Connect with us

Local

Clergy speak out against Md. same-sex marriage law

Religious leaders gathered at Beltsville hotel four days before Election Day

Published

on

Maryland Marriage Alliance, Derek McCoy, Question 6, same sex marriage, gay marriage, gay news, Washington Blade
Maryland Marriage Alliance, Derek McCoy, Question 6, same sex marriage, gay marriage, gay news, Washington Blade

Maryland Marriage Alliance Chair Derek McCoy speaks during Beltsville press conference on Friday with dozens of clergy against Question 6. (Washington Blade photo by Michael K. Lavers)

BELTSVILLE, Md.ā€”Dozens of religious leaders from across Maryland and D.C. gathered in Prince Georgeā€™s County on Friday to express their opposition to Question 6.

ā€œWeā€™re all here today not because of what weā€™re against, but because of what weā€™re for,ā€ said Rev. Frank Reid of Bethel AME Church in Baltimore during a press conference at the Sheraton Washington North Hotel in Beltsville.

He stressed Question 6 opponents have dealt with the issue ā€œvery positivelyā€ and ā€œtolerantlyā€ without ā€œputting anybody down or calling anybody names.ā€ Reid added there is what he described as confusion going into Election Day.

ā€œThe first confusion is this is not just a Question 6 election,ā€ he said. ā€œThis is also a presidential election. And there are many who want to confuse us and say that if you vote for this or against this you are voting for or against a certain party or a certain candidate. That is not true. This is a faith and freedom issue and it is possible to vote for a candidate and vote for or against Question 6, so we donā€™t want any confusion that we are here against one candidate or for another candidate. That is not our concern. Our focus is very clear on Question 6: Vote against Question 6 and then vote for whatever candidate you want.ā€

Bishop Angel NuƱez of Bilingual Christian Church in Baltimore questioned whether Question 6 will protect religious freedom as Gov. Martin Oā€™Malley, Revs. Delman Coates of Mount Ennon Baptist Church in Prince Georgeā€™s County and DontĆ© Hickman of Southern Baptist Church in Baltimore and others who support the law continue to maintain.

ā€œIt seems like the language in the ballot goes out of its way to convince voters that churches will not be affected. In reality, non-profits, individuals and private businesses are at risk,ā€ said NuƱez. ā€œIn the actual law, it is clear that any church that receives state funds is not safe.ā€

Reverend Pierre Bynum of the Family Research Council argued Catholic Charities was forced to end adoptions in several states because they refused to place children with gay parents. He said more than 60,000 people have signed a petition urging Gallaudet University to reinstate Dr. Angela McCaskill, a senior administrator who remains on administrative leave for supporting the referendum on Marylandā€™s same-sex marriage law.

ā€œThe problem is weā€™re going to see that over and over and over times thousands,ā€ said Bynum. ā€œSince just this petition went out to give people an opportunity to vote, thereā€™s so many different things that have taken place including all of the people who signed the petition having their names published in a newspaper and getting telephone calls and visits from people who are antagonistic toward them.ā€

A Goucher College poll released earlier this week found 55 percent of Marylanders support marriage rights for same-sex couples in the state, compared to 39 percent who oppose them. A Baltimore Sun survey conducted between Oct. 20-23 noted only 46 percent of respondents would vote for the law.

Benjamin Jealous, president of the Baltimore-based National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and NAACP Chair Emeritus Julian Bond have both pointed out Question 6 protects religious freedom. Ā 

Reverend Alfred Deas, Jr., of Metropolitan AME Church in Cumberland disagreed with the civil rights organizationā€™s support of Question 6 and marriage rights for same-sex couples.

ā€œI unfortunately believe that they have stepped out on I believe the wrong side of history,ā€ he said, noting he took part in the 1963 March on Washington with a local NAACP chapter. ā€œIt is not a civil rights issue. Gays have not gone through what weā€™ve gone through. And to compare the two is just wrong.ā€

The press conference also took place two weeks after Rev. Robert Anderson of Colonial Baptist Church in Randallstown suggested during a town hall meeting on Question 6 that those who practice homosexuality and approve it are ā€œdeserving of death.ā€ A California pastor described gay men as ā€œpredatorsā€ who seek to indoctrinate children during an anti-gay marriage gathering that Family Research Council President Tony Perkins, Maryland Marriage Alliance Chair Derek McCoy, Bishop Harry Jackson of Hope Christian Church in Beltsville and roughly 100 others attended at a Baltimore church on Oct. 21.

McCoy again defended Anderson when the Washington Blade asked him and other assembled clergy to respond to criticisms over what Question 6 supporters maintain is the use of homophobic rhetoric against the law.

ā€œNobody here endorses violence, endorses bullying of any sort in any stance,ā€ said McCoy. ā€œWe stand collectively to love our community, to love the constituents who are in our churches and within our broader community in the state of Maryland.”

He said those who criticized Anderson’s use of scripture to speak against Question 6 misinterpreted his remarks.

“As a matter of fact, we believe when Dr. Anderson was using that, it was taken grossly out of context,ā€ said McCoy.

Pastor John K. Jenkins, Sr., of First Baptist Church of Glenarden in Upper Marlboro acknowledged the church has not previously ā€œresponded well to the homosexual lesbian community.” Reid referred to Michael Eric Dyson of Georgetown University who asked on MSNBC shortly after President Obama publicly backed marriage rights for same-sex couples whether those within the black church who oppose the issue want to become “sexual rednecks.”

ā€œThat kind of language has no place in America,ā€ he said. ā€œWe should be able to disagree without being disagreeable.ā€

Father Erik Arnold of the Archdiocese of Baltimore, Pastor Anthony Maclin of the Collective Empowerment Group in Riverdale, Jackson and an imam from the Islamic Center of Washington were among those who also attended the press conference.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

District of Columbia

LGBTQ budget advocates fight for D.C. resources in a tough fiscal year

‘Trying to preserve life-saving services’ amid $1 billion cut

Published

on

Heidi Ellis, coordinator of the DC LGBT Budget Coalition. (Photo courtesy of Heidi Ellis)

The months and days leading up to June are especially busy for LGBTQ Washingtonians. For one group, the DC LGBT Budget Coalition, which works year-round to ensure LGBTQ residents are represented and financially supported by the D.C. government, this time of year is their Super Bowl. Beginning in April, the D.C. Council and Mayorā€™s Office hold budget hearings for the next fiscal year.

With D.C.’s budget now under review, the Washington Blade spoke with Heidi Ellis, coordinator of the DC LGBT Budget Coalition, about the groupā€™s top priorities and their push to ensure continued support for queer communities.

ā€œThe LGBTQ Budget Coalition was founded in 2020 at the height of the pandemic, as a way for the community to work together to advocate for key funding and policy changes,ā€ Ellis said. ā€œWe recognized we were stronger together. A lot of groups are often pitted against each other for resources and dollars. This coalition was founded out of a need for unity. Since then, weā€™ve successfully advocated for more than $20 million in dedicated LGBTQ investments.ā€

In addition to coordinating the coalition, Ellis is the founder and CEO of HME Consulting & Advocacy, a firm that helps build coalitions and advance policy initiatives that address intersectional issues in the LGBTQ community. One of its most powerful tools, she explained, is direct outreach through community surveys.

ā€œWe actually do community surveys to see what people need and whatā€™s top of mind,ā€ Ellis said. ā€œOf course, we also pay attention to the broader political landscape ā€” like the current threats to HIV funding. That helps us prioritize.ā€

Because the coalition is comprised of more than 20 organizations across various sectors ā€”healthcare, housing, community organizing ā€” Ellis said its diversity enables it to connect grassroots needs to potential policy solutions.

ā€œOur coalition includes service providers, community groups, health and housing advocates-folks who are deeply plugged into whatā€™s happening on the ground,ā€ she said. ā€œThey help determine our direction. We know we donā€™t represent every queer person in D.C., but our coalition reflects a wide range of identities and experiences.ā€

The insights gathered through those surveys ultimately inform the coalitionā€™s annual budget proposal, which is submitted to the Council and mayor.

ā€œThatā€™s how we got to our FY26 priorities,ā€ she said. ā€œThis year, more than ever, weā€™re fighting to protect what weā€™ve already secured ā€” funding and policies weā€™ve had to fight for in the past. We know thereā€™s concern around this budget.ā€

One of the challenges this year is that the D.C. governmentā€™s operating budget and some of its legislation must be approved by Congress. With a projected decline in tax revenue and a Republican-controlled Congress that has historically opposed LGBTQ funding, the Coalition has had to think strategically.

ā€œEven before the situation on the Hill, the CFO projected lower revenue,ā€ Ellis said. ā€œThat meant cuts to social programs were already coming. And now, with the $1 billion slashed from D.C.ā€™s budget due to the continuing resolution, weā€™re not only fighting for D.C.ā€™s budget and autonomy, but also trying to preserve life-saving services. Our message is simple: Donā€™t forget about queer people.ā€

This yearā€™s proposal doesnā€™t include specific dollar figures. Instead, the Coalition outlines five funding priority areas: Healthcare, Employment & Economic Equity, Housing, Safety & Community Support, and Civil Rights.

Why no exact amounts? Ellis said itā€™s because not all solutions are financial.

ā€œSome of our asks donā€™t require new funding. Others build on existing programs-weā€™re asking whether the current use of funds is the most effective. Weā€™re also proposing policy changes that wouldnā€™t cost extra but could make a real difference. Itā€™s about using what we have better,ā€ she said.

When drafting the proposal, the Coalition tries to prioritize those with the most pressing and intersecting needs.

ā€œOur perspective is: If we advocate for the most vulnerable, others benefit too,ā€ Ellis said. ā€œTake LGBTQ seniors. Some may have done well in life but now face housing insecurity or struggle to access affordable healthcare. Many in our coalition are elders who fought on the frontlines during the AIDS epidemic. They bring critical historical context and remind us that Black and brown communities bore the brunt of that crisis.ā€

ā€œI love our coalition because it keeps us accountable to the moment,ā€ she added. ā€œIf we center those most marginalized, we can make an impact that lifts everyone.ā€

In addition to healthcare and housing, safety remains a top concern. The Coalition has fought to maintain funding for the Violence Prevention and Response Team (VPART), a city-supported group that includes MPD, community-based organizations, and the Mayorā€™s Office of LGBTQ Affairs. VPART responds to crimes affecting the LGBTQ community and connects victims to legal, healthcare, and housing services.

ā€œWeā€™ve pushed to make VPART more proactive, not just reactive,ā€ Ellis said. ā€œThe funding weā€™ve secured has helped survivors get the support they need. Cutting that funding now would undo progress weā€™re just beginning to see.ā€

At the end of the day, Ellis emphasized that this process is about far more than spreadsheets.

ā€œA budget is a moral document,ā€ she said. ā€œIf weā€™re not represented, youā€™re telling us our lives donā€™t matter at a time when we need protection the most. When people canā€™t get food, medicine, housing ā€” that has a devastating impact. These are vital services.ā€

The DC LGBT Budget Coalition is urging residents to support a letter-writing campaign to D.C. Council members and the mayor. You can send a letter here: https://actionnetwork.org/letters/fully-fund-dcs-lgbtq-communities

Read the full FY26 budget proposal here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bTrENnc4ZazJTO6LPrQ3lZkF02QNIIf1/view

Continue Reading

Arts & Entertainment

Washington Bladeā€™s Pride on the Pier returns bigger than everĀ with two-day WorldPride celebration

Published

on

The Washington Bladeā€™s Pride on the Pier will be extended to a two-day celebration in honor of WorldPride coming to D.C. this year. Taking place on Friday, June 6 and Saturday, June 7 at The Wharf, this yearā€™s event promises more entertainment, more community, and more pride than ever before ā€” all set against the stunning waterfront backdrop of our nationā€™s capital.

With the addition of Friday, the party kicks off at 3 p.m., with the inaugural WorldPride Boat Parade at 7 p.m. As an Official WorldPride Partner event, the boat parade will feature 30 decorated boats parading along the Washington Channel. For information on signing up for the boat parade contact Stephen Rutgers at [email protected].

Saturdayā€™s signature Pier Party kicks off at 12 p.m., featuring a drag show, DJ’s, streaming of the WorldPride Parade, and the iconic Fireworks Show Presented by the Leonard-Litz Foundation ā€” one of D.C. Prideā€™s most anticipated spectacles.

ā€œWeā€™re expanding Washington Blade Pride on the Pier to reflect the excitement and momentum building for WorldPride in D.C.,ā€ said Blade publisher Lynne Brown. ā€œItā€™s a celebration of our communityā€™s progress and a powerful reminder of the joy and visibility Pride brings to the heart of our city.ā€

Now in its seventh year, Washington Blade Pride on the Pier extends the cityā€™s annual celebration of LGBTQ visibility to the bustling Wharf waterfront with an exciting array of activities and entertainment for all ages. The District Pier will offer DJs, dancing, drag, and other entertainment. Alcoholic beverages will be available for purchase for those 21 and older.

Pride on the Pier is free and open to the public, with VIP tickets available for exclusive pier access, hosted bars, and private viewing areas for the boat parade and the fireworks show. To purchase VIP tickets visit www.prideonthepierdc.com/vip

Friday VIP: 5-9 p.m., enjoy an air-conditioned lounge, private bathroom, cash bar and complimentary drink.

Saturday VIP Session #1: 2-5 p.m., enjoy an air-conditioned lounge, private bathroom, catered food, and an open bar.

Saturday VIP Session #2: 6-9 p.m., enjoy the air-conditioned lounge, private bathroom, catered snacks and dinner, and open bar with a front-row view of the fireworks.

Event Details:

šŸ“ Location: District Pier at The Wharf (101 District Sq., S.W., Washington, D.C.)
šŸ“… Dates: Friday, June 6 & Saturday, June 7, 2025
šŸ›„ļøBoat Parade: 7 p.m. (June 6). šŸŽ† Fireworks Show: 9 p.m. (June 7)
šŸŽŸļø VIP Tickets: www.PrideOnThePierDC.com/VIP

Event sponsors include Absolut, Capital Pride, DC Fray, Infinate Legacy, Heineken, Leonard-Litz Foundation, Mayorā€™s Office of LGBTQ Affairs, Relish Catering,Ā  Washingtonian, and The Wharf. More information regarding activities will be released at www.PrideOnThePierDC.com

Continue Reading

Maryland

Md. schools plan to comply with federal DEI demands

Superintendents opt for cooperation over confrontation

Published

on

(Bigstock photo)

By LIZ BOWIE | Deciding not to pick a fight with the Trump administration, Maryland school leaders plan to sign a letter to the U.S. Department of Education that says their school districts are complying with all civil rights laws.

The two-paragraph letter could deflect a confrontation over whether the stateā€™s public schools run diversity, equity, and inclusion programs that the Trump administration has called illegal. The Baltimore Banner reviewed the letter, which was shared by a school administrator who declined to be identified because the letter has not yet been sent.

Maryland school leaders are taking a more conciliatory approach than those in some other states. Education leaders in Minnesota, New YorkColoradoOregon, Vermont, and Wisconsin said they will not comply with the federal education departmentā€™s order, the demands of which, they say, are based on a warped interpretation of civil rights law.

The rest of this article can be found on the Baltimore Banner’s website.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular