtaining the 24 votes needed to pass the bill in the Senate or the 29 votes needed to stop a Senate filibuster.

ā€œMarriage is the union of husband and wife for a reason,ā€ Gallagher said in her testimony. ā€œThese are the only unions that can make new life and connect children in love to their mom and dad ā€¦ If Maryland adopts this radical new view of marriage, it will have consequences,ā€ she said.

Many of the witnesses testifying against the bill ā€” including ministers, an orthodox rabbi, and two Roman Catholic priests ā€” picked up on Gallagherā€™s view that procreation is the cornerstone of marriage. They said changing the definition of marriage to include same-sex couples would have a detrimental impact on families and society.

An equal number of witnesses, including a Catholic nun and Catholic lay leaders, two reform rabbis and at least a half-dozen Protestant ministers, both black and white, disputed those assertions, saying they believe same-sex unions strengthen rather than harm the family. Many of the witnesses backing the bill identified themselves as people of faith.

ā€œMy God loves everyone,ā€ said Elbridge James, a lobbyist for the NAACP and director the Maryland Black Family Alliance.

ā€œMy God did not make a mistake,ā€ he said. ā€œAnd so if you were gay, my God did not make a mistake. If you were lesbian my God did not make a mistake. If you were transgender, my God did not make a mistake. And tonight, when I go home to my wife, nothing will deter me from loving my wife ā€” certainly not if thereā€™s a bill that protects gays, protects lesbians or protects the transgender community.ā€

Several of Marylandā€™s gay elected officials testified in favor of the bill. Among them was Sen. Richard Madaleno (D-Montgomery County), a co-sponsor of the bill who has been a longtime advocate for marriage equality in the state. Others included Chevy Chase, Md., Mayor David Loveland andĀ Howard County Register of Wills Byron Macfarlane.

Among Republicans testifying in support of the bill was Sen. Allan Kittleman (R-Howard & Carroll Counties). Kittleman, the former Senate minority leader, initially planned to introduce a civil unions bill as a possible alternate measure to the marriage bill. Two weeks ago, he dropped those plans and announced his enthusiastic support for the marriage measure.

ā€œI stand here as a strong Republican,ā€ he told the committee, adding that he believes marriage equality is in full keeping with Republican principals of individual freedom.

Sen. Brian Frosh (D-Montgomery County), chair of the committee, said at the start of the hearing that more than 140 people signed up to testify.

Their names, organizational affiliation and information on whether they were for or against the bill werenā€™t immediately available because the committee did not release a witness list on the day of the hearing.

In a procedure unlike the equally packed hearing for a same-sex marriage bill approved by the D.C. City Council last year, the Judicial Proceedings Committee in Maryland required witnesses to sign up in person to testify on the morning of the hearing, preventing the committee from compiling an advance witness list and releasing it to the media.

Based on the testimony delivered during the day, it appeared that the witnesses were about equally divided between supporters and opponents of the bill. As Frosh and Sen. Lisa Gladen (D-Baltimore City), the committeeā€™s vice chair, calledĀ witnesses to testify, many were not present, indicating that a significant number chose not to wait their turn to speak at a hearing that lasted more than six hours.

Lisa Polyak, a board member and spokesperson for Equality Maryland, the statewide LGBT organization that coordinated testimony in support of the bill, said the group lined up about 48 supporting witnesses. She said others supporting the bill, including a number of same-sex couples, came on their own.

ā€œWe were extremely gratified for all of the families that came out, all of our community partners, and all of the clergy that came out to speak their truth and support us,ā€ she said. ā€œI donā€™t think we could have had a better diversity of representation.ā€

Among those testifying was Polyakā€™s and her partner, Gita Deaneā€™s daughter, 14-year-old Maya Deane-Polyak, a freshman at Baltimoreā€™s Bryan Mawr High School.

ā€œMy momsā€™ first concern has always been my sister and I,ā€ said Maya. ā€œThey make sure our every need is met, whether it is helping us with homework, driving us to a friendā€™s house or merely just being there to cheer us up when we are sad ā€” they do it all and even more.ā€

Noting that she has witnessed first-hand examples of how her two moms encounter discrimination because they canā€™t marry in Maryland, she urged the committee to promptly approve the marriage bill.

ā€œSo I ask you to please consider, consider the fact that you have the power to change my familyā€™s life when you make your decision,ā€ she said. ā€œI want our moms to be married. You have the power to make that happen.ā€

Many of the witnesses opposing the bill said broadening marriage to include same-sex couples would weaken the family structure and harm children. Several said children of same-sex parents donā€™t do as well in school and show greater signs of emotional problems compared to kids of opposite-sex, married parents. LGBT activists have said those assertions are not supported by impartial studies.

Austin Nimocks, senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative litigation group that challenges same-sex marriage laws throughout the country, testified that restricting marriage to opposite-sex couples insures that children are raised by a ā€œstable family.ā€

He said ā€œresponsible procreationā€ is a key reason why Maryland and other states should not legalize marriage for same-sex couples. By pushing to ā€œredefineā€ marriage to include gay and lesbian couples ā€œyou are telling people that mothers and fathers donā€™t matter,ā€ he told the committee.

In response to questions by committee member Jamie Raskin (D-Montgomery County), a co-sponsor of the marriage bill, Nimocks acknowledged that some same-sex couples may make good parents, saying ā€œyou can find individual circumstances that go against a general rule.ā€

But other witnesses opposing the bill said there could be no exceptions to their religious-based belief that child rearing by same-sex parentsĀ is always harmful to children, both psychologically and spiritually.

ā€œThat union of our parents was a sacred right granted to them by almighty God,ā€ said Timonium, Md., resident Gerard Selby. ā€œGodā€™s design for the human race was that it be procreated by the union of a man and a woman.ā€

He added, ā€œWhere do we draw the lines? What comes next? If a man loses his wife to a premature death, shouldnā€™t he be allowed to marry his daughter, or son, or both?

Leroy Swales (Blade photo by Michael Key)

Leroy Swales, an Oxon Hill, Md., resident who testified last year against the D.C. same-sex marriage bill, told the committee Tuesday that approval of the bill, among other things, would result in Marylandā€™s elementary schools using the book ā€œHeather Has Two Mommies,ā€ which he called a ā€œpedophile book,ā€ as a teaching aid for students.

Saying that homosexuality is related to an ā€œelectrical imbalance of the brain,ā€ he called on the committee to use ā€œscienceā€ and biblical scriptures as justification for defeating the bill.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

District of Columbia

Reenactment of 1965 gay rights protest at White House set for April 17

Event to mark 60thĀ anniversary of historic picketing

Published

on

Among those expected to participate in the April 17 White House reenactment picketing is longtime D.C. LGBTQ rights advocate Paul Kuntzler, who is shown here participating in a similar reenactment event in front of the White House one year ago. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

D.C.ā€™s Rainbow History Project is inviting members of the local LGBTQ community and its supporters to participate in a reenactment of what it calls the historic 1965 first gay rights protest outside the White House.

The event is scheduled to begin at 4 p.m. Thursday, April 17 on the sidewalk in front of the White House.

In a statement, Rainbow History Project says the 1965 protest was organized by local gay rights pioneers Frank Kameny and Lilli Vincenz on behalf of the Mattachine Society of Washington, one of D.C.ā€™s first gay rights groups that Kameny co-founded in the early 1960s.

ā€œLed by Dr. Kameny and Dr. Vincenz, picketers demanded action on the Mattachine Societyā€™s four major issues: the exclusion of homosexuals from Federal employment; the punitive policies of the U.S. Military; blanket denial of security clearances to gay people; and government refusal to meet with the LGBTQ community,ā€ the statement says.  

The statement referred to the titles of Kameny and Vincenz in connection with their academic doctorate degrees  

ā€œAlthough Dr. Kameny died in 2011, and Dr. Vincenz in 2023, Rainbow History Project and its all-volunteer corps will picket in their honor and demonstrate there is a new generation of young activists ready to take up their signs and their fight for equal rights for all LGBTQ people,ā€ the statement says.

Among those expected to participate in the April 17 White House reenactment picketing is longtime D.C. LGBTQ rights advocate Paul Kuntzler, who is the last known survivor of the 1965 White House gay rights protest. Kuntzler was expected to carry a picket sign similar to the one he carried in 1965.

In its research on the 1965 gay White House protest, Rainbow History Project learned of a letter that Kameny sent to then President Lyndon B. Johnson outlining the demands of the White House protesters.

ā€œWe ask, Mr. President, for what all American citizens ā€“ singly and collectively ā€“ have the right to ask,ā€ the Kameny letter states. ā€œThat our problems be given fair, unbiased considerationā€¦consideration in which we, ourselves, are allowed to participate actively and are invited to do so.ā€

The RHP statement says the group ā€œwill carry replicas of the original protest signs and hand out literature explaining the picket to passersby and tourists.ā€ Ā Ā 

Continue Reading

Maryland

FreeState Justice: Transgender activist ā€˜hijackedā€™ Mooreā€™s Transgender Day of Visibility event

Maryland Commission on LGBTQIA+ Affairs describes Lee Blinderā€™s comments as ā€˜call to actionā€™

Published

on

Lee Blinder, founding executive director of Trans Maryland, speaks to Maryland Gov. Wes Moore during a ceremony for the International Day for Transgender Visibility. Blinder called out the governor for not backing up his words with action.Ā (Photo by Jessica Gallagher for the Baltimore Banner)

FreeState Justice on April 11 released a statement criticizing the way that Trans Maryland Executive Director Lee Blinder treated Gov. Wes Moore during a Transgender Day of Visibility event.

FreeState Justice was extremely disappointed with the criticisms of Moore on the Transgender Day of Visibility, saying it was ā€œhijacked by public hostilityā€ by Blinder. The Baltimore Banner reported how Blinder ā€œlaid out how the Democratic governor has let down transgender Marylanders by not putting money in the budget and not backing needed policy changes.ā€

The Washington Blade interviewed Blinder after the March 31 event.

ā€œThe intention of what I shared is to show to the governor that this is a community in distress. You know, we are in a real state of emergency for the trans community and there are very few opportunities that the community has to share this directly with the governor.ā€ Blinder told the Blade. ā€œWeā€™re really grateful to the governor for everything that heā€™s done in the past for this community, but the circumstances have changed and we really need to see very specific actions taken in order to ensure this community has the ability to exist in public space.ā€

FreeState Justice said Moore did not deserve such criticisms during the event and added in a Blade oped it is ā€œtime for new leadership on the Maryland LGBTQIA+ Commission. Leadership that values and prioritizes coalition over conflict. Leadership that invites feedback and shares power. Leadership that understands how Annapolis operates, how budgets are constructed, and how community victories are won.ā€

ā€œWeā€™re not saying donā€™t challenge power. Weā€™re saying do it with purpose. Do it with facts. Do it with a strategy. If youā€™re going to call yourself a leader in this movement, show us the policy platform. Show us the data. Show us the budget line. Show us the work,ā€ wrote FreeState Justice.

The Maryland Commission on LGBTQIA+ Affairs has met to address FreeState Justiceā€™s statements. 

ā€œDuring the Transgender Day of Visibility ceremony at the State House, the commissionā€™s chair offered remarks reflecting the real fears, concerns, and hopes of the trans community. These remarks were not a call-out, but a call to action,ā€ the commission said in their call to action statement it sent to the Blade. ā€œThe chairā€™s words echoed the thousands of voices weā€™ve heard across the state through phone calls, emails, and messages on social media to our staff, commissioners, and their affiliated organizations.ā€

The statement outlines what the call to action entails, addressing what the commission found to be the most pressing issues for transgender Marylanders. They include a lack of dedicated funding, barriers to affirming healthcare, housing insecurity and homelessness, discrimination in education and employment, and escalating violence, harassment, and hate.

ā€œWe remain deeply committed to working in partnership with the Moore-Miller administration, the General Assembly, state agencies, nonprofit organizations, and community partners to ensure LGBTQIA+ Marylanders are seen, protected, and supported in policy, budget, and in practice,ā€ reads the statement.

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

Final push to raise funds, fill D.C. hotels as WorldPride nears

ā€˜We would have liked to see the city fully sold out at this pointā€™

Published

on

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser budgeted $5 million for WorldPride, which was approved by the Council. Capital Pride Alliance is now working to raise an additional $2 million. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

A final push to raise money and fill D.C. hotel rooms is underway with WorldPride 2025 just over a month away.

The Capital Pride Alliance, the D.C.-based group thatā€™s organizing WorldPride 2025 in the nationā€™s capital thatā€™s scheduled to take place May 17-June 8 launched what it says is one of several fundraising campaigns in a full-page ad in the Washington Post on April 1.

With a large headline declaring, ā€œHate Is No Joke,ā€ a message in the ad states, ā€œDecades of progress in human rights are under coordinated, systematic attack. Today itā€™s focused on gender, sexual orientation, and race. But whatā€™s next?ā€

The message then states, ā€œTake Action. Take a stand. Donate now at WorldPrideDC.org/give.ā€

That site says its goal is to raise $2 million. As of April 14, the site says $12,041 had been raised from 69 donors.

In response to a request by the Washington Blade for comment on what prompted this particular fundraising campaign, Capital Pride Alliance released a statement saying the campaign was part of its ongoing effort to promote WorldPride and its multiple events.

ā€œThe Hate Is No Joke campaign is one of multiple fundraising campaigns that have been planned around the lead-up to WorldPride 2025,ā€ the statement says. ā€œSimilar to CPAā€™s annual Giving Tuesday campaign and the current Taste of Pride citywide initiative, this campaign is intended to raise awareness for and funds to support WorldPride.ā€

The statement says the ā€œHate Is No Jokeā€ campaign is being led by the local event planning company Linder Global Events, which D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser retained to work with Capital Pride Alliance in organizing WorldPride 2025.

Capital Pride Alliance Executive Director Ryan Bos told the Blade last month that CPA had set up a budget of between $15 million and $20 million for WorldPride 2025, with much of the funding coming from corporate donors. At the request of MayorĀ Bowser, the D.C. Council approved $5 million in city funding for WorldPride.

ā€œAnd like we do every year for an organization like ours, which is event based, we do our best every year to come under budget,ā€ Bos said in referring to the cityā€™s annual Capital Pride celebration and events. ā€œSo, we are doing our best to save whenever we can and to ensure that we have a safe and successful WorldPride,ā€ he said.

In its statement responding to the Bladeā€™s inquiry about the Hate Is No Joke fundraising campaign, Capital Pride Alliance said it has learned through the international LGBTQ advocacy organization InterPride, which plays a role in organizing WorldPride events, that visitors from at least 20 countries were expected to come to D.C. for WorldPride 2025.

Among those countries were Canada, Mexico, and several others from Europe, Asia, and Africa, including Uganda and Zimbabwe, as well as India, Spain, Italy, United Kingdom, China, and Thailand.

Elliott Ferguson, president and CEO of Destination D.C., an organization that promotes tourism, visitation, and events in D.C., including events like WorldPride, said he is seeing signs that hotel reservations are increasing from visitors planning to come to D.C. for WorldPride. But he said he cannot predict whether as many as 2 million or more visitors will come as WorldPride organizers had predicted earlier this year.

At Capital Pride Allianceā€™s suggestion, Ferguson spoke with the Blade to address the question of whether the controversial statements and policies of President Donald Trump on world trade issues and tariffs involving longtime U.S. allies like Canada and Mexico as well as the Trump administrationā€™s hostile policies targeting the transgender community would prompt people, especially those from foreign countries, to choose not to come to D.C. for WorldPride.

ā€œIā€™m not sure,ā€ Ferguson told the Blade in an interview. ā€œYou know, I think thatā€™s the gray area in terms of how many people will come,ā€ he said.

ā€œBut reservations are being made. Weā€™re seeing more of an uptick,ā€ he told the Blade. ā€œAnd we remain optimistic as WorldPride organizers and Capital Pride organizers are really focusing on the celebration of the community thatā€™s happening in the city,ā€ he said.

Ferguson said he and Destination D.C. were joining WorldPride organizers in putting out the message that if people disagree with the Trump administrationā€™s policies on LGBTQ-related issues or any other issues, they should turn out for WorldPride to protest those policies.

Capital Pride officials have pointed out that among the many events planned for WorldPride is a national LGBTQ rights march on Washington that will begin at the Lincoln Memorial and travel to the U.S. Capitol.

ā€œThereā€™s a lot of consternation and concern about a lot of issues that have been brought to our attention by a lot of international travelers, including those that were looking at coming for WorldPride,ā€ Ferguson said.

ā€œWhat weā€™ve said to them is, you know, coming to WorldPride from a global perspective focusing on freedom of speech and First Amendment rights here in the U.S. is a huge part of why you should be here,ā€ he added. 

ā€œSo, as we talk to hotels, we would have liked to see the city fully sold out at this point,ā€ he said. ā€œBut we are seeing momentum in terms of reservations being made and people coming to Washington.ā€ 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular