Connect with us

Health

City cautious on medical marijuana

Published

on

The Whitman-Walker Clinic has joined D.C. Council member David Catania (I-At Large) and city Attorney General Peter NicklesĀ in expressing caution over how and when the city should implement a 1998 law that legalizes medical marijuana in the District.

Congress last week ended its nine-year ban on allowing the law to take effect when it approved a D.C. appropriations bill that didn’t include a rider blocking the law. District voters approved the law in a 1998 ballot initiative that passed with 69 percent of the vote.

ā€œMore than anything else, this is regarded as a very favorable turn of events,ā€ said Thomas Kujawski, an official with the National Association for People With AIDS.

Kujawski said recent studies have shown that marijuana is especially helpful in alleviating side effects from powerful antiretroviral drugs used by AIDS patients, such as nausea and a painful nerve condition called peripheral neuropathy.

Catania, who chairs the Council’s Committee on Health, has said he favors legal use of marijuana for medical purposes, but believes the Council and the city’s Department of Health should carefully craft implementing rules before rushingĀ to put the law into effect.

Nickles told the Washington Post last week that he has asked his staff to review whether the nine-year lag time since voters approved the law would prevent it from withstanding a legal challenge.

On a separate issue, Nickles and D.C. Council Chair Vincent Gray (D-At Large) said the city’s Home Rule charter requires the city to submit the law to Congress for a required review of 30 legislative days, just as all new D.C. laws must be subjected to such a review.

But D.C. Congressional Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), disputed that view, saying Congress’s decision to lift its hold on the law amounted to a tacit approval, and the 30-day review would be an unnecessary redundancy. Congress blocked the law, known as Ballot Initiative 59, before the city had a chance to submit it for the normal congressional review.

Other city hall observers noted that while Gray and Norton hash out whether to send the law to Capitol Hill for congressional review, city officials were quietly expressing concern over whether the city government or private non-profit groups should take the lead in cultivating and distributing marijuana for medical purposes.

According to the text of Initiative 59, ā€œAll seriously ill individuals have the right to obtain and use marijuana for medical purposesā€ when a licensed physician determines it’s necessary for treatment and prescribes its use.

The law says that residents of the city ā€œmay organize and operate non-for-profit corporations for the purpose of cultivating, purchasing, and distributing marijuana exclusively for the medical use of patients.ā€ It says the director of the D.C. Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs shall arrange for such non-profit corporations to be exempt from taxes that for-profit corporations normally must pay.

When asked if the Whitman-Walker Clinic, which serves as the city’s largest treatment facility for people with HIV and AIDS, would consider prescribing medical marijuana for its patients, Clinic spokesperson Chip Lewis told DC Agenda that it was too soon to make such a decision.

ā€œWhitman-Walker Clinic believes that everyone living with HIV/AIDS or other chronic conditions should have access to legal medications under a physician’s care,ā€ Lewis said. ā€œIf this law does take effect, we will have to do some thoughtful and careful planning, looking at current standards of care, before we could implement any program.ā€

Currently, medical marijuana is legal in Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington state.

Kujawski pointed to a study reported in the February 2007 edition of the medical journal Neurology, which found that smoked marijuana was ā€œwell toleratedā€ and ā€œeffectively relieved chronic neuropathic pain from HIV-associated sensory neuropathy.ā€

He said the condition typically causes tingling or burning sensations in the limbs of AIDS patients. Experts aren’t sure if the condition is caused by HIV itself or is brought on by various antiretroviral drugs used to treat HIV.

ā€œAnything that is going to result in improved health outcomes for individuals and/or anything that’s going to help support their adherence to their medical treatment regimens, we’re highly supportive of,ā€ he said.

D.C. gay and AIDS activist Wayne Turner and his late domestic partner, Steve Michael, who died of AIDS months before Initiative 59 came before voters, have been credited with starting efforts to place the issue on the ballot. Turner was among the lead campaign organizers for the initiative.

He praised the Democratic controlled Congress for removing its hold on the law and has called on the city government to put the law in place as soon as possible.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Health

Choose UĀ ambassadors share lived experiences with HIV, personal reflections, and insights

Published

on

The Choose U World AIDS Day panel brought together three longtime advocates living with HIV to talk about care, stigma, and what living with HIV over the long-term means to them. The conversation featured Jahlove Serrano, Joyce Belton, and Andrew Nichols, who have each lived with HIV for more than 20 years. News is Out hosted the event in partnership with Gilead Sciences.

ā€œCo-created with community representatives from around the world, Choose U is comprised of inspiring examples of how the outlook for aging with HIV has dramatically changed,ā€ Gilead shared in the recent launch of the program. ā€œBy focusing on the real-world experiences of people in different circumstances, Choose U spotlights individuals prioritizing starting and staying on HIV treatment, self-care, and overall strategies to help them lead healthier lives.ā€

The Choose U ambassadors opened with a clear message: Lived experience drives understanding.

Each panelist talked through the decisions, relationships, and periods of uncertainty that shaped their HIV care. They also described their approaches to HIV treatment and adherence, including the importance of staying on treatment to help lower the risk of HIV drug resistance. They reflected on the shifts they have seen in HIV treatment over the decades, the value of honest conversations with providers, and how staying engaged in care and on HIV treatment helped them lead longer, healthier lives.

The panel discussed U=U, which stands for ā€œUndetectable equals Untransmittable.ā€ Undetectable means there is so little virus in the blood that a lab test can’t measure it. Research shows that taking HIV treatment as prescribed, and getting to and staying undetectable, prevents HIV from spreading through sex.

The panelists also spoke about the emotional side of living with HIV over the long-term and the stigma they have faced. Joyce described a personal moment when her pastor visited her in the hospital and how that experience began her work educating her church community about HIV.

Jahlove talked about how his biological family reacted to his diagnosis. ā€œWhen I disclosed my status, they told me that I put a shame on the family,ā€ said Jahlove. When he shared his status with his peers, they responded with support, which gave him a sense of empowerment.

Andrew, a professional therapist, described how he has experienced stigma in dating and in his workplace, and why he turns to therapy for guidance. ā€œTherapy has really helped me rebuild my confidence and realize my self-worth has to come from me,ā€ said Andrew. ā€œThen after that, I can help with the greater community.ā€

The panel closed with a message for others living with HIV: They encouraged viewers to start and stay engaged in HIV treatment and care, ask questions, and rely on supportive networks. Their stories show how starting and staying on treatment over the long-term, community, and affirmation can shape well-being.

A recording of the full 30-minute event is now available on YouTube, which you can access here.

Continue Reading

Health

The harsh truth about HIV phobia in gay dating

HIV and stigma remain baked into queer dating culture

Published

on

(Photo by Val Chaparro for Uncloseted Media)

Uncloseted Media published this article on Dec. 9.

This story was produced with the support of MISTR, a telehealth platform offering free online access to PrEP, DoxyPEP, STI testing, Hepatitis C testing and treatment and long-term HIV care across the U.S. MISTR did not have any editorial input into the content of this story.

By SAM DONNDELINGER | In his room, 19-year-old Cody Nester toggles between Grindr profiles on his phone.

As he senses chemistry with a match, he knows he has to flag something that could be a deal breaker.

ā€œDid you see on my profile that I’m HIV positive?ā€ he writes.

The reply arrives instantly.

ā€œYou’re disgusting. I don’t know why you’re on here.ā€ Seconds later, the profile disappears, suggesting Nester is blocked.

ā€œHe went out of his way to say that. People could at least be more aware, ask questions, and understand the reality [of living with HIV] instead of attacking us,ā€ Nester told Uncloseted Media.

ā€œI would say 95 percent of people respond that way,ā€ says Nester, who lives in Hollywood, Fla., and works at a Mexican restaurant. ā€œThe entire conversation is going fine. They’re down to meet up and then right when I mention [HIV], it’s always, ā€˜Oh no, never mind.ā€™ā€

Some other messages he’s received include:

ā€œYou’ll never get anything in your life.ā€
ā€œWhy don’t you die?ā€
ā€œWhy are you on here?ā€

More often, it’s silence, a cold ā€œNoā€ or a sudden block.

ā€œIt’s like you’re a white fish in a school of black fish,ā€ he says. ā€œYou’re immediately the odd one out.ā€

Even though Nester’s undetectable status makes it impossible for him to transmit HIV to partners during sex, he experiences stigma around HIV, something which nearly 90 percent of Americans agree still exists, according to a 2022 GLAAD report. And a survey shared in 2019 found that 64 percent of respondents would feel uncomfortable having sex with someone living with HIV, even on effective treatment. The emotional cost of this stigma is a significant barrier to intimacy and can result in a loss of self-esteem, fear of disclosure and suicidal thoughts.

What the science says ā€” and why it doesn’t seem to matter

ā€œThe fear comes from antiquated ideas around HIV,ā€ says Xavier A. Erguera, senior clinical research coordinator at University of California, San Francisco,’s Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases & Global Medicine. ā€œA lot of people who are newly diagnosed still fear it’s a death sentence. Even though we have medications now to treat it effectively, and it’s basically a chronic condition, people haven’t caught up.ā€

Since 1996, antiretroviral therapies have developed to where they can suppress the virus to levels so low that it is undetectable in the blood, and thus not able to be transmitted to sexual partners. This is known as Undetectable = Untransmittable, or U=U. According to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report from 2024, 65 percent of HIV-positive cases are virally suppressed.

Another line of defense is pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), which reduces the risk of acquiring HIV from sexual intercourse by roughly 99 percent when taken as prescribed. Approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2012, the medication launched as a once-a-day pill and was hailed as a breakthrough as it transformed the sex lives of gay men, which had been shaped by decades of fear about HIV complications and about where AIDS came from.

ā€œInternal logic doesn’t reflect what we know scientifically,ā€ says Kim Koester, associate professor in the Department of Medicine at UCSF. ā€œI was very optimistic when PrEP came out. The drug works, so why wouldn’t everyone use it?ā€

Even with PrEP use on the rise, less than 600,000 Americans used it in 2024, and Koester says skepticism and judgments about taking the drug persist.

ā€œThe phobia is pervasive,ā€ Koester told Uncloseted Media. ā€œPeople believe that others get the disease because of their lifestyle. … PrEP was supposed to be the antidote to the threat of HIV, reduce the anxiety, and make you more open to who you are and the sex you want. It’s supposed to be liberating. It is part of the answer. But it’s not enough. We don’t have enough people using PrEP for it to make the dent in the stigma we need.ā€

According to a 2023 study of seven informants living with HIV, public stigma stems from problematic views from society that those living with HIV are ā€œa dangerous transmission source,ā€ ā€œdisgracefulā€ and ā€œviolators of social and religious norms who have committed deviant behavior.ā€

Laramie Smith, assistant professor of Global Public Health at the University of California, San Diego, says this stigma is unwarranted and fueled by misunderstanding:

ā€œWith today’s treatments, it shouldn’t be a life-altering identity shift. It should be no different than, ā€˜I have diabetes.’ If you’re virally suppressed, it shouldn’t matter whether you’re friends with someone, whether you’re sleeping with someone — the science shows us that.ā€

How HIV phobia shows up online

Nester, who contracted HIV last year from a Grindr hook-up who insisted he was negative, says he is just starting to accept his diagnosis. ā€œI didn’t go back on the apps for a long time after that. It messed with my mental health … realizing I’d have to take medication for the rest of my life.ā€

Since he started dating again this year, returning to apps like Grindr and Sniffies, he has faced a new normal. He tries to do everything ā€œrightā€ and disclose his status early. Even on his Grindr profile, he identifies as ā€œpoz,ā€ slang for HIV-positive.

Still, he says most people ghost him once they find out. ā€œThe second I bring it up, it’s ā€˜No,ā€™ā€ says Nester. ā€œThe amount of discrimination you get … it’s always the same pattern. … People don’t know, and they don’t want to know. It messes with you.ā€

This discrimination may be fueled by a deprioritization of HIV awareness programs across the country. Earlier this month, the U.S. State Department did not commemorate World AIDS Day for the first time in 37 years. HIV prevention programs have been slashed, especially in conservative districts, and only 25 states and D.C. require both HIV and sex education. In many states, health curricula often lag behind current science and omit teaching about PrEP, gay sex and concepts like U=U. Research shows that Gen Z is currently the least educated generation about HIV.

ā€œI could go all day explaining HIV, but people don’t want to listen,ā€ says Nester, who is part of Gen Z. ā€œPeople don’t want to learn about it; they just want to avoid it.ā€

HIV anxiety and public stigma shaped by history

Even in more progressive areas, stigma still exists. Damian Jack, a 45-year-old from Brooklyn, remembers sitting in an exam room in 2009 as a doctor explained how low his T-cell count was, which is a hallmark of HIV infection.

ā€œI started hysterically crying,ā€ he told Uncloseted Media. ā€œHIV meant death. That’s what I thought.ā€

In 1981, when Jack was 1 year old, the first reports of a mysterious and deadly immune deficiency syndrome, which would later be named AIDS, appeared in the U.S. Growing up, Jack saw countless terrifying images of men on their deathbeds withĀ Kaposi sarcoma, the purple lesions the media once called ā€œgay cancer.ā€ Public misinformation and fearmongering spread ideas that AIDS wasĀ a disease that ā€œonly gay men and drug users get.ā€Ā And politicians often equated it with homosexuality and moral failure,Ā callingĀ it a ā€œgay plague.ā€ It wasn’t until September 1985, four years after the crisis began and thousands had died, that PresidentĀ Ronald ReaganĀ first publicly mentioned AIDS.

Decades later, the emotional residue of that era and the shame associated with the virus lingers.

Hours after learning of his diagnosis, Jack faced his first encounter with rejection. He already had a date planned that night, and his doctor and friends encouraged him to go.

They had a great time until the date asked him: ā€œAre you negative or positive?ā€

He told the truth.

ā€œIt was just understood there wouldn’t be a second date,ā€ says Jack. ā€œI remember thinking, ā€˜This is how dating is going to be now.’ I felt so anxious telling guys. It followed me everywhere. I don’t think that anxiety ever truly goes away.ā€

The emotional impact of HIV stigma

For those who are HIV-negative, experts say that ā€œstigma’s whole design is to ā€˜other.ā€™ā€

ā€œThe ā€˜us versus them’ creates that false sense of safety when it comes to HIV,ā€ says Smith. ā€œIf I can believe that someone did something to deserve their diagnosis, and I’m not that [kind of person], then I’m safe.ā€

This othering is painful and can lead to shame, fear and isolation, and it is linked to a higher risk of depression and anxiety.

ā€œIf I’m undesirable, and that’s what those messages are communicating, that threatens your sense of safety, your sense of belonging and the fundamental desire we all have to be loved,ā€ Smith says. ā€œAnd that starts to reinforce the thinking that ā€˜I am not worthy. This virus that I have means that I’m not lovable. I am not safe showing up among other men.ā€™ā€

ā€œI pretend it doesn’t hurt, but some things do sting a little bit,ā€ Nester says. ā€œYou start thinking, ā€˜Am I really that disgusting? Am I really that singled out?ā€™ā€

When public stigma turns inward

ā€œInternalized stigma is what occurs when applying the stereotypes about who gets HIV, the prejudice, the negative feelings, onto yourself,ā€ says Smith.

In 2024, 38 percent of people living with HIVĀ reported internalized stigma. AndĀ studiesĀ show that it can predict hopelessness and lower quality of life, even when people are engaged in care or virally suppressed.

Internalized stigma can also affect how people practice safe sex and communicate about the virus. A 2019 survey of men who have sex with men found that individuals who perceived greater community-level stigma were less likely to be aware of ā€” and use — safer-sex functions available on dating apps, such as HIV-status disclosure fields, as well as sexual health information and resources.

ā€œ[HIV phobia] is probably the most intense, subvert bigotry I think you could experience,ā€ Joseph Monroe Jr., a 48-year-old living in the Bronx, told Uncloseted Media.

On dating apps, men have messaged him things like, ā€œYou look like you’ve got that thingā€ and ā€œGo ahead and infect someone else.ā€

Monroe has also dealt with misinformed people who rudely opine about how he contracted the virus: ā€œWho fucked you? That’s how you got it, right?ā€ people will say to him.

ā€œYou end up internalizing all these stereotypes about who gets HIV — that you were promiscuous, that you didn’t care about yourself, that you did something wrong,ā€ says Smith. ā€œYou carry that in, and then you have to relearn: ā€˜No, I didn’t. This is just a health condition.ā€™ā€

What HIV acceptance looks like and raising awareness

For those living with HIV, acceptance feels far away.

ā€œYou’re living under this threat of HIV and the threat that others find you threatening. It inhabits you socially and sexually,ā€ Koester says. ā€œPeople are hunkering down. Not putting themselves out there and having a mediocre quality of life. To have a sense of empowerment, you have to be legitimate and seen in the world and it’s hard to do that with the stigma that exists.ā€

Researchers say the path forward lies as much in conversation as in medicine.

Koester says she talks about HIV and PrEP anywhere she can, including in salons, cafes and restaurants. ā€œWhenever I get into a cab with someone, I’m going to bring up HIV so the driver gets accustomed to hearing about it. … We have a long way to go in terms of exposure and awareness and every little bit helps.ā€

Part of this lies in increasing awareness through targeted marketing campaigns. PrEP is still profoundlyĀ misunderstood outside major urban centers, withĀ uneven uptakeĀ among minority groups and usageĀ gaps in the Bible Belt. And a 2022 U.S.Ā surveyĀ found that 54.5 percent of people living with HIV didn’t know what U=U meant, and less thanĀ halfĀ of Americans agree that people living with HIV who are on proper medications cannot transmit the virus.

While eradicating stigma is slow, there is hope for acceptance.

Years after Jack’s diagnosis, in 2021, he told a man he was on a third date with that he was HIV-positive but undetectable. His date’s reply was almost casual:

ā€œOh — is that it? I thought you were going to say you had a boyfriend or something. I’m on PrEP. You’re fine.ā€

ā€œIt felt so good to hear him say that and accept me,ā€ says Jack. ā€œI was like, ā€˜This is my person. You’re my person.ā€™ā€ One year later, they got married.

Back in Florida, 19-year-old Cody Nester isn’t feeling this acceptance. He still scrolls past profiles that read ā€œOnly negative guysā€ and tries to ignore the hateful messages.

ā€œIt still hurts, but I know it’s coming from fear,ā€ he says. ā€œI wasn’t too informed about HIV before I got it. … When I got it, I really jumped into the rabbit hole and began to learn. I really do think [HIV and stigma] is because people are not knowledgeable. … When people don’t know details, they tend to get scared.ā€

Additional reporting by Nandika Chatterjee.

Continue Reading

Health

Developing countries to receive breakthrough HIV prevention drug at low cost

Announcement coincided with UN General Assembly

Published

on

(Bigstock photo)

Philanthropic organizations on Wednesday announced two agreements with Indian pharmaceutical companies that will allow a breakthrough HIV prevention drug to become available in developing countries for $40 a year per patient.

The New York Times notes Unitaid, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, and Wits RHI reached an agreement with Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories to distribute lenacapavir. The Gates Foundation and Hetero brokered a separate deal.

Unitaid, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, Wits RHI, and the Gates Foundation announced their respective agreements against the backdrop of the U.N. General Assembly.

Lenacapavir users inject the drug twice a year.

UNAIDS in a press release notes lenacapavir in the U.S. currently costs $28,000 a year per person.

ā€œThis is a watershed moment,” said UNAIDS Executive Director Winnie Byanyima in a statement. “A price of USD 40 per person per year is a leap forward that will help to unlock the revolutionary potential of long-acting HIV medicines.ā€

The State Department earlier this month announced PEPFAR will distribute lenacapavir in countries with high HIV prevalence rates. A press release notes Gilead Sciences, which manufactures the drug, is “offering this product to PEPFAR and the Global Fund at cost and without profit.ā€

Continue Reading

Popular