Local
D.C. anti-bullying bill clears key vote
Training requirement eliminated to cut cost of measure


āThe bill delivers a strong message that this city will not tolerate bullying ā especially for our LGBT youth,ā said Council member Tommy Wells. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)
A D.C. Council committee voted unanimously on April 20 to approve the Youth Bullying Prevention Act of 2012 and to send it to the full Council for an expected preliminary vote on May 1.
āThe bill delivers a strong message that this city will not tolerate bullying ā especially for our LGBT youth ā in our schools, libraries, recreation centers and where the city serves its youth,ā said Council member Tommy Wells (D-Ward 6).
Wells is chair of the Councilās Committee on Libraries, Parks, Recreation and Planning, which worked with the mayorās office and LGBT advocates over the past year to make significant revisions to the bill before voting to approve it last week.
With the city facing an expected budget shortfall next year, Wells and his fellow committee members were faced with the need to make changes to lower the cost of implementing the bill.
The revised version of the bill, for example,Ā eliminates a provision in the earlier version that stated, “To the extent that funds are appropriated for these purposes,” various city agencies, including the public school system, “shall provide training on the agency’s harassment, intimidation or bullying policies to employees andĀ volunteers who have significant contact with students or the public…”
The revisedĀ bill approved by the committee says the public schools and other city agencies “may … provide training on bullying prevention to all employees and volunteers who have significant contact with youth.”
Alison Gill, public policy manager for the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, or GLSEN, which worked with Wellsā office to help revise the bill, said the training requirement in the earlier version of the bill was contingent upon the availability of city funds and the elimination of that provision would have a minimal impact on the overall bill.
āI think itās excellent,ā Gill said of the revised bill. āThe new bill addresses the issues the community had raised over the past year.ā
Among those issues, Gill said, was the need to broaden the definition of bullying from the original bill to include all of the categories of individuals protected under the D.C. Human Rights Act andĀ the need to strengthen the reporting requirements for schools and city agencies to keep track of bullying incidents.
The committee vote came just over one week after Mayor Vincent Gray announced he would put into place a citywide anti-bullying initiative through his executive authority as mayor. His proposal includes the creation of a special task force on bullying and the development of a model anti-bullying policy and standards to be used by city agencies with jurisdiction over youth.
The legislation approved by Wellsā committee, among other things, also calls for creating a bullying task force and developing a comprehensive anti-bullying policy for city agencies.
Gill said the mayor’sĀ task force and bullying polices would beĀ adopted as those required under the bill, with an expected smooth transition once the bill becomes law.
Eleven of the Council’sĀ 13 members signed on as co-introducers or co-sponsors of the earlier version of the bill. Supporters say the new version is expected to pass the full Council by an overwhelming margin.
A summary of the billās provisions released by Wellsā office says the measure includes these key components:
⢠The establishment and implementation of a bullying prevention policy, including reporting and investigation guidelines, that specifically covers all youth, including youth of color, LGBT youth, and youth with disabilities.
⢠The establishment of an appeal process for a party dissatisfied with the outcome of an initial investigation of a bullying incident.
⢠A clear prohibition against retaliation against a target of bullying, a witness to a bullying incident, or someone who reports an incident of bullying.
⢠The granting of legal immunity from lawsuits against an employee, volunteer or youth who āin good faithā reports an incident of bullying.
The bill defines bullying as āany severe, persistent act or conduct, whether physical, electronic, or verbal that ⦠shall be reasonably predicted to place the youth in reasonable fear of physical harm to his or her person or property; cause a substantial detrimental effect on the youthās physical or mental health; substantially interfere with the youthās academic performance or attendance; or substantially interfere with the youthās ability to participate in or benefit from the services, activities, or privileges provided by an agency, educational institution, or grantee.ā
It defines āgranteeā as an entity or contractor that provides services, activities or privileges to youth on behalf of the city.
Wells said at the time the committee voted to approve the bill that a financial impact statement prepared by the Office of the Chief Financial Officer shows that implementing the measure would cost the public school system $36,000 in fiscal year 2014 and $31,000 in both fiscal years 2015 and 2016.
Wells said public school officials indicated the system ācannot absorb this amount,ā requiring that the Council and mayor identify other sources of funding.
Wellsā office said last month that an inability to identify funding sources for the bill was among the reasons it has been stalled in committee for more than a year. The revised bill is believed to be far less costly than the earlier version.
āI am confident we will resolve this issue before the bill has its first reading at the full Council,ā Wells said.
The committee members who voted to approve the bill, in addition to Wells, were David Catania (I-At-Large), Phil Mendelson (D-At-Large) and Vincent Orange (D-At-Large).
District of Columbia
Two charged with assaulting, robbing gay man at D.C. CVS store
Incident occurred after suspects, victim āexchanged wordsā at bar

D.C. police just after 1 a.m. on April 10 arrested two men for allegedly assaulting and robbing a gay man inside a CVS store at 1418 P St., N.W., according to a police report and charging documents filed in D.C. Superior Court.
The charging documents state that the alleged assault and robbery occurred a short time after the three men āexchanged wordsā at the gay bar Number 9, which is located across the street from the CVS.
The arrested men are identified in the charging documents as Marquel Jose Diaz, 27, of Northwest D.C., and Lorenzo Jesse Scafidi, 21, of Elizabeth City, N.C. An affidavit in support of the arrest for Diaz says Diaz and the victim āwere previously in a relationship for a year.ā
Court records show Diaz was charged with Simple Assault, Theft Second Degree, and Possession of a Controlled Substance. The court records show the controlled substance charge was filed by police after Diaz was found to be in possession of a powdered substance that tested positive for cocaine.
Scafidi was charged with Simple Assault and Theft Second Degree, the court records show.
The D.C. police report for the incident does not list it as a suspected hate crime.
The court records show both men pleaded not guilty to the charges against them at a Superior Court arraignment on the day of their arrest on April 10. The records show they were released by a judge while awaiting trial with an order that they āstay awayā from the victim. They are scheduled to return to court for a status hearing on May 21.
The separate police-filed affidavits in support of the arrests of both Diaz and Scafidi each state that the two men and the victim āexchanged wordsā inside the Number 9 bar. The two documents state that both men then entered the CVS store after the victim went to the store a short time earlier.
Scafidi ācame into the CVS shortly after and entered the candy aisle and slammed Complainant 1 [the victim] to the ground causing Complainant 1ās phone to fall out of CP-1ās pocket,ā one of the two affidavits says. It says Scafidi āagain picked up CP-1 and slammed him to the ground.ā
The affidavit in support of Diazās arrest says Diaz also followed the victim to the CVS store after words were exchanged at the bar. It says that after Scafidi allegedly knocked the victim down in the candy aisle Diaz picked up the victimās phone, āswung onā the victim āwhile he was still on the ground,ā and picked up the victimās watch before he and Scafidi fled the scene.
Without saying why, the two arrest affidavits say Diaz and Scafidi returned to the scene and were arrested by police after the victim and at least one witness identified them as having assaulted and robbed the victim.
Attorneys representing the two arrested men did not respond to phone messages from the Washington Blade seeking comment and asking whether their clients dispute the allegations against them.
The victim also did not respond to attempts by the Blade to obtain a comment from him. The police report says the victim is a resident of Fairfax, Va.
District of Columbia
Bowser calls for āextraordinaryā response to reduction in D.C. budget
Impact on city funding for LGBTQ programs and grants unclear

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser on April 15 issued an executive order calling for āextraordinary actions,ā including āsignificant cuts in District Government services,ā to address a decision by Congress to cut the cityās current budget by $1.1 billion.
The nine-page executive order points out that these actions became necessary after the U.S. House of Representatives has so far declined to vote on a free-standing bill approved by the U.S. Senate last month that would restore the $1.1 billion D.C. budget cut initially approved by the House.
In addition to large-scale cuts in city services, the mayoral order says the congressionally imposed city budget cut will bring about city āhiring freezes, financial impacts to employees, reductions and terminations in contracts and grants, and closures of District Government facilities.ā
The order adds, āThese are unprecedented actions given that the District itself adopted and is able to implement a fully balanced budget, but they are necessary due to the Congressional cut to the Districtās budget and its inaction in timely fixing its legislative error.ā
The House adjourned this week on a recess until the end of April, and congressional observers say it is unclear whether the majority Republican House will take up the Senate bill to undo the D.C. budget cut when the House returns from its recess. President Donald Trump has called on the House to approve the bill to restore the full D.C. budget.
Among the D.C. LGBTQ organizations and those providing services to the LGBTQ community that receive D.C. government funding and that could be impacted by the budget cuts are Capital Pride Alliance, which is organizing WorldPride 2025 set to take place in D.C. next month; and Whitman-Walker Health, one of the cityās largest private healthcare organizations that provides medical services for LGBTQ clients.
Also receiving city funding are the Wanda Alston Foundation, which provides housing services for LGBTQ people; and the LGBTQ youth advocacy and services organization SMYAL.
Spokespersons for the four organizations couldnāt immediately be reached to determine if they knew whether the soon-to-be implemented budget cuts would have an impact on the city funding they currently receive.
In response to questions from news reporters during an April 15 press conference call to discuss the Bowser executive order, Jenny Reed, director of the D.C. Office of Budget and Performance Management, said details on specific programs or funding allocations set to be cut would not be known until the mayor submits to the D.C. Council her Supplemental FY 2025 budget along with her proposed FY 2026 budget.
Reed was joined at the press briefing by Lindsey Parker, Mayor Bowserās chief of staff; and Tomas Talamante, director of the Office of Intergovernmental Affairs.
They and other city officials have said the impact of the congressionally imposed city budget cut was expected to be lessened but remain highly problematic by Bowserās decision to invoke a 2009 law that allows the city to increase its own spending without approval by Congress under certain circumstances.
The mayor has said under that law, the city would need to cut its FY 2025 budget by $410 million rather than by $1.1 billion. It couldnāt immediately be determined whether House Republicans, who initiated the requirement that the D.C. budget be cut by $1.1 billion, would challenge the mayorās plan to invoke the 2009 law to reduce the size of the budget cut.
āWithout the ability to fully execute the Fiscal Year 2025 budget as adopted and approved by the District, this gap will force reductions in critical services provided by our largest agencies, including the Metropolitan Police Department and the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department,ā the mayorās executive order states.
āThe District will continue to work with members of the House of Representatives to urge them to vote to fully restore the Districtās Fiscal year 2025 budget and will continue to work with President Trump to strongly encourage the House of Representatives to take that action,ā the order says.
District of Columbia
LGBTQ budget advocates fight for D.C. resources in a tough fiscal year
‘Trying to preserve life-saving services’ amid $1 billion cut

The months and days leading up to June are especially busy for LGBTQ Washingtonians. For one group, the DC LGBT Budget Coalition, which works year-round to ensure LGBTQ residents are represented and financially supported by the D.C. government, this time of year is their Super Bowl. Beginning in April, the D.C. Council and Mayorās Office hold budget hearings for the next fiscal year.
With D.C.’s budget now under review, the Washington Blade spoke with Heidi Ellis, coordinator of the DC LGBT Budget Coalition, about the groupās top priorities and their push to ensure continued support for queer communities.
āThe LGBTQ Budget Coalition was founded in 2020 at the height of the pandemic, as a way for the community to work together to advocate for key funding and policy changes,ā Ellis said. āWe recognized we were stronger together. A lot of groups are often pitted against each other for resources and dollars. This coalition was founded out of a need for unity. Since then, weāve successfully advocated for more than $20 million in dedicated LGBTQ investments.ā
In addition to coordinating the coalition, Ellis is the founder and CEO of HME Consulting & Advocacy, a firm that helps build coalitions and advance policy initiatives that address intersectional issues in the LGBTQ community. One of its most powerful tools, she explained, is direct outreach through community surveys.
āWe actually do community surveys to see what people need and whatās top of mind,ā Ellis said. āOf course, we also pay attention to the broader political landscape ā like the current threats to HIV funding. That helps us prioritize.ā
Because the coalition is comprised of more than 20 organizations across various sectors āhealthcare, housing, community organizing ā Ellis said its diversity enables it to connect grassroots needs to potential policy solutions.
āOur coalition includes service providers, community groups, health and housing advocates-folks who are deeply plugged into whatās happening on the ground,ā she said. āThey help determine our direction. We know we donāt represent every queer person in D.C., but our coalition reflects a wide range of identities and experiences.ā
The insights gathered through those surveys ultimately inform the coalitionās annual budget proposal, which is submitted to the Council and mayor.
āThatās how we got to our FY26 priorities,ā she said. āThis year, more than ever, weāre fighting to protect what weāve already secured ā funding and policies weāve had to fight for in the past. We know thereās concern around this budget.ā
One of the challenges this year is that the D.C. governmentās operating budget and some of its legislation must be approved by Congress. With a projected decline in tax revenue and a Republican-controlled Congress that has historically opposed LGBTQ funding, the Coalition has had to think strategically.
āEven before the situation on the Hill, the CFO projected lower revenue,ā Ellis said. āThat meant cuts to social programs were already coming. And now, with the $1 billion slashed from D.C.ās budget due to the continuing resolution, weāre not only fighting for D.C.ās budget and autonomy, but also trying to preserve life-saving services. Our message is simple: Donāt forget about queer people.ā
This yearās proposal doesnāt include specific dollar figures. Instead, the Coalition outlines five funding priority areas: Healthcare, Employment & Economic Equity, Housing, Safety & Community Support, and Civil Rights.
Why no exact amounts? Ellis said itās because not all solutions are financial.
āSome of our asks donāt require new funding. Others build on existing programs-weāre asking whether the current use of funds is the most effective. Weāre also proposing policy changes that wouldnāt cost extra but could make a real difference. Itās about using what we have better,ā she said.
When drafting the proposal, the Coalition tries to prioritize those with the most pressing and intersecting needs.
āOur perspective is: If we advocate for the most vulnerable, others benefit too,ā Ellis said. āTake LGBTQ seniors. Some may have done well in life but now face housing insecurity or struggle to access affordable healthcare. Many in our coalition are elders who fought on the frontlines during the AIDS epidemic. They bring critical historical context and remind us that Black and brown communities bore the brunt of that crisis.ā
āI love our coalition because it keeps us accountable to the moment,ā she added. āIf we center those most marginalized, we can make an impact that lifts everyone.ā
In addition to healthcare and housing, safety remains a top concern. The Coalition has fought to maintain funding for the Violence Prevention and Response Team (VPART), a city-supported group that includes MPD, community-based organizations, and the Mayorās Office of LGBTQ Affairs. VPART responds to crimes affecting the LGBTQ community and connects victims to legal, healthcare, and housing services.
āWeāve pushed to make VPART more proactive, not just reactive,ā Ellis said. āThe funding weāve secured has helped survivors get the support they need. Cutting that funding now would undo progress weāre just beginning to see.ā
At the end of the day, Ellis emphasized that this process is about far more than spreadsheets.
āA budget is a moral document,ā she said. āIf weāre not represented, youāre telling us our lives donāt matter at a time when we need protection the most. When people canāt get food, medicine, housing ā that has a devastating impact. These are vital services.ā
The DC LGBT Budget Coalition is urging residents to support a letter-writing campaign to D.C. Council members and the mayor. You can send a letter here: https://actionnetwork.org/letters/fully-fund-dcs-lgbtq-communities
Read the full FY26 budget proposal here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bTrENnc4ZazJTO6LPrQ3lZkF02QNIIf1/view
-
The White House5 days ago
White House does not ‘respond’ to reporters’ requests with pronouns included
-
District of Columbia2 days ago
Reenactment of 1965 gay rights protest at White House set for April 17
-
Hungary2 days ago
Hungarian MPs amend constitution to ban public LGBTQ events
-
Maryland2 days ago
FreeState Justice: Transgender activist āhijackedā Mooreās Transgender Day of Visibility event