Connect with us

News

White House mum on marriage going to Supreme Court

White House spokesperson unsure if Obama’s DOJ will take part in litigation

Published

on

Jay Carney, White House, gay news, Washington Blade
Jay Carney, White House, gay news, Washington Blade

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney has no comment on marriage coming to the Supreme Court (Washington Blade file photo by Damien Salas).

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney side-stepped a question Friday on whether President Obama is eager to see the U.S. Supreme Court take up the issue of marriage equality, reflecting instead on the growth on public support of same-sex marriage.

In response to a question from the Washington Blade, Carney refused to comment on the potential for a nationwide ruling from the Supreme Court on marriage equality in the wake of federal court decision against Virginia’s ban on same-sex marriage.

“Well, I’m not going to speak hypothetically about cases the Supreme Court may or may not take,” Carney said. “What I can tell you is the president supports, as he made clear, making available to LGBT Americans the rights that we all should enjoy, and his views on same-sex marriage were, I think, very powerfully expressed.”

Referencing Obama’s own evolution on his path to announcing his support for marriage equality, Carney said the president takes pride in the growing support for same-sex marriage in recent years.

“He feels very gratified by the enormous progress that’s been made on this issue, and the change in perspectives that I think we’ve seen ‘evolve’ across the country in rather a remarkable amount of time ā€” a remarkably short amount of time ā€” which is not to say that it shouldn’t have happened earlier, but that it is, given the way these kinds of struggles for equal rights play out, notable and commendable that Americans across the country have embraced this issue as strongly as the have,” Carney said.

Carney had no comment when asked whether he anticipates that the Obama administration would participate in any of the pending lawsuits seeking marriage equality as it did with litigation that overturned Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act and California’s Proposition 8.

“I wouldn’t be the right person to guess,” Carney said. “You might look for speculation at the Justice Department.”

The Justice Department didn’t immediately respond to the Washington Blade’s request to comment. The Obama administration participated in litigation against DOMA as a party to the lawsuit and in the case against Prop 8 as a friend of the court.

A number of LGBT advocates have weighed in on the possibility of the Obama administration participating in the marriage cases. Freedom to Marry President Evan Wolfson said the administration “should absolutely be part” of all the marriage cases, while legal duo Ted Olson and David Boies as well as Human Rights Campaign Chad Griffin said they’d welcome Obama’s participation.

A brief transcript of the exchange follows:

Washington Blade: A federal court yesterday ruled against Virginia’s ban on same-sex marriage. At least four circuit courts will be considering the issue this spring, which likely means the Supreme Court will be taking up the issue and making a decision next year. Is the president eager for the Supreme Court to make an nationwide decision on this over the course of his presidency?

Jay Carney: Well, I’m not going to speak hypothetically about cases the Supreme Court may or may not take. What I can tell you is the president supports, as he made clear, making available to LGBT Americans the rights that we all should enjoy, and his views on same-sex marriage were, I think, very powerfully expressed. And he feels very gratified by the enormous progress that’s been made on this issue, and the change in perspectives that I think we’ve seen “evolve” across the country in rather a remarkable amount of time ā€” a remarkably short amount of time ā€” which is not to say that it shouldn’t have happened earlier, but that it is, given the way these kinds of struggles for equal rights play out, notable and commendable that Americans across the country have embraced this issue as strongly as the have.

Blade: But do you anticipate the administration will participate in the cases as much as it did in the DOMA and the Prop 8 cases?

Carney: I wouldn’t be the right person to guess. You might look for speculation at the Justice Department.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

District of Columbia

LGBTQ budget advocates fight for D.C. resources in a tough fiscal year

‘Trying to preserve life-saving services’ amid $1 billion cut

Published

on

Heidi Ellis, coordinator of the DC LGBT Budget Coalition. (Photo courtesy of Heidi Ellis)

The months and days leading up to June are especially busy for LGBTQ Washingtonians. For one group, the DC LGBT Budget Coalition, which works year-round to ensure LGBTQ residents are represented and financially supported by the D.C. government, this time of year is their Super Bowl. Beginning in April, the D.C. Council and Mayorā€™s Office hold budget hearings for the next fiscal year.

With D.C.’s budget now under review, the Washington Blade spoke with Heidi Ellis, coordinator of the DC LGBT Budget Coalition, about the groupā€™s top priorities and their push to ensure continued support for queer communities.

ā€œThe LGBTQ Budget Coalition was founded in 2020 at the height of the pandemic, as a way for the community to work together to advocate for key funding and policy changes,ā€ Ellis said. ā€œWe recognized we were stronger together. A lot of groups are often pitted against each other for resources and dollars. This coalition was founded out of a need for unity. Since then, weā€™ve successfully advocated for more than $20 million in dedicated LGBTQ investments.ā€

In addition to coordinating the coalition, Ellis is the founder and CEO of HME Consulting & Advocacy, a firm that helps build coalitions and advance policy initiatives that address intersectional issues in the LGBTQ community. One of its most powerful tools, she explained, is direct outreach through community surveys.

ā€œWe actually do community surveys to see what people need and whatā€™s top of mind,ā€ Ellis said. ā€œOf course, we also pay attention to the broader political landscape ā€” like the current threats to HIV funding. That helps us prioritize.ā€

Because the coalition is comprised of more than 20 organizations across various sectors ā€”healthcare, housing, community organizing ā€” Ellis said its diversity enables it to connect grassroots needs to potential policy solutions.

ā€œOur coalition includes service providers, community groups, health and housing advocates-folks who are deeply plugged into whatā€™s happening on the ground,ā€ she said. ā€œThey help determine our direction. We know we donā€™t represent every queer person in D.C., but our coalition reflects a wide range of identities and experiences.ā€

The insights gathered through those surveys ultimately inform the coalitionā€™s annual budget proposal, which is submitted to the Council and mayor.

ā€œThatā€™s how we got to our FY26 priorities,ā€ she said. ā€œThis year, more than ever, weā€™re fighting to protect what weā€™ve already secured ā€” funding and policies weā€™ve had to fight for in the past. We know thereā€™s concern around this budget.ā€

One of the challenges this year is that the D.C. governmentā€™s operating budget and some of its legislation must be approved by Congress. With a projected decline in tax revenue and a Republican-controlled Congress that has historically opposed LGBTQ funding, the Coalition has had to think strategically.

ā€œEven before the situation on the Hill, the CFO projected lower revenue,ā€ Ellis said. ā€œThat meant cuts to social programs were already coming. And now, with the $1 billion slashed from D.C.ā€™s budget due to the continuing resolution, weā€™re not only fighting for D.C.ā€™s budget and autonomy, but also trying to preserve life-saving services. Our message is simple: Donā€™t forget about queer people.ā€

This yearā€™s proposal doesnā€™t include specific dollar figures. Instead, the Coalition outlines five funding priority areas: Healthcare, Employment & Economic Equity, Housing, Safety & Community Support, and Civil Rights.

Why no exact amounts? Ellis said itā€™s because not all solutions are financial.

ā€œSome of our asks donā€™t require new funding. Others build on existing programs-weā€™re asking whether the current use of funds is the most effective. Weā€™re also proposing policy changes that wouldnā€™t cost extra but could make a real difference. Itā€™s about using what we have better,ā€ she said.

When drafting the proposal, the Coalition tries to prioritize those with the most pressing and intersecting needs.

ā€œOur perspective is: If we advocate for the most vulnerable, others benefit too,ā€ Ellis said. ā€œTake LGBTQ seniors. Some may have done well in life but now face housing insecurity or struggle to access affordable healthcare. Many in our coalition are elders who fought on the frontlines during the AIDS epidemic. They bring critical historical context and remind us that Black and brown communities bore the brunt of that crisis.ā€

ā€œI love our coalition because it keeps us accountable to the moment,ā€ she added. ā€œIf we center those most marginalized, we can make an impact that lifts everyone.ā€

In addition to healthcare and housing, safety remains a top concern. The Coalition has fought to maintain funding for the Violence Prevention and Response Team (VPART), a city-supported group that includes MPD, community-based organizations, and the Mayorā€™s Office of LGBTQ Affairs. VPART responds to crimes affecting the LGBTQ community and connects victims to legal, healthcare, and housing services.

ā€œWeā€™ve pushed to make VPART more proactive, not just reactive,ā€ Ellis said. ā€œThe funding weā€™ve secured has helped survivors get the support they need. Cutting that funding now would undo progress weā€™re just beginning to see.ā€

At the end of the day, Ellis emphasized that this process is about far more than spreadsheets.

ā€œA budget is a moral document,ā€ she said. ā€œIf weā€™re not represented, youā€™re telling us our lives donā€™t matter at a time when we need protection the most. When people canā€™t get food, medicine, housing ā€” that has a devastating impact. These are vital services.ā€

The DC LGBT Budget Coalition is urging residents to support a letter-writing campaign to D.C. Council members and the mayor. You can send a letter here: https://actionnetwork.org/letters/fully-fund-dcs-lgbtq-communities

Read the full FY26 budget proposal here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bTrENnc4ZazJTO6LPrQ3lZkF02QNIIf1/view

Continue Reading

Arts & Entertainment

Washington Bladeā€™s Pride on the Pier returns bigger than everĀ with two-day WorldPride celebration

Published

on

The Washington Bladeā€™s Pride on the Pier will be extended to a two-day celebration in honor of WorldPride coming to D.C. this year. Taking place on Friday, June 6 and Saturday, June 7 at The Wharf, this yearā€™s event promises more entertainment, more community, and more pride than ever before ā€” all set against the stunning waterfront backdrop of our nationā€™s capital.

With the addition of Friday, the party kicks off at 3 p.m., with the inaugural WorldPride Boat Parade at 7 p.m. As an Official WorldPride Partner event, the boat parade will feature 30 decorated boats parading along the Washington Channel. For information on signing up for the boat parade contact Stephen Rutgers at [email protected].

Saturdayā€™s signature Pier Party kicks off at 12 p.m., featuring a drag show, DJ’s, streaming of the WorldPride Parade, and the iconic Fireworks Show Presented by the Leonard-Litz Foundation ā€” one of D.C. Prideā€™s most anticipated spectacles.

ā€œWeā€™re expanding Washington Blade Pride on the Pier to reflect the excitement and momentum building for WorldPride in D.C.,ā€ said Blade publisher Lynne Brown. ā€œItā€™s a celebration of our communityā€™s progress and a powerful reminder of the joy and visibility Pride brings to the heart of our city.ā€

Now in its seventh year, Washington Blade Pride on the Pier extends the cityā€™s annual celebration of LGBTQ visibility to the bustling Wharf waterfront with an exciting array of activities and entertainment for all ages. The District Pier will offer DJs, dancing, drag, and other entertainment. Alcoholic beverages will be available for purchase for those 21 and older.

Pride on the Pier is free and open to the public, with VIP tickets available for exclusive pier access, hosted bars, and private viewing areas for the boat parade and the fireworks show. To purchase VIP tickets visit www.prideonthepierdc.com/vip

Friday VIP: 5-9 p.m., enjoy an air-conditioned lounge, private bathroom, cash bar and complimentary drink.

Saturday VIP Session #1: 2-5 p.m., enjoy an air-conditioned lounge, private bathroom, catered food, and an open bar.

Saturday VIP Session #2: 6-9 p.m., enjoy the air-conditioned lounge, private bathroom, catered snacks and dinner, and open bar with a front-row view of the fireworks.

Event Details:

šŸ“ Location: District Pier at The Wharf (101 District Sq., S.W., Washington, D.C.)
šŸ“… Dates: Friday, June 6 & Saturday, June 7, 2025
šŸ›„ļøBoat Parade: 7 p.m. (June 6). šŸŽ† Fireworks Show: 9 p.m. (June 7)
šŸŽŸļø VIP Tickets: www.PrideOnThePierDC.com/VIP

Event sponsors include Absolut, Capital Pride, DC Fray, Infinate Legacy, Heineken, Leonard-Litz Foundation, Mayorā€™s Office of LGBTQ Affairs, Relish Catering,Ā  Washingtonian, and The Wharf. More information regarding activities will be released at www.PrideOnThePierDC.com

Continue Reading

Maryland

Md. schools plan to comply with federal DEI demands

Superintendents opt for cooperation over confrontation

Published

on

(Bigstock photo)

By LIZ BOWIE | Deciding not to pick a fight with the Trump administration, Maryland school leaders plan to sign a letter to the U.S. Department of Education that says their school districts are complying with all civil rights laws.

The two-paragraph letter could deflect a confrontation over whether the stateā€™s public schools run diversity, equity, and inclusion programs that the Trump administration has called illegal. The Baltimore Banner reviewed the letter, which was shared by a school administrator who declined to be identified because the letter has not yet been sent.

Maryland school leaders are taking a more conciliatory approach than those in some other states. Education leaders in Minnesota, New YorkColoradoOregon, Vermont, and Wisconsin said they will not comply with the federal education departmentā€™s order, the demands of which, they say, are based on a warped interpretation of civil rights law.

The rest of this article can be found on the Baltimore Banner’s website.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular