Connect with us

Local

Md. House debating marriage

Final vote set for Friday; more heated debate expected

Published

on

The Maryland House of Delegates began floor debate onĀ the marriage equality bill at 11 a.m. Friday. The atmosphere in the chamber Ā is tense amid speculation that there are only 69 or 70 votes — 71 are required for passage.

So far this morning, several Republicans have taken to the floor to denounce the bill, including Del. Emmett Burns who claims his life has been threatened due to his opposition.

The Blade will update this page as developments warrant.

PREVIOUS COVERAGE:

A bill to allow same-sex couples to marry survived an attempt to kill or weaken it through amendments in the Maryland House of Delegates on Wednesday and was expected to come up for a final vote Friday.

The amendments were introduced during the opening round of debate in the chamber on the Civil Marriage Protection Act. AĀ vote on the bill was initially set for Thursday, but House Speaker Michael Busch (D-Anne Arundel County) moved it back to Friday as supporters scrambled to line up the 71 votes needed for passage.

ā€œI feel very confident that weā€™re going to get to 71,ā€ said Del. Luke Clippinger (D-Baltimore City), one of seven openly gay members of the House of Delegates.

Others following the bill have expressed concern that support in the House began to erode after the Senate passed the measure last month and Gov. Martin Oā€™Malley reiterated his commitment to sign it.

Del. Heather Mizuer (D-Montgomery County), a lesbian, said the defeat by supporters of four hostile amendments during Wednesday morningā€™s opening round was a good sign because it showed supporters had the strength to stop attempts to derail the bill. But she cautioned that more amendments were expected during Fridayā€™s session.

Del. Aisha Braveboy (D-Prince Georgeā€™s County) introduced what backers of the bill considered the most threatening of the proposed amendments.

Saying she wanted to ensure that voters rather than lawmakers have the final say on the issue, Braveboy said her amendment would accomplish that by converting the marriage bill into a proposed state constitutional amendment calling for legalizing same-sex marriage. Marylandā€™s constitution requires that all proposed amendments to theĀ constitution be placed before voters in a referendum.

Supporters of the marriage bill, led by Del. Kathleen Dumais (D-Montgomery County), the vice chair of the House Judiciary Committee which has jurisdiction over the bill, noted that a vote by the House to convert the bill into a constitutional amendment would send it back to committee. With most observers believing support for such a constitutional amendment is lacking in the committee, Dumais and other backers of the marriage bill said Braveboyā€™s amendment would effectively kill the bill.

The amendment was defeated by a roll-call vote of 72 to 63.

Among those voting for it were Delegates Jill Carter (D-Baltimore City) and Tiffany Alston (D-Prince Georgeā€™s County), two of three original co-sponsors of the marriage bill who stunned supporters last week by announcing they were considering withdrawing their support.

Del. Sam Arora (D-Montgomery County), who joined Carter and Alston in saying he was about to withdraw his support for the bill, changed his mind following a firestorm of criticism from residents of his district. He issued a statementĀ last weekĀ saying he would vote for the bill in committee and on the House floor, with the expectation that voters would have the final say in an expected referendum, which he favors.

Arora voted against the Braveboy amendment on Wednesday but voted for another amendment calling for allowing private social services agencies to refuse to provide adoption, foster care or other services if providing such services ā€œwould violate the entityā€™s religious beliefs.ā€

Although the amendment did not specifically mention gay adoptions, LGBT activists said they believed it was aimed at using the marriage equality bill as a vehicle forĀ weakening the stateā€™s existing adoption policies. The existing polices prohibit adoption agencies from discriminating against same-sex couples or gay or lesbian single parents seeking to adopt if they meet the same eligibility requirements as heterosexuals seeking to adopt.

The adoption related amendment, introduced by Del. John Donoghue (D-Washington County), lost by a vote of 79 to 58. Alston voted for the amendment; Carter voted against it.

An amendment introduced by Del. Kathryn Afzali (R-Frederick County) called for allowing parents of public school children to excuse a child from attending classes or instruction ā€œinvolving materials that promote same-sex marriage.ā€ The amendment also called for allowing a teacher to decline to teach such a class or materials.

Afzali and others supporting the amendment argued that teachers and parents should be given the right to opt out of such classes or instructional programs if same-sex marriage is contrary to their religious or moral beliefs.

Similar to her arguments against the adoption amendment, Dumais said curriculum related policies for the public schools were not germane to a marriage equality bill and should be left to locally elected school boards or the stateā€™s education department to decide.

The amendment lost by a vote of 86 to 54, with Alston, Carter and Arora voting against it.

The fourth amendment targeting the marriage bill, introduced by Del. Andrew Serafini (R-Washington County) called for changing the billā€™s name from the Civil Marriage Protection Act to the ā€œSame-Sex Marriage Act.ā€ Serafini said his proposed name was a more accurate description of what the bill would do.

The amendment was defeated by a vote of 85 to 52. Alston voted for it, Arora voted against it, and Carter did not cast a vote on the amendment.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

District of Columbia

Reenactment of 1965 gay rights protest at White House set for April 17

Event to mark 60thĀ anniversary of historic picketing

Published

on

Among those expected to participate in the April 17 White House reenactment picketing is longtime D.C. LGBTQ rights advocate Paul Kuntzler, who is shown here participating in a similar reenactment event in front of the White House one year ago. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

D.C.ā€™s Rainbow History Project is inviting members of the local LGBTQ community and its supporters to participate in a reenactment of what it calls the historic 1965 first gay rights protest outside the White House.

The event is scheduled to begin at 4 p.m. Thursday, April 17 on the sidewalk in front of the White House.

In a statement, Rainbow History Project says the 1965 protest was organized by local gay rights pioneers Frank Kameny and Lilli Vincenz on behalf of the Mattachine Society of Washington, one of D.C.ā€™s first gay rights groups that Kameny co-founded in the early 1960s.

ā€œLed by Dr. Kameny and Dr. Vincenz, picketers demanded action on the Mattachine Societyā€™s four major issues: the exclusion of homosexuals from Federal employment; the punitive policies of the U.S. Military; blanket denial of security clearances to gay people; and government refusal to meet with the LGBTQ community,ā€ the statement says.  

The statement referred to the titles of Kameny and Vincenz in connection with their academic doctorate degrees  

ā€œAlthough Dr. Kameny died in 2011, and Dr. Vincenz in 2023, Rainbow History Project and its all-volunteer corps will picket in their honor and demonstrate there is a new generation of young activists ready to take up their signs and their fight for equal rights for all LGBTQ people,ā€ the statement says.

Among those expected to participate in the April 17 White House reenactment picketing is longtime D.C. LGBTQ rights advocate Paul Kuntzler, who is the last known survivor of the 1965 White House gay rights protest. Kuntzler was expected to carry a picket sign similar to the one he carried in 1965.

In its research on the 1965 gay White House protest, Rainbow History Project learned of a letter that Kameny sent to then President Lyndon B. Johnson outlining the demands of the White House protesters.

ā€œWe ask, Mr. President, for what all American citizens ā€“ singly and collectively ā€“ have the right to ask,ā€ the Kameny letter states. ā€œThat our problems be given fair, unbiased considerationā€¦consideration in which we, ourselves, are allowed to participate actively and are invited to do so.ā€

The RHP statement says the group ā€œwill carry replicas of the original protest signs and hand out literature explaining the picket to passersby and tourists.ā€ Ā Ā 

Continue Reading

Maryland

FreeState Justice: Transgender activist ā€˜hijackedā€™ Mooreā€™s Transgender Day of Visibility event

Maryland Commission on LGBTQIA+ Affairs describes Lee Blinderā€™s comments as ā€˜call to actionā€™

Published

on

Lee Blinder, founding executive director of Trans Maryland, speaks to Maryland Gov. Wes Moore during a ceremony for the International Day for Transgender Visibility. Blinder called out the governor for not backing up his words with action.Ā (Photo by Jessica Gallagher for the Baltimore Banner)

FreeState Justice on April 11 released a statement criticizing the way that Trans Maryland Executive Director Lee Blinder treated Gov. Wes Moore during a Transgender Day of Visibility event.

FreeState Justice was extremely disappointed with the criticisms of Moore on the Transgender Day of Visibility, saying it was ā€œhijacked by public hostilityā€ by Blinder. The Baltimore Banner reported how Blinder ā€œlaid out how the Democratic governor has let down transgender Marylanders by not putting money in the budget and not backing needed policy changes.ā€

The Washington Blade interviewed Blinder after the March 31 event.

ā€œThe intention of what I shared is to show to the governor that this is a community in distress. You know, we are in a real state of emergency for the trans community and there are very few opportunities that the community has to share this directly with the governor.ā€ Blinder told the Blade. ā€œWeā€™re really grateful to the governor for everything that heā€™s done in the past for this community, but the circumstances have changed and we really need to see very specific actions taken in order to ensure this community has the ability to exist in public space.ā€

FreeState Justice said Moore did not deserve such criticisms during the event and added in a Blade oped it is ā€œtime for new leadership on the Maryland LGBTQIA+ Commission. Leadership that values and prioritizes coalition over conflict. Leadership that invites feedback and shares power. Leadership that understands how Annapolis operates, how budgets are constructed, and how community victories are won.ā€

ā€œWeā€™re not saying donā€™t challenge power. Weā€™re saying do it with purpose. Do it with facts. Do it with a strategy. If youā€™re going to call yourself a leader in this movement, show us the policy platform. Show us the data. Show us the budget line. Show us the work,ā€ wrote FreeState Justice.

The Maryland Commission on LGBTQIA+ Affairs has met to address FreeState Justiceā€™s statements. 

ā€œDuring the Transgender Day of Visibility ceremony at the State House, the commissionā€™s chair offered remarks reflecting the real fears, concerns, and hopes of the trans community. These remarks were not a call-out, but a call to action,ā€ the commission said in their call to action statement it sent to the Blade. ā€œThe chairā€™s words echoed the thousands of voices weā€™ve heard across the state through phone calls, emails, and messages on social media to our staff, commissioners, and their affiliated organizations.ā€

The statement outlines what the call to action entails, addressing what the commission found to be the most pressing issues for transgender Marylanders. They include a lack of dedicated funding, barriers to affirming healthcare, housing insecurity and homelessness, discrimination in education and employment, and escalating violence, harassment, and hate.

ā€œWe remain deeply committed to working in partnership with the Moore-Miller administration, the General Assembly, state agencies, nonprofit organizations, and community partners to ensure LGBTQIA+ Marylanders are seen, protected, and supported in policy, budget, and in practice,ā€ reads the statement.

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

Final push to raise funds, fill D.C. hotels as WorldPride nears

ā€˜We would have liked to see the city fully sold out at this pointā€™

Published

on

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser budgeted $5 million for WorldPride, which was approved by the Council. Capital Pride Alliance is now working to raise an additional $2 million. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

A final push to raise money and fill D.C. hotel rooms is underway with WorldPride 2025 just over a month away.

The Capital Pride Alliance, the D.C.-based group thatā€™s organizing WorldPride 2025 in the nationā€™s capital thatā€™s scheduled to take place May 17-June 8 launched what it says is one of several fundraising campaigns in a full-page ad in the Washington Post on April 1.

With a large headline declaring, ā€œHate Is No Joke,ā€ a message in the ad states, ā€œDecades of progress in human rights are under coordinated, systematic attack. Today itā€™s focused on gender, sexual orientation, and race. But whatā€™s next?ā€

The message then states, ā€œTake Action. Take a stand. Donate now at WorldPrideDC.org/give.ā€

That site says its goal is to raise $2 million. As of April 14, the site says $12,041 had been raised from 69 donors.

In response to a request by the Washington Blade for comment on what prompted this particular fundraising campaign, Capital Pride Alliance released a statement saying the campaign was part of its ongoing effort to promote WorldPride and its multiple events.

ā€œThe Hate Is No Joke campaign is one of multiple fundraising campaigns that have been planned around the lead-up to WorldPride 2025,ā€ the statement says. ā€œSimilar to CPAā€™s annual Giving Tuesday campaign and the current Taste of Pride citywide initiative, this campaign is intended to raise awareness for and funds to support WorldPride.ā€

The statement says the ā€œHate Is No Jokeā€ campaign is being led by the local event planning company Linder Global Events, which D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser retained to work with Capital Pride Alliance in organizing WorldPride 2025.

Capital Pride Alliance Executive Director Ryan Bos told the Blade last month that CPA had set up a budget of between $15 million and $20 million for WorldPride 2025, with much of the funding coming from corporate donors. At the request of MayorĀ Bowser, the D.C. Council approved $5 million in city funding for WorldPride.

ā€œAnd like we do every year for an organization like ours, which is event based, we do our best every year to come under budget,ā€ Bos said in referring to the cityā€™s annual Capital Pride celebration and events. ā€œSo, we are doing our best to save whenever we can and to ensure that we have a safe and successful WorldPride,ā€ he said.

In its statement responding to the Bladeā€™s inquiry about the Hate Is No Joke fundraising campaign, Capital Pride Alliance said it has learned through the international LGBTQ advocacy organization InterPride, which plays a role in organizing WorldPride events, that visitors from at least 20 countries were expected to come to D.C. for WorldPride 2025.

Among those countries were Canada, Mexico, and several others from Europe, Asia, and Africa, including Uganda and Zimbabwe, as well as India, Spain, Italy, United Kingdom, China, and Thailand.

Elliott Ferguson, president and CEO of Destination D.C., an organization that promotes tourism, visitation, and events in D.C., including events like WorldPride, said he is seeing signs that hotel reservations are increasing from visitors planning to come to D.C. for WorldPride. But he said he cannot predict whether as many as 2 million or more visitors will come as WorldPride organizers had predicted earlier this year.

At Capital Pride Allianceā€™s suggestion, Ferguson spoke with the Blade to address the question of whether the controversial statements and policies of President Donald Trump on world trade issues and tariffs involving longtime U.S. allies like Canada and Mexico as well as the Trump administrationā€™s hostile policies targeting the transgender community would prompt people, especially those from foreign countries, to choose not to come to D.C. for WorldPride.

ā€œIā€™m not sure,ā€ Ferguson told the Blade in an interview. ā€œYou know, I think thatā€™s the gray area in terms of how many people will come,ā€ he said.

ā€œBut reservations are being made. Weā€™re seeing more of an uptick,ā€ he told the Blade. ā€œAnd we remain optimistic as WorldPride organizers and Capital Pride organizers are really focusing on the celebration of the community thatā€™s happening in the city,ā€ he said.

Ferguson said he and Destination D.C. were joining WorldPride organizers in putting out the message that if people disagree with the Trump administrationā€™s policies on LGBTQ-related issues or any other issues, they should turn out for WorldPride to protest those policies.

Capital Pride officials have pointed out that among the many events planned for WorldPride is a national LGBTQ rights march on Washington that will begin at the Lincoln Memorial and travel to the U.S. Capitol.

ā€œThereā€™s a lot of consternation and concern about a lot of issues that have been brought to our attention by a lot of international travelers, including those that were looking at coming for WorldPride,ā€ Ferguson said.

ā€œWhat weā€™ve said to them is, you know, coming to WorldPride from a global perspective focusing on freedom of speech and First Amendment rights here in the U.S. is a huge part of why you should be here,ā€ he added. 

ā€œSo, as we talk to hotels, we would have liked to see the city fully sold out at this point,ā€ he said. ā€œBut we are seeing momentum in terms of reservations being made and people coming to Washington.ā€ 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular