Connect with us

Health

Obama AIDS panel bucks White House on drug funds

Resolution calls for $126 million ADAP emergency measure

Published

on

Members of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS this week called on President Obama and Congress to approve $126 million in emergency funds for the struggling AIDS Drug Assistance Program. (Photo by Pete Souza, courtesy White House)

President Obama’s newly appointed Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS adopted a resolution Tuesday urging the White House and Congress to do something they have been reluctant to do: approve $126 million in emergency funds for the struggling AIDS Drug Assistance Program.

The federal program, which is operated jointly with states, provides subsidies for life-saving anti-retroviral drugs needed by low-income people with HIV and AIDS who lack health insurance coverage.

Due to several developments, including sharp budget cuts by states, a record 1,924 people eligible to enroll in the program in 11 states have been placed on waiting lists as state ADAPs have run out of money to pay for the drugs, state officials have said. The waiting lists are expected to grow in the coming weeks and months.

AIDS activists have criticized the White House and Democratic leaders in Congress for not taking immediate steps to push the emergency funding this year, saying people on the waiting lists face possible life-threatening illnesses related to HIV without their medication.

More than 50 members of the House, including gay Reps. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) and Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) sent a petition to the White House earlier this year calling for $126 million in supplemental funds for ADAP in the current fiscal year.

The presidential AIDS panel, known as PACHA, adopted its resolution at a special conference call meeting Tuesday.

The conference call came after some PACHA members complained that the panel was distracted from adopting the resolution and addressing other important business at its previous in-person meeting at the White House in April by administration staffers who overly “stage managed” the meeting, according to insiders familiar with the panel.

The 24-member PACHA includes seven out gay members. It’s chaired by Dr. Helen Gale, a nationally recognized AIDS physician and former top official at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention.

“I don’t think the PACHA is being stage managed, but I do think that it is being over handled,” said PACHA member Phill Wilson, executive director of the Black AIDS Institute in Los Angeles.

Wilson said it would be an exaggeration to characterize as a “rebellion” the call by PACHA members for a special meeting this week to vote on the ADAP resolution, as one source familiar with PACHA called it.

But he said PACHA members assigned to a subcommittee that monitors ADAP issues made it clear that it would be unacceptable for the advisory body to wait until its next regularly scheduled meeting in September to take up the ADAP issue.

Wilson and fellow PACHA member A. Cornelius Baker, former executive director of the National Association of People with AIDS and the Whitman-Walker Clinic, said the newly reconstituted PACHA appeared to be having some organizational and logistical problems.

Among other things, Baker and PACHA member Rosie Perez, actress and AIDS activist, expressed concern at the April meeting that White House officials arranged for the meeting to be held in an auditorium at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building next to the White House that was not conducive for members to conduct business.

Most of the first day of the two-day meeting in April was devoted to listening to comments by members of the public, including AIDS activists. Although a precedent for listening to public comments began under the Clinton administration, one AIDS activist attending the April meeting said it evolved into a “chaotic” town hall type meeting that prevented members — who were appointed for their expertise in various aspects of public health, medicine and public policy — from tackling issues such as ADAP.

Sessions on the second day were not open to the public, raising questions that administration staffers violated a federal law that requires all federal government advisory bodies to conduct business in public.

Christopher Bates, PACHA’s staff executive director, told activists who complained about the closed meeting that the session was limited to discussing “administrative” matters and no official business was conducted.

Wilson and Baker said this week that the White House and the Department of Health & Human Services, which has direct supervision over PACHA, were working to correct the problems, with the possibility that new meeting space would be found.

But new organizational and technical issues surfaced during Tuesday’s conference call when an audio muting mechanism prevented members of the public who were approved in advance to speak from being heard by Gale, who presided over the call.

When a roll call vote was taken on the ADAP resolution, some of the PACHA members also could not be heard, alerting the staff that a technical glitch kept the PACHA members’ phone on mute.

As required by a federal advisory body statute, the conference call meeting was announced two weeks earlier in the Federal Register, which instructed people interested in speaking during a public comment period how to dial in to the call.

A technician facilitating the conference call eventually lifted the muting mechanism to allow everyone to speak. But shortly after that happened, someone apparently called the meeting to an end while the phone lines remained open. At least two callers expressed outrage that they were not allowed to speak, and several callers began their own discussion before someone terminated the conference call.

Before the confusion began, Gale announced the roll call vote had been completed and the resolution calling for the $126 million emergency ADAP funds had been approved.

Prior to the discussion and vote on the resolution, HHS official Deborah Parham told call participants the administration would allocate $17.5 million in Ryan White funds in August that states could use for their ADAP programs. She said additional Ryan White funds were available to help struggling states in their overall programs to assist people with HIV/AIDS.

HHS recognizes “the need to improve access to critical HIV/AIDS prescription drugs and we’re working to prevent and ultimately eliminate the need for ADAP waiting lists,” Parham told call participants. But she did not say whether the administration would agree to the $126 million emergency funding allocation for ADAP called for by the PACHA resolution.

President Bill Clinton created PACHA in the 1990s. President George W. Bush retained the panel and continued Clinton’s practice of naming several gays to serve on PACHA, including several gay Republican activists.

The Obama administration did not call any PACHA meetings in its first year in office, prompting some activists to ask if the new administration planned to retain the panel. But in February, the White House disclosed it had dismissed all PACHA members appointed by Bush and introduced what it called a “reconstituted” PACHA with 24 new members.

According to Jeff Crowley, director of the White House Office of National AIDS Policy, the new members were appointed by Health & Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius with White House consultation.

At the first meeting Feb. 2, Sebelius administered the oath of office for members and said she and the White House would utilize PACHA as a “platform for the administration to share our plans and insights” on AIDS programs and proposals.

“Today, I’m pleased to have a new group of experts joining PACHA,” Obama said in a statement released at the February meeting. “And I look forward to hearing from the council about our continued efforts to prevent the spread of HIV infections in the United States and to provide care and treatment to people living with HIV/AIDS around the world.”

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Health

Choose U ambassadors share lived experiences with HIV, personal reflections, and insights

Published

on

The Choose U World AIDS Day panel brought together three longtime advocates living with HIV to talk about care, stigma, and what living with HIV over the long-term means to them. The conversation featured Jahlove Serrano, Joyce Belton, and Andrew Nichols, who have each lived with HIV for more than 20 years. News is Out hosted the event in partnership with Gilead Sciences.

“Co-created with community representatives from around the world, Choose U is comprised of inspiring examples of how the outlook for aging with HIV has dramatically changed,” Gilead shared in the recent launch of the program. “By focusing on the real-world experiences of people in different circumstances, Choose U spotlights individuals prioritizing starting and staying on HIV treatment, self-care, and overall strategies to help them lead healthier lives.”

The Choose U ambassadors opened with a clear message: Lived experience drives understanding.

Each panelist talked through the decisions, relationships, and periods of uncertainty that shaped their HIV care. They also described their approaches to HIV treatment and adherence, including the importance of staying on treatment to help lower the risk of HIV drug resistance. They reflected on the shifts they have seen in HIV treatment over the decades, the value of honest conversations with providers, and how staying engaged in care and on HIV treatment helped them lead longer, healthier lives.

The panel discussed U=U, which stands for “Undetectable equals Untransmittable.” Undetectable means there is so little virus in the blood that a lab test can’t measure it. Research shows that taking HIV treatment as prescribed, and getting to and staying undetectable, prevents HIV from spreading through sex.

The panelists also spoke about the emotional side of living with HIV over the long-term and the stigma they have faced. Joyce described a personal moment when her pastor visited her in the hospital and how that experience began her work educating her church community about HIV.

Jahlove talked about how his biological family reacted to his diagnosis. “When I disclosed my status, they told me that I put a shame on the family,” said Jahlove. When he shared his status with his peers, they responded with support, which gave him a sense of empowerment.

Andrew, a professional therapist, described how he has experienced stigma in dating and in his workplace, and why he turns to therapy for guidance. “Therapy has really helped me rebuild my confidence and realize my self-worth has to come from me,” said Andrew. “Then after that, I can help with the greater community.”

The panel closed with a message for others living with HIV: They encouraged viewers to start and stay engaged in HIV treatment and care, ask questions, and rely on supportive networks. Their stories show how starting and staying on treatment over the long-term, community, and affirmation can shape well-being.

A recording of the full 30-minute event is now available on YouTube, which you can access here.

Continue Reading

Health

The harsh truth about HIV phobia in gay dating

HIV and stigma remain baked into queer dating culture

Published

on

(Photo by Val Chaparro for Uncloseted Media)

Uncloseted Media published this article on Dec. 9.

This story was produced with the support of MISTR, a telehealth platform offering free online access to PrEP, DoxyPEP, STI testing, Hepatitis C testing and treatment and long-term HIV care across the U.S. MISTR did not have any editorial input into the content of this story.

By SAM DONNDELINGER | In his room, 19-year-old Cody Nester toggles between Grindr profiles on his phone.

As he senses chemistry with a match, he knows he has to flag something that could be a deal breaker.

“Did you see on my profile that I’m HIV positive?” he writes.

The reply arrives instantly.

“You’re disgusting. I don’t know why you’re on here.” Seconds later, the profile disappears, suggesting Nester is blocked.

“He went out of his way to say that. People could at least be more aware, ask questions, and understand the reality [of living with HIV] instead of attacking us,” Nester told Uncloseted Media.

“I would say 95 percent of people respond that way,” says Nester, who lives in Hollywood, Fla., and works at a Mexican restaurant. “The entire conversation is going fine. They’re down to meet up and then right when I mention [HIV], it’s always, ‘Oh no, never mind.’”

Some other messages he’s received include:

“You’ll never get anything in your life.”
“Why don’t you die?”
“Why are you on here?”

More often, it’s silence, a cold “No” or a sudden block.

“It’s like you’re a white fish in a school of black fish,” he says. “You’re immediately the odd one out.”

Even though Nester’s undetectable status makes it impossible for him to transmit HIV to partners during sex, he experiences stigma around HIV, something which nearly 90 percent of Americans agree still exists, according to a 2022 GLAAD report. And a survey shared in 2019 found that 64 percent of respondents would feel uncomfortable having sex with someone living with HIV, even on effective treatment. The emotional cost of this stigma is a significant barrier to intimacy and can result in a loss of self-esteem, fear of disclosure and suicidal thoughts.

What the science says — and why it doesn’t seem to matter

“The fear comes from antiquated ideas around HIV,” says Xavier A. Erguera, senior clinical research coordinator at University of California, San Francisco,’s Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases & Global Medicine. “A lot of people who are newly diagnosed still fear it’s a death sentence. Even though we have medications now to treat it effectively, and it’s basically a chronic condition, people haven’t caught up.”

Since 1996, antiretroviral therapies have developed to where they can suppress the virus to levels so low that it is undetectable in the blood, and thus not able to be transmitted to sexual partners. This is known as Undetectable = Untransmittable, or U=U. According to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report from 2024, 65 percent of HIV-positive cases are virally suppressed.

Another line of defense is pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), which reduces the risk of acquiring HIV from sexual intercourse by roughly 99 percent when taken as prescribed. Approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2012, the medication launched as a once-a-day pill and was hailed as a breakthrough as it transformed the sex lives of gay men, which had been shaped by decades of fear about HIV complications and about where AIDS came from.

“Internal logic doesn’t reflect what we know scientifically,” says Kim Koester, associate professor in the Department of Medicine at UCSF. “I was very optimistic when PrEP came out. The drug works, so why wouldn’t everyone use it?”

Even with PrEP use on the rise, less than 600,000 Americans used it in 2024, and Koester says skepticism and judgments about taking the drug persist.

“The phobia is pervasive,” Koester told Uncloseted Media. “People believe that others get the disease because of their lifestyle. … PrEP was supposed to be the antidote to the threat of HIV, reduce the anxiety, and make you more open to who you are and the sex you want. It’s supposed to be liberating. It is part of the answer. But it’s not enough. We don’t have enough people using PrEP for it to make the dent in the stigma we need.”

According to a 2023 study of seven informants living with HIV, public stigma stems from problematic views from society that those living with HIV are “a dangerous transmission source,” “disgraceful” and “violators of social and religious norms who have committed deviant behavior.”

Laramie Smith, assistant professor of Global Public Health at the University of California, San Diego, says this stigma is unwarranted and fueled by misunderstanding:

“With today’s treatments, it shouldn’t be a life-altering identity shift. It should be no different than, ‘I have diabetes.’ If you’re virally suppressed, it shouldn’t matter whether you’re friends with someone, whether you’re sleeping with someone — the science shows us that.”

How HIV phobia shows up online

Nester, who contracted HIV last year from a Grindr hook-up who insisted he was negative, says he is just starting to accept his diagnosis. “I didn’t go back on the apps for a long time after that. It messed with my mental health … realizing I’d have to take medication for the rest of my life.”

Since he started dating again this year, returning to apps like Grindr and Sniffies, he has faced a new normal. He tries to do everything “right” and disclose his status early. Even on his Grindr profile, he identifies as “poz,” slang for HIV-positive.

Still, he says most people ghost him once they find out. “The second I bring it up, it’s ‘No,’” says Nester. “The amount of discrimination you get … it’s always the same pattern. … People don’t know, and they don’t want to know. It messes with you.”

This discrimination may be fueled by a deprioritization of HIV awareness programs across the country. Earlier this month, the U.S. State Department did not commemorate World AIDS Day for the first time in 37 years. HIV prevention programs have been slashed, especially in conservative districts, and only 25 states and D.C. require both HIV and sex education. In many states, health curricula often lag behind current science and omit teaching about PrEP, gay sex and concepts like U=U. Research shows that Gen Z is currently the least educated generation about HIV.

“I could go all day explaining HIV, but people don’t want to listen,” says Nester, who is part of Gen Z. “People don’t want to learn about it; they just want to avoid it.”

HIV anxiety and public stigma shaped by history

Even in more progressive areas, stigma still exists. Damian Jack, a 45-year-old from Brooklyn, remembers sitting in an exam room in 2009 as a doctor explained how low his T-cell count was, which is a hallmark of HIV infection.

“I started hysterically crying,” he told Uncloseted Media. “HIV meant death. That’s what I thought.”

In 1981, when Jack was 1 year old, the first reports of a mysterious and deadly immune deficiency syndrome, which would later be named AIDS, appeared in the U.S. Growing up, Jack saw countless terrifying images of men on their deathbeds with Kaposi sarcoma, the purple lesions the media once called “gay cancer.” Public misinformation and fearmongering spread ideas that AIDS was a disease that “only gay men and drug users get.” And politicians often equated it with homosexuality and moral failure, calling it a “gay plague.” It wasn’t until September 1985, four years after the crisis began and thousands had died, that President Ronald Reagan first publicly mentioned AIDS.

Decades later, the emotional residue of that era and the shame associated with the virus lingers.

Hours after learning of his diagnosis, Jack faced his first encounter with rejection. He already had a date planned that night, and his doctor and friends encouraged him to go.

They had a great time until the date asked him: “Are you negative or positive?”

He told the truth.

“It was just understood there wouldn’t be a second date,” says Jack. “I remember thinking, ‘This is how dating is going to be now.’ I felt so anxious telling guys. It followed me everywhere. I don’t think that anxiety ever truly goes away.”

The emotional impact of HIV stigma

For those who are HIV-negative, experts say that “stigma’s whole design is to ‘other.’”

“The ‘us versus them’ creates that false sense of safety when it comes to HIV,” says Smith. “If I can believe that someone did something to deserve their diagnosis, and I’m not that [kind of person], then I’m safe.”

This othering is painful and can lead to shame, fear and isolation, and it is linked to a higher risk of depression and anxiety.

“If I’m undesirable, and that’s what those messages are communicating, that threatens your sense of safety, your sense of belonging and the fundamental desire we all have to be loved,” Smith says. “And that starts to reinforce the thinking that ‘I am not worthy. This virus that I have means that I’m not lovable. I am not safe showing up among other men.’”

“I pretend it doesn’t hurt, but some things do sting a little bit,” Nester says. “You start thinking, ‘Am I really that disgusting? Am I really that singled out?’”

When public stigma turns inward

“Internalized stigma is what occurs when applying the stereotypes about who gets HIV, the prejudice, the negative feelings, onto yourself,” says Smith.

In 2024, 38 percent of people living with HIV reported internalized stigma. And studies show that it can predict hopelessness and lower quality of life, even when people are engaged in care or virally suppressed.

Internalized stigma can also affect how people practice safe sex and communicate about the virus. A 2019 survey of men who have sex with men found that individuals who perceived greater community-level stigma were less likely to be aware of — and use — safer-sex functions available on dating apps, such as HIV-status disclosure fields, as well as sexual health information and resources.

“[HIV phobia] is probably the most intense, subvert bigotry I think you could experience,” Joseph Monroe Jr., a 48-year-old living in the Bronx, told Uncloseted Media.

On dating apps, men have messaged him things like, “You look like you’ve got that thing” and “Go ahead and infect someone else.”

Monroe has also dealt with misinformed people who rudely opine about how he contracted the virus: “Who fucked you? That’s how you got it, right?” people will say to him.

“You end up internalizing all these stereotypes about who gets HIV — that you were promiscuous, that you didn’t care about yourself, that you did something wrong,” says Smith. “You carry that in, and then you have to relearn: ‘No, I didn’t. This is just a health condition.’”

What HIV acceptance looks like and raising awareness

For those living with HIV, acceptance feels far away.

“You’re living under this threat of HIV and the threat that others find you threatening. It inhabits you socially and sexually,” Koester says. “People are hunkering down. Not putting themselves out there and having a mediocre quality of life. To have a sense of empowerment, you have to be legitimate and seen in the world and it’s hard to do that with the stigma that exists.”

Researchers say the path forward lies as much in conversation as in medicine.

Koester says she talks about HIV and PrEP anywhere she can, including in salons, cafes and restaurants. “Whenever I get into a cab with someone, I’m going to bring up HIV so the driver gets accustomed to hearing about it. … We have a long way to go in terms of exposure and awareness and every little bit helps.”

Part of this lies in increasing awareness through targeted marketing campaigns. PrEP is still profoundly misunderstood outside major urban centers, with uneven uptake among minority groups and usage gaps in the Bible Belt. And a 2022 U.S. survey found that 54.5 percent of people living with HIV didn’t know what U=U meant, and less than half of Americans agree that people living with HIV who are on proper medications cannot transmit the virus.

While eradicating stigma is slow, there is hope for acceptance.

Years after Jack’s diagnosis, in 2021, he told a man he was on a third date with that he was HIV-positive but undetectable. His date’s reply was almost casual:

“Oh — is that it? I thought you were going to say you had a boyfriend or something. I’m on PrEP. You’re fine.”

“It felt so good to hear him say that and accept me,” says Jack. “I was like, ‘This is my person. You’re my person.’” One year later, they got married.

Back in Florida, 19-year-old Cody Nester isn’t feeling this acceptance. He still scrolls past profiles that read “Only negative guys” and tries to ignore the hateful messages.

“It still hurts, but I know it’s coming from fear,” he says. “I wasn’t too informed about HIV before I got it. … When I got it, I really jumped into the rabbit hole and began to learn. I really do think [HIV and stigma] is because people are not knowledgeable. … When people don’t know details, they tend to get scared.”

Additional reporting by Nandika Chatterjee.

Continue Reading

Health

Developing countries to receive breakthrough HIV prevention drug at low cost

Announcement coincided with UN General Assembly

Published

on

(Bigstock photo)

Philanthropic organizations on Wednesday announced two agreements with Indian pharmaceutical companies that will allow a breakthrough HIV prevention drug to become available in developing countries for $40 a year per patient.

The New York Times notes Unitaid, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, and Wits RHI reached an agreement with Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories to distribute lenacapavir. The Gates Foundation and Hetero brokered a separate deal.

Unitaid, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, Wits RHI, and the Gates Foundation announced their respective agreements against the backdrop of the U.N. General Assembly.

Lenacapavir users inject the drug twice a year.

UNAIDS in a press release notes lenacapavir in the U.S. currently costs $28,000 a year per person.

“This is a watershed moment,” said UNAIDS Executive Director Winnie Byanyima in a statement. “A price of USD 40 per person per year is a leap forward that will help to unlock the revolutionary potential of long-acting HIV medicines.”

The State Department earlier this month announced PEPFAR will distribute lenacapavir in countries with high HIV prevalence rates. A press release notes Gilead Sciences, which manufactures the drug, is “offering this product to PEPFAR and the Global Fund at cost and without profit.”

Continue Reading

Popular