Local
Md. may recognize out-of-state gay marriages
Attorney general issues opinion as D.C. couples prepare to wed
Maryland Attorney General Douglas Gansler issued a long-awaited opinion Wednesday saying same-sex marriages performed in other states or countries most likely would have full legal standing in the state.
But in his 53-page legal opinion, Gansler said the Maryland Court of Appeals would have the final say in the matter should opponents of same-sex marriage choose to contest the legal standing of married same-sex couples living in or visiting the state.
Ganslerās opinion comes one week before a law allowing same-sex marriages to be performed in D.C. is expected to take effect March 3. Same-sex couples in Maryland have said they would likely make wedding plans in the District in response to a favorable opinion from Gansler.
The attorney generalās opinion comes nine months after state Sen. Richard Madaleno (D-Montgomery County), who is gay, asked Gansler to issue an official opinion on the question of whether the state could legally recognize same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions.
āYou have asked whether those marriages may be recognized under state law,ā Gansler said in his opinion, which is addressed to Madaleno. āThe answer to that question is clearly āyes.āā
Madaleno could not immediately be reached for comment, but he told the Washington Post in a brief interview that changes in state policy could now result from a court ruling, legislation or administrative action, though none of those is imminent.
Gansler says in the opinion that while he believes the legal concept of state āpublic policyā favors recognition of out-of-state gay marriages, others might raise legal grounds to contest that view.
In particular, he points to the 2007 ruling by the Maryland Court of Appeals upholding the stateās marriage law banning same-sex marriages from being performed in the state. In that 4-3 ruling denounced by LGBT activists, the court ruled that restricting marriage to a man and a woman doesnāt discriminate against same-sex couples or deny them rights under the state constitution. The court held that the ban on same-sex marriage instead promotes the stateās āinterestā in traditional heterosexual marriage as a means of fostering procreation and protecting children.
But Gansler says in his opinion that the appeals court decision should not be a key factor in determining whether Maryland could recognize same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions.
āThe Court of Appeals would start from the general principle that a marriage that is valid in the place of celebration remains valid in Maryland,ā he said in his opinion. āThere are exceptions to that rule if the particular marriage is contrary to a strong state public policy. A statute that limits marriage in Maryland to opposite-sex couples could be said to embody a policy against same-sex marriage.ā
However, Gansler noted that the Court of Appeals has not prevented the state from recognizing various types of marriages performed in other states that are not allowed to be performed in Maryland under the stateās marriage law. Among them are common law marriages, which are recognized in many other states. The Court of Appeals also upheld a Rhode Island marriage between an uncle and a niece, even though the Maryland marriage law prohibits such a marriage, Gansler says in his opinion.
āWhile the matter is not free from all doubt, in our view, the court is likely to respect the law of other states and recognize a same-sex marriage contracted validly in another jurisdiction,ā he says. āIn light of Marylandās developing public policy concerning intimate same-sex relationships, the court would not readily invoke the public policy exception to the usual rule of recognition.ā
In response to a second question raised by Madaleno, Gansler says in his opinion that Maryland Gov. Martin OāMalley does not have authority to issue an executive order recognizing same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions.
In his May 19, 2009, letter to Gansler requesting the same-sex marriage recognition opinion, Madaleno pointed out that New York Gov. David Paterson issued such an order, clearing the way for New York to recognize out-of-state same-sex marriages, even though the legislature had not approved a same-sex marriage bill.
āAn executive order of the governor must be consistent with existing Maryland law, as enacted by the General Assembly and construed by the courts,ā Gansler says.
LGBT rights groups hailed Ganslerās opinion as an important breakthrough for the marriage equality movement.
āToday is a day to celebrate,ā said Morgan Meneses-Sheets, executive director of Equality Maryland, a state LGBT advocacy group.
āEquality Maryland applauds a favorable opinion released by the Office of Attorney General Doug Gansler that states that the marriages of same-gender couples legalized in other jurisdictions have standing to be honored here at home.ā
But Rick Bowers, director of Christian Impact Alliance, a Maryland group opposed to same-sex marriage, said Gansler acted without legal authority to issue such a ruling.
āThe governing body over a decision like this should be the General Assembly or the people of the state of Maryland through a vote by referendum,ā Bowers said.
Gay rights groups, however, disputed Bowers assessment, saying Gansler has authority to issue such an opinion.
Lambda Legal, a national LGBT group, praised Ganslerās opinion for āsaying that recognition of out-of-state marriages of same-sex couples is consistent with Maryland law.ā
Susan Sommer, director of the groupās Constitutional Litigation program, said the Gansler opinion āshould bring some peace of mind to married same-sex couples and their families in Maryland as this state aligns itself with New York, making clear that there is no gay exception to long-standing marriage recognition law.ā
Evan Wolfson, executive director of the national same-sex marriage advocacy group Freedom to Marry, said he was confident that the Maryland Court of Appeals would uphold Ganslerās assessment that valid same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions have full legal standing in Maryland.
āMarylandās typical practice, like all states historically, is to honor marriages rather than destabilize them,ā Wolfson said. āThe Maryland Attorney General is concluding, looking at Maryland law, that there is no reason for a gay exception to that tradition and common sense practice.ā
While praising Ganslerās opinion as an important development for same-sex marriage equality, some LGBT organizations said it focuses attention on the need for all states to adopt same-sex marriage laws.
āTodayās opinion by the Maryland Attorney General only continues to further highlight the burdensome patchwork of unequal laws same-sex couples face across the country,ā said Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign. āWith every step that is taken in the progress toward full equality, it becomes more and more obvious that separate is not equal and marriage by any other name is not marriage.ā
The action by Gansler on Wednesday also comes less than a month after the Maryland House Judiciary Committee voted 12-8 to defeat a bill that would have banned same-sex marriage in the state. The measure was introduced by Del. Emmett Burns (D-Baltimore County), who said he anticipated Ganslerās opinion would back same-sex marriage recognition.
Maryland Del. Don Dwyer (R-Anne Arundel County), meanwhile, is ādefinitelyā moving ahead with plans to file impeachment papers against Gansler for his same-sex marriage recognition opinion, according to spokesperson Louisa Baucom.
āHis position about the opinion is that Attorney General Gansler had no right to issue the opinion, regardless of what the opinion is ā that his constitutional limitations prohibit that,ā Baucom said.
āHe will be drawing up letters of impeachment against Attorney General Gansler,ā she said, adding that the charges would be based on āviolation of his oath of office.ā
District of Columbia
Two charged with assaulting, robbing gay man at D.C. CVS store
Incident occurred after suspects, victim āexchanged wordsā at bar

D.C. police just after 1 a.m. on April 10 arrested two men for allegedly assaulting and robbing a gay man inside a CVS store at 1418 P St., N.W., according to a police report and charging documents filed in D.C. Superior Court.
The charging documents state that the alleged assault and robbery occurred a short time after the three men āexchanged wordsā at the gay bar Number 9, which is located across the street from the CVS.
The arrested men are identified in the charging documents as Marquel Jose Diaz, 27, of Northwest D.C., and Lorenzo Jesse Scafidi, 21, of Elizabeth City, N.C. An affidavit in support of the arrest for Diaz says Diaz and the victim āwere previously in a relationship for a year.ā
Court records show Diaz was charged with Simple Assault, Theft Second Degree, and Possession of a Controlled Substance. The court records show the controlled substance charge was filed by police after Diaz was found to be in possession of a powdered substance that tested positive for cocaine.
Scafidi was charged with Simple Assault and Theft Second Degree, the court records show.
The D.C. police report for the incident does not list it as a suspected hate crime.
The court records show both men pleaded not guilty to the charges against them at a Superior Court arraignment on the day of their arrest on April 10. The records show they were released by a judge while awaiting trial with an order that they āstay awayā from the victim. They are scheduled to return to court for a status hearing on May 21.
The separate police-filed affidavits in support of the arrests of both Diaz and Scafidi each state that the two men and the victim āexchanged wordsā inside the Number 9 bar. The two documents state that both men then entered the CVS store after the victim went to the store a short time earlier.
Scafidi ācame into the CVS shortly after and entered the candy aisle and slammed Complainant 1 [the victim] to the ground causing Complainant 1ās phone to fall out of CP-1ās pocket,ā one of the two affidavits says. It says Scafidi āagain picked up CP-1 and slammed him to the ground.ā
The affidavit in support of Diazās arrest says Diaz also followed the victim to the CVS store after words were exchanged at the bar. It says that after Scafidi allegedly knocked the victim down in the candy aisle Diaz picked up the victimās phone, āswung onā the victim āwhile he was still on the ground,ā and picked up the victimās watch before he and Scafidi fled the scene.
Without saying why, the two arrest affidavits say Diaz and Scafidi returned to the scene and were arrested by police after the victim and at least one witness identified them as having assaulted and robbed the victim.
Attorneys representing the two arrested men did not respond to phone messages from the Washington Blade seeking comment and asking whether their clients dispute the allegations against them.
The victim also did not respond to attempts by the Blade to obtain a comment from him. The police report says the victim is a resident of Fairfax, Va.
District of Columbia
Bowser calls for āextraordinaryā response to reduction in D.C. budget
Impact on city funding for LGBTQ programs and grants unclear

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser on April 15 issued an executive order calling for āextraordinary actions,ā including āsignificant cuts in District Government services,ā to address a decision by Congress to cut the cityās current budget by $1.1 billion.
The nine-page executive order points out that these actions became necessary after the U.S. House of Representatives has so far declined to vote on a free-standing bill approved by the U.S. Senate last month that would restore the $1.1 billion D.C. budget cut initially approved by the House.
In addition to large-scale cuts in city services, the mayoral order says the congressionally imposed city budget cut will bring about city āhiring freezes, financial impacts to employees, reductions and terminations in contracts and grants, and closures of District Government facilities.ā
The order adds, āThese are unprecedented actions given that the District itself adopted and is able to implement a fully balanced budget, but they are necessary due to the Congressional cut to the Districtās budget and its inaction in timely fixing its legislative error.ā
The House adjourned this week on a recess until the end of April, and congressional observers say it is unclear whether the majority Republican House will take up the Senate bill to undo the D.C. budget cut when the House returns from its recess. President Donald Trump has called on the House to approve the bill to restore the full D.C. budget.
Among the D.C. LGBTQ organizations and those providing services to the LGBTQ community that receive D.C. government funding and that could be impacted by the budget cuts are Capital Pride Alliance, which is organizing WorldPride 2025 set to take place in D.C. next month; and Whitman-Walker Health, one of the cityās largest private healthcare organizations that provides medical services for LGBTQ clients.
Also receiving city funding are the Wanda Alston Foundation, which provides housing services for LGBTQ people; and the LGBTQ youth advocacy and services organization SMYAL.
Spokespersons for the four organizations couldnāt immediately be reached to determine if they knew whether the soon-to-be implemented budget cuts would have an impact on the city funding they currently receive.
In response to questions from news reporters during an April 15 press conference call to discuss the Bowser executive order, Jenny Reed, director of the D.C. Office of Budget and Performance Management, said details on specific programs or funding allocations set to be cut would not be known until the mayor submits to the D.C. Council her Supplemental FY 2025 budget along with her proposed FY 2026 budget.
Reed was joined at the press briefing by Lindsey Parker, Mayor Bowserās chief of staff; and Tomas Talamante, director of the Office of Intergovernmental Affairs.
They and other city officials have said the impact of the congressionally imposed city budget cut was expected to be lessened but remain highly problematic by Bowserās decision to invoke a 2009 law that allows the city to increase its own spending without approval by Congress under certain circumstances.
The mayor has said under that law, the city would need to cut its FY 2025 budget by $410 million rather than by $1.1 billion. It couldnāt immediately be determined whether House Republicans, who initiated the requirement that the D.C. budget be cut by $1.1 billion, would challenge the mayorās plan to invoke the 2009 law to reduce the size of the budget cut.
āWithout the ability to fully execute the Fiscal Year 2025 budget as adopted and approved by the District, this gap will force reductions in critical services provided by our largest agencies, including the Metropolitan Police Department and the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department,ā the mayorās executive order states.
āThe District will continue to work with members of the House of Representatives to urge them to vote to fully restore the Districtās Fiscal year 2025 budget and will continue to work with President Trump to strongly encourage the House of Representatives to take that action,ā the order says.
District of Columbia
LGBTQ budget advocates fight for D.C. resources in a tough fiscal year
‘Trying to preserve life-saving services’ amid $1 billion cut

The months and days leading up to June are especially busy for LGBTQ Washingtonians. For one group, the DC LGBT Budget Coalition, which works year-round to ensure LGBTQ residents are represented and financially supported by the D.C. government, this time of year is their Super Bowl. Beginning in April, the D.C. Council and Mayorās Office hold budget hearings for the next fiscal year.
With D.C.’s budget now under review, the Washington Blade spoke with Heidi Ellis, coordinator of the DC LGBT Budget Coalition, about the groupās top priorities and their push to ensure continued support for queer communities.
āThe LGBTQ Budget Coalition was founded in 2020 at the height of the pandemic, as a way for the community to work together to advocate for key funding and policy changes,ā Ellis said. āWe recognized we were stronger together. A lot of groups are often pitted against each other for resources and dollars. This coalition was founded out of a need for unity. Since then, weāve successfully advocated for more than $20 million in dedicated LGBTQ investments.ā
In addition to coordinating the coalition, Ellis is the founder and CEO of HME Consulting & Advocacy, a firm that helps build coalitions and advance policy initiatives that address intersectional issues in the LGBTQ community. One of its most powerful tools, she explained, is direct outreach through community surveys.
āWe actually do community surveys to see what people need and whatās top of mind,ā Ellis said. āOf course, we also pay attention to the broader political landscape ā like the current threats to HIV funding. That helps us prioritize.ā
Because the coalition is comprised of more than 20 organizations across various sectors āhealthcare, housing, community organizing ā Ellis said its diversity enables it to connect grassroots needs to potential policy solutions.
āOur coalition includes service providers, community groups, health and housing advocates-folks who are deeply plugged into whatās happening on the ground,ā she said. āThey help determine our direction. We know we donāt represent every queer person in D.C., but our coalition reflects a wide range of identities and experiences.ā
The insights gathered through those surveys ultimately inform the coalitionās annual budget proposal, which is submitted to the Council and mayor.
āThatās how we got to our FY26 priorities,ā she said. āThis year, more than ever, weāre fighting to protect what weāve already secured ā funding and policies weāve had to fight for in the past. We know thereās concern around this budget.ā
One of the challenges this year is that the D.C. governmentās operating budget and some of its legislation must be approved by Congress. With a projected decline in tax revenue and a Republican-controlled Congress that has historically opposed LGBTQ funding, the Coalition has had to think strategically.
āEven before the situation on the Hill, the CFO projected lower revenue,ā Ellis said. āThat meant cuts to social programs were already coming. And now, with the $1 billion slashed from D.C.ās budget due to the continuing resolution, weāre not only fighting for D.C.ās budget and autonomy, but also trying to preserve life-saving services. Our message is simple: Donāt forget about queer people.ā
This yearās proposal doesnāt include specific dollar figures. Instead, the Coalition outlines five funding priority areas: Healthcare, Employment & Economic Equity, Housing, Safety & Community Support, and Civil Rights.
Why no exact amounts? Ellis said itās because not all solutions are financial.
āSome of our asks donāt require new funding. Others build on existing programs-weāre asking whether the current use of funds is the most effective. Weāre also proposing policy changes that wouldnāt cost extra but could make a real difference. Itās about using what we have better,ā she said.
When drafting the proposal, the Coalition tries to prioritize those with the most pressing and intersecting needs.
āOur perspective is: If we advocate for the most vulnerable, others benefit too,ā Ellis said. āTake LGBTQ seniors. Some may have done well in life but now face housing insecurity or struggle to access affordable healthcare. Many in our coalition are elders who fought on the frontlines during the AIDS epidemic. They bring critical historical context and remind us that Black and brown communities bore the brunt of that crisis.ā
āI love our coalition because it keeps us accountable to the moment,ā she added. āIf we center those most marginalized, we can make an impact that lifts everyone.ā
In addition to healthcare and housing, safety remains a top concern. The Coalition has fought to maintain funding for the Violence Prevention and Response Team (VPART), a city-supported group that includes MPD, community-based organizations, and the Mayorās Office of LGBTQ Affairs. VPART responds to crimes affecting the LGBTQ community and connects victims to legal, healthcare, and housing services.
āWeāve pushed to make VPART more proactive, not just reactive,ā Ellis said. āThe funding weāve secured has helped survivors get the support they need. Cutting that funding now would undo progress weāre just beginning to see.ā
At the end of the day, Ellis emphasized that this process is about far more than spreadsheets.
āA budget is a moral document,ā she said. āIf weāre not represented, youāre telling us our lives donāt matter at a time when we need protection the most. When people canāt get food, medicine, housing ā that has a devastating impact. These are vital services.ā
The DC LGBT Budget Coalition is urging residents to support a letter-writing campaign to D.C. Council members and the mayor. You can send a letter here: https://actionnetwork.org/letters/fully-fund-dcs-lgbtq-communities
Read the full FY26 budget proposal here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bTrENnc4ZazJTO6LPrQ3lZkF02QNIIf1/view
-
The White House5 days ago
White House does not ‘respond’ to reporters’ requests with pronouns included
-
District of Columbia2 days ago
Reenactment of 1965 gay rights protest at White House set for April 17
-
Hungary2 days ago
Hungarian MPs amend constitution to ban public LGBTQ events
-
Maryland2 days ago
FreeState Justice: Transgender activist āhijackedā Mooreās Transgender Day of Visibility event