Opinions
On gay acceptance, young people suck. So do Republicans.
New survey reveals declining support for LGBT rights

OK, stay with me. Years ago, well, not that many years ago, for us gay people pretty much all Republicans hated us. All Republicans and every other Democrat. But now times have changed. As evidenced last month with all the wonderful Pride brouhaha, Democrats were practically tripping over themselves to march in our parades. Republicans, naturally, couldn’t be bothered. Whatever, right? I mean, can you imagine what sort of joy Mitch McConnell would bring to Pride anyway?
Democrats have largely come around, Republicans, not so much. And generally, acceptance is on the rise. Generally. All across the board society’s attitudes and perceptions of LGBT Americans have pretty much improved. That is, except for one demographic — young people. For those 18-34 years of age, the numbers have slid for a second year in a row. In its yearly national survey among U.S. adults conducted by GLAAD, the survey asked how comfortable are you interacting with an LGBT person. For young people in the 2018 survey, this stood at 45%. That’s down from 53% in 2017 and a high of 63% in 2016. And this from young people, typically seen as the cooler of the generations. Even older Americans, those placed in the ‘curmudgeon’ and ‘back in my day. . .’ categories. That age group, those 72 and older, even edge out young people on the acceptance scale, albeit by just a hair.
So not great news coming out of the survey. And I don’t want to get too numbers heavy in these columns. But let me just offer up one more statistic. Hate crimes are on the rise in our city, and not surprisingly, LGBT Washingtonians are the biggest target. The Washington Post reported earlier this year that the District racked up 61 crimes in 2018 based on sexual orientation, up from 40 in 2016 and 56 the year before that. Numbers-wise, that’s an increase of more than 50 percent in just over two years. GLAAD categorized the decrease in acceptance among younger Americans as ‘alarming.’ Let’s couple this with the rise in hate crimes against LGBT people and you could categorize it all as “Oh my God!”
So where is all this ‘un-acceptance’ and downright hate coming from? There is a lot of it out there to be sure, and social media bares a lot of the blame. The truth is, no matter how you feel about us gays, it would only take a few clicks around to find a whole host of others that agree with you. A few more clicks to find some really hateful rhetoric, I’m sure. I’ve never gone poking around, but I do hate-follow a couple of politicians from back home in Arkansas, and one even tweeted about the survey noted above as a good development. Yeah, needless to say, he’s a Republican.
And maybe it’s a good idea to be reminded from time to time that there are large swaths of America that don’t generally care for us. A large swath that would rather not have us around. And those folks are generally more on the Republican side of things. GLAAD minces no words in laying blame pretty much entirely on President Donald Trump. To all the people out there who thought on LGBT issues Trump couldn’t be that bad, GLAAD has tallied up over 100 instances of explicit anti-gay bias by Trump himself, his appointees, or departments. Talk about death by a thousand cuts. And let’s be clear, the two years seeing decreased acceptance among the young match up exactly with the 2016 election of Trump. And social media is certainly his favorite platform from which to spew hate.
And this column has touched on it all before. I call it ‘trickle down hate’ coming from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. That the man sets the tone and tenor for all those impressionable young MAGA-hat wearing youths you dodge while running on the National Mall.
I’m ready for a change. And if Republicans and the president they embolden inspire others to act with bigotry and hate, then 2020 cannot come soon enough.
Brock Thompson is a D.C.-based writer. He contributes regularly to the Blade.
Letter-to-the-Editor
Candidates should pledge to nominate LGBTQ judge to Supreme Court
Presidential, Senate hopefuls need to go on the record
As soon as the final votes are cast and counted and verified after the November 2026 elections are over, the 2028 presidential cycle will begin in earnest. Polls, financial aid requests, and volunteer opportunities ad infinitum will flood the public and personal media. There will be more issues than candidates in both parties. The rending of garments and mudslinging will be both interesting and maybe even amusing as citizens will watch how candidates react to each and every issue of the day.
There is one particular item that I am hoping each candidate will be asked whether in private or in public. If a Supreme Court vacancy occurs in your potential administration, will you nominate an open and qualified LGBTQ to join the remaining eight?
Other interest groups on both sides have made similar demands over the years and have had them honored. Is it not time that our voices are raised as well? There are several already sitting judges on both state and federal benches that have either been elected statewide or approved by the U.S. Senate.
Our communities are being utilized and abused on judicial menus. Enough already! Challenge each and every candidate, regardless of their party with our honest question and see if honest answers are given. By the way … no harm in asking the one-third of the U.S. Senate candidates too who will be on ballots. Looking forward to any candidate tap dancing!
Opinions
2026 elections will bring major changes to D.C. government
Mayor’s office, multiple Council seats up for grabs
Next year will be a banner year for elections in D.C. The mayor announced she will not run. Two Council members, Anita Bonds, At-large, and Brianne Nadeau, Ward 1, have announced they will not run. Waiting for Del. Norton to do the same, but even if she doesn’t, there will be a real race for that office.
So far, Robert White, Council member at-large, and Brooke Pinto, Council member Ward 2, are among a host of others, who have announced. If one of these Council members should win, there would be a special election for their seat. If Kenyon McDuffie, Council member at-large, announces for mayor as a Democrat, which he is expected to do, he will have to resign his seat on the Council as he fills one of the non-Democratic seats there. Janeese George, Ward 4 Council member, announced she is running for mayor. Should she win, there would be a special election for her seat. Another special election could happen if Trayon White, Ward 8, is convicted of his alleged crimes, when he is brought to trial in January. Both the Council chair, and attorney general, have announced they are seeking reelection, along with a host of other offices that will be on the ballot.
Many of the races could look like the one in Ward 1 where at least six people have already announced. They include three members of the LGBTQ community. It seems the current leader in that race is Jackie Reyes Yanes, a Latina activist, not a member of the LGBTQ community, who worked for Mayor Fenty as head of the Latino Affairs Office, and for Mayor Bowser as head of the Office of Community Affairs. About eight, including the two Council members, have already announced they are running for the delegate seat.
I am often asked by candidates for an endorsement. The reason being my years as a community, LGBTQ, and Democratic, activist; and my ability to endorse in my column in the Washington Blade. The only candidate I endorsed so far is Phil Mendelson, for Council chair. While he and I don’t always agree on everything, he’s a staunch supporter of the LGBTQ community, a rational person, and we need someone with a steady hand if there really are six new Council members, out of the 13.
When candidates call, they realize I am a policy wonk. My unsolicited advice to all candidates is: Do more than talk in generalities, be specific and honest as to what you think you can do, if elected. Candidates running for a legislative office, should talk about what bills they will support, and then what new ones they will introduce. What are the first three things you will focus on for your constituents, if elected. If you are running against an incumbent, what do you think you can do differently than the person you hope to replace? For any new policies and programs you propose, if there is a cost, let constituents know how you intend to pay for them. Take the time to learn the city budget, and how money is currently being spent. The more information you have at your fingertips, the smarter you sound, and voters respect that, at least many do. If you are running for mayor, you need to develop a full platform, covering all the issues the city will face, something I have helped a number of previous mayors do. The next mayor will continue to have to deal with the felon in the White House. He/she/they will have to ensure he doesn’t try to eliminate home rule. The next mayor will have to understand how to walk a similar tightrope Mayor Bowser has balanced so effectively.
Currently, the District provides lots of public money to candidates. If you decide to take it, know the details. The city makes it too easy to get. But while it is available, take advantage of it. One new variable in this election is the implementation of rank-choice voting. It will impact how you campaign. If you attack another candidate, you may not be the second, or even third, choice, of their strongest supporters.
Each candidate needs a website. Aside from asking for donations and volunteers, it should have a robust issues section, biography, endorsements, and news. One example I share with candidates is my friend Zach Wahls’s website. He is running for United States Senate from Iowa. It is a comprehensive site, easy to navigate, with concise language, and great pictures. One thing to remember is that D.C. is overwhelmingly Democratic. Chances are the winner of the Democratic primary will win the general election.
Potential candidates should read the DCBOE calendar. Petitions will be available at the Board of Elections on Jan. 23, with the primary on June 16th, and general election on Nov. 3. So, ready, set, go!
Peter Rosenstein is a longtime LGBTQ rights and Democratic Party activist.
Opinions
Lighting candles in a time of exhaustion
Gunmen killed 15 people at Sydney Hanukkah celebration
In the wake of the shooting at Bondi Beach that targeted Jews, many of us are sitting with a familiar feeling: exhaustion. Not shock or surprise, but the deep weariness that comes from knowing this violence continues. It is yet another reminder that antisemitism remains persistent.
Bondi Beach is far from Washington, D.C., but antisemitism does not respect geography. When Jews are attacked anywhere, Jews everywhere feel it. We check on family and friends, absorb the headlines, and brace ourselves for the quiet, numbing normalization that has followed acts of mass violence.
Many of us live at an intersection where threats can come from multiple directions. As a community, we have embraced the concept of intersectional identity, and yet in queer spaces, many LGBTQ+ Jews are being implicitly or explicitly asked to play down our Jewishness. Jews hesitate before wearing a Magen David or a kippah. Some of us have learned to compartmentalize our identities, deciding which part of ourselves feels safest to lead with. Are we welcome as queer people only if we mute our Jewishness? Are those around us able to acknowledge that our fear is not abstract, but rooted in a lived reality, one in which our friends and family are directly affected by the rise in antisemitic violence, globally and here at home?
As a result of these experiences, many LGBTQ+ Jews feel a growing fatigue. We are told, implicitly or explicitly, that our fear is inconvenient; that Jewish trauma must be contextualized, minimized, or deferred in favor of other injustices. Certainly, the world is full of horror. And yet, we long for a world in which all lives are cherished and safe, where solidarity is not conditional on political purity or on which parts of ourselves are deemed acceptable to love.
We are now in the season of Chanuka. The story of this holiday is not one of darkness vanishing overnight. It is the story of a fragile light that should not have lasted. Chanuka teaches us that hope does not require certainty; it requires persistence and the courage to kindle a flame even when the darkness feels overwhelming.
For LGBTQ+ Jews, this lesson resonates deeply. We have survived by refusing to disappear across multiple dimensions of our identities. We have built communities, created rituals, and embraced chosen families that affirm the fullness of who we are.
To our LGBTQ+ siblings who are not Jewish: this is a moment to listen, to stand with us, and to make space for our grief. Solidarity means showing up not only when it is easy or popular, but especially when it is uncomfortable.
To our fellow Jews: your exhaustion is valid. Your fear is understandable, and so is your hope. Every candle lit this Chanuka is an act of resilience. Every refusal to hide, every moment of joy, is a declaration that hatred will not have the final word.
Light does not deny darkness. It confronts it.
As we light our candles this Chanuka season, may we protect one another and bring light to one another, even as the world too often responds to difference with violence and hate.
Joshua Maxey is the executive director of Bet Mishpachah, D.C.’s LGBTQ synagogue.
