National
LGBTQ elder care facilities open nationwide, but discrimination persists
Advocates say seniors face challenges despite groundbreaking advances
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e773d/e773d405d2935bf6355fc643efc6d1012133c3dc" alt=""
Marsha Wetzel, an out lesbian, shared her life with her partner of 30 years, Judith Kahn, at the coupleās home in Illinois until Kahn died in 2013 of colon cancer.
As is the case with some same-sex couples who never married, Kahnās family took legal possession of the coupleās home several years later, forcing Wetzel, who suffered from severe arthritis, to move into the Glen St. Andrew Living Community, a retirement and assisted living facility in Niles, Ill.
According to a lawsuit filed on her behalf in 2016 by the LGBTQ litigation group Lambda Legal, when word got out that Wetzel was a lesbian after she disclosed her sexual orientation to a fellow resident, she was called homophobic slurs, spat on, and assaulted on several occasions by other residents of the facility. The lawsuit, which later resulted in a court ruling in Wetzelās favor, charged that officials at the Glen St. Andrew facility illegally failed to take action to prevent Wetzel from being subjected to abuse and threats by fellow residents and retaliated against her when she complained.
Lambda Legal announced one year ago, on Nov. 20, 2020, that Wetzel passed away at the age of 73 of natural causes after a landmark 2018 appeals court ruling in her favor affirmed that residential facilities such as the one in which she lived are legally responsible for the safety of tenant residents.
āMarsha spent the rest of her days in a senior living community where she was out and affirmed,ā said Lambda Legal attorney Karen Loewy, who represented Wetzel in the lawsuit.
Advocates for LGBTQ seniors were hopeful that the 2018 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruling in the Wetzel case would speed up the gradual but steady advances in the rights of LGBTQ elders in long-term care facilities and in society in general.
A short time later, the New York City-based national LGBTQ elder advocacy group SAGE expanded its programs providing cultural competency training for the nationās long-term care residential facilities. And in some cities, including New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco, LGBTQ specific retirement and long-term care facilities began to open to provide LGBTQ elders with a wide range of āwrap aroundā services in addition to a safe place to live.
But LGBTQ elder advocates were taken aback in October of this year when news surfaced that transgender U.S. Army veteran Lisa Oakley, 68, was denied placement in more than two-dozen long-term care facilities in Colorado in 2020 and earlier this year.
āWhen they found out I was transgender, a lot of the facilities didnāt want me,ā Oakley told USA Today. āA lot of transgender people, Iām sure, face the same thing,ā she said. āWeāre humans, just like everybody else.ā
Oakley told other media outlets her ordeal in trying to gain admission to a residential care facility began in October 2020, when she became unable to care for herself due to complications from diabetes. Her first choice was a facility in her hometown in rural Craig, Colo., where she had lived for the previous 25 years. She believes that facility turned her down because of her gender identity.
A social worker who assisted in Oakleyās applications for long-term care facilities said the facility in Craig said Oakley would have to be placed in a private room, which was at the time unavailable, ābecause she still has her āboy partsā and cannot be placed with a womanā in a shared room.
Many other Colorado facilities to which Oakley applied for admission, according to social worker Cori Martin-Crawford, cited the COVID pandemic as the reason for not accepting new residents. But as COVID related restrictions began to subside, other facilities continued to deny Oakley admission.
With Martin-Crawfordās help, Oakley finally found a facility that is LGBTQ supportive in Grand Junction, Colo., which is nearly three hours away from her hometown of Craig, where she had hoped to remain.
LGBTQ activists expressed concern that the discrimination that Oakley faced took place in the state of Colorado, which has a state law that bans discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Experts familiar with long-term care facilities for older adults have said many private elder care facilities can get around state LGBTQ nondiscrimination laws by claiming other reasons for turning down an LGBTQ person.
Michael Adams, the CEO of SAGE, told the Blade that the wide range of programs and initiatives put in place by SAGE and other groups advocating for LGBTQ elders in recent years have resulted in significant changes in support of LGBTQ seniors.
āIt is the case now that in almost all states there are one or more elder care facilities that have been trained through our SAGECare program,ā Adams said. āBut itās nowhere near what it needs to be,ā he said. āIt needs to be that there are welcoming elder care facilities in every single community in this countryā for LGBTQ elders.
Adams was referring to the SAGE program started recently called SAGECare that arranges for employees and other officials at elder care facilities throughout the country to receive LGBTQ competency training. The facilities that participate in the program are designated “SAGECare credentialed,ā and are included in SAGE database lists available to LGBTQ elders looking for a safe facility in which to reside.
SAGE spokesperson Christina Da Costa provided the Blade with data showing there have been 136,975 professionals trained at a total of 617 SAGECare credentialed organizations nationwide. Out of 617 organizations, 172 are residential communities. Also, out of the total of 617 are 167 Area Agencies on Aging, Aging and Disability Resource Centers, Senior Centers, and senior Ombudsman offices.
Da Costa said 278 of the credentialed entities that have received the SAGECare training throughout the country are āother aging focused nonprofit and for-profit businesses.ā
According to SAGE, there are 12 SAGECare credentialed elder care facilities or service providers operating in the D.C. metropolitan area, with two located in D.C. One of the D.C. facilities is Ingleside at Rock Creek, located in Northwest D.C., which is a residential facility. The other is Options for Senior America, a company that provides in-home care services for seniors, including seniors living in D.C.
A SAGE list of the D.C.-area SAGECare credentialed facilities shows that three are in Rockville, Md.; two are in Gaithersburg, Md.; and one each are in Bethesda, Md.; Arlington, Va.; and Alexandria, Va. The list shows that one of them that provides services to elders in the D.C. area is based in North Carolina.
SAGE has a separate list of the 15 elder care residential facilities in the U.S. created specifically to serve LGBTQ residents.
None are in D.C., Maryland, or Virginia. However, SAGE says it has been working in cooperation with Maryās House for Older Adults, a D.C.-based LGBTQ organization that advocates for LGBTQ seniors and is in the process of opening LGBTQ elder residential facilities in D.C. and others in the surrounding suburbs.
Maryās House founder and CEO Dr. Imani Woody couldnāt immediately be reached to determine when the organization expects to open its first residential facility.
While a residential LGBTQ elder facility has yet to open in the D.C. area, activists note that in addition to Maryās House, services and amenities for LGBTQ elders in the area are currently being provided by the D.C. Center for the LGBT Community and Whitman-Walker Health, the LGBTQ supportive health center, which also has a legal services branch.
Adams of SAGE said the Los Angeles LGBTQ Center opened the nationās first LGBTQ elder residential facility over eight years ago called Triangle Square. He said the L.A. Center opened a second LGBTQ elder residential facility a short time later. And this week, the L.A. Center announced it has opened a third LGBTQ elder residential facility in Hollywood that is part of a larger āintergenerational campusā that will bring together LGBTQ seniors and LGBTQ youth.
SAGE, meanwhile, operates two LGBTQ elder long-term care residential facilities in New York City, one in Brooklyn called the Stonewall House and one in the Bronx called Pride House.
The other U.S. cities with LGBTQ elder residential facilities include: Philadelphia, Minneapolis, Chicago, Cleveland, San Francisco (which has two such facilities), San Diego, Houston, Fort Lauderdale, and Islip, N.Y.
Adams said the LGBTQ elder residential facilities range in size, with the largest ā New Yorkās Stonewall House ā having 143 apartments that can accommodate 200 residents. He said others vary from 40 or 50 residential units to 120.
Advocates for LGBTQ elders point to what they consider another important breakthrough for LGBTQ elders this year in the release of a joint SAGE-Human Rights Campaign Long-Term Care Equality Index report for 2021. Adams said the report is the first of what could become an annual report and rating and scorecard for long-term care elder residential facilities and other elder facilities.
The 2021 report includes a self-reporting assessment of elder care facilities that the facilities themselves completed through a questionnaire in which many disclosed they have LGBTQ nondiscrimination policies for elders around admission to the facility and for practices by staff for those residing in their facilities.
The report includes a chart showing that 158 elder care facilities in 31 states responded positively to the outreach to them by organizers of the Long-Term Care Equality Index.
āWe are thrilled to be working with SAGE and to be working with the Human Rights Campaign who are developing the Long-Term Care Equality Index,ā said Nii-Quartelai Quartey, who serves as senior adviser and LGBTQ liaison for the American Association of Retired Persons or AARP.
āThere is a great deal of work that weāre doing in the area of LGBTQ older adults nationwide,ā Quartey told the Blade. āAnd AARP has been engaged with the LGBTQ community nationwide for many years now,ā he said.
āIn recent years, weāve turned up the volume in working more closely with organizations like SAGE and Lambda Legal and the Victory Fund Institute, the Center for Black Equity, the National Queer Asian Pacific Islander Alliance, and the Hispanic Federation.ā
According to Quartey, a recent AARP study of LGBTQ elders called Maintaining Dignity shows that longstanding concerns of discrimination remain despite the many advances in support for LGBTQ seniors in recent years.
He said a survey that was part of the study found that 67 percent of the LGBTQ elders who responded, āwere concerned about neglect in a long-term care setting.ā Over 60 percent feared verbal or physical harassment in a long-term care setting and over half āfelt forced to hide or deny their identityā as an LGBTQ person, Quartey said.
Another recent survey of LGBTQ elders conducted by SAGE asking them how they feel about the use of the word āqueerā in descriptions of LGBTQ people yielded findings that came as a surprise to some, according to Adams. A large majority of those surveyed from across the country said they are ācomfortable at this point using that word and reclaiming that word, which is different from what we had heard historically,ā Adams said.
He said in response to those findings SAGE will now as an organization gradually shift to using the term LGBTQ instead of its past practice of using LGBT.
Although Congress has yet to pass the Equality Act, last year under the Trump Administration, Congress acted in a rare bipartisan way to approve the required five-year reauthorization of the U.S. Older Americans Act with new language supportive of LGBTQ older adults. President Trump signed the legislation.
The language includes a mandate for outreach to and reporting about services provided to LGBTQ older adults in federally funded programs. It also opens the way for LGBTQ older adults to be designated in a category of āgreatest social need.ā Under that category, older adults receive a higher priority in the allocation of resources by the federal government.
āWeāve come a long way, but we still have a way to go to get over the finish line,ā said the AARPās Quartey. āAnd aside from passing legislation federally and on the state and local level, we absolutely need to continue the hard work of changing hearts and minds,ā he said.
Longtime gay activist and writer Brian McNaught, whose latest book, āOn Being Gay and Gray ā Our Stories, Gifts, and the Meaning of Our Lives,ā was just released, says his own very informal survey of LGBTQ elders found there is a need for intimacy that may be too controversial for the establishment LGBTQ elder groups.
āIām a SAGE volunteer and the 81-year-old man with whom I was working after his husband of 47 years died, said after his grieving process, āI want to be hugged and kissed. Does that make me a bad person?āā
McNaught told the Blade he assured the man those feelings do not make him a bad person. McNaught said the manās comment prompted him to conduct further research, in which he found that some gay male elders in the Fort Lauderdale, Fla., area who often need assisted living support would like to patronize gay bathhouses or seek the services of an escort agency. He said he determined that any LGBTQ elder group providing such services would trigger āa huge uproar of protestsā and most likely a loss of funding.
āWe donāt want to talk about sexuality and aging,ā McNaught said.
U.S. Military/Pentagon
Pentagon will identify transgender service members and begin discharging them
Policy goes further than the anti-trans military ban in first Trump term
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e164/0e164aac482878101f7dad0c67dd9267bc08075b" alt=""
The Pentagon on Thursday said that within 30 days it will draft and submit a procedure to identify service members who are transgender and begin discharging them from the military within 30 days of that date.
In his second administration, President Donald Trump has ordered an anti-trans military ban that goes further than the policy introduced during his first term, which only prohibited the military from accepting trans enlistees.
LGBTQ groups and other parties that filed lawsuits managed to significantly delay enforcement of the order for years, and likewise they are challenging the 2025 iteration in multiple federal courts.
On Thursday, New York State Attorney General Letitia James and a coalition of 20 attorneys general filed a brief to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington supporting the plaintiffs in one of those cases.
The White House directed the Pentagon to submit a formal policy detailing how the ban would be enforced via Trump’s Jan. 27 executive order, “Prioritizing Military Readiness and Excellence,”āwhich, like Thursday’s memo, denigrated trans soldiers and dismissed the sacrifice of their service.
Also per Trump’s directive, earlier this month the military announced it would discontinue providing gender affirming medical care and stop welcoming would-be enlistees who are trans.
Critics argue the administration’s policy doesn’t just fail to strengthen the military or fortify America’s defenses, as promised in the title of Trump’s directive, but it actually imperils those very objectives by separating qualified, proven soldiers at the expense of readiness and preparedness without a reasonable justification for their exclusion.
The Pentagon specified the exemptions would be reserved for only cases “provided there is a compelling government interest in retaining the service member that directly supports warfighting capabilities,” and even then only for service members who demonstrate “36 consecutive months of stability in [their] sex without clinically significant distress.”
Estimates of the number of trans service members range from the low thousands to as many as 15,000.
“The scope and severity of this ban is unprecedented. It is a complete purge of all transgender individuals from military service,” Shannon Minter of the National Center For Lesbian Rights told Reuters.
Other LGBTQ organizations shared statements condemning the memo on Thursday.
SPARTA:
Transgender Americans have served openly and honorably in the U.S. Armed Forces for nearly a decade. Thousands of transgender troops are currently serving, and are fully qualified for the positions in which they serve.
No policy will ever erase transgender Americans’ contribution to history, warfighting, or military excellence. Transgender service members have a unique fighting spirit and will continue to defend the constitution and American Values no matter what lies ahead.
In the meantime, SPARTA Pride continues to stand in solidarity with all transgender service members.
The Human Rights Campaign and Lambda Legal, in a joint statement:
The Human Rights Campaign Foundation and Lambda Legal today condemned the Department of Defense (DoD) guidance implementing the Trump administrationās policy banning transgender individuals from enlisting or continuing to serve in the United States Armed Forces that was issued Feb. 26. The policy institutes a 30-day period to begin separation of any current transgender servicemember currently in the military and has immediate impacts on access to healthcare and treatment of transgender servicemembers.
“A dishonorable action from a dishonorable administration. This attack on those who have dedicated themselves to serving our country is not only morally reprehensible but fundamentally un-American. Forcing out thousands of transgender servicemembersāwho have met every qualification to serveādoes not enhance military excellence or make our country safer. Instead, the United States will be losing highly trained professionals who serve in roles critical to our national security.Ā The courage and sacrifice demonstrated by transgender servicemembers in uniform-deserve our utmost respect and protection, not discrimination. This blatant injustice cannot stand, and we look forward to continuing to represent the brave transgender servicemembers in court.āĀ
Earlier this month, Lambda Legal and HRCF filed aĀ federal lawsuitĀ challenging the constitutionality of the Trump administrationās ban on military service by transgender people. The lawsuitābrought in response to the administrationās Jan. 27 executive orderāwas filed on behalf of six actively serving transgender service members, a transgender person seeking to enlist in the military, and Gender Justice League, a civil and human rights organization headquartered in Seattle.
On Feb. 19, Lambda Legal and HRCF asked the district court to block the trans military ban while the litigation proceeds.
Read more about the case here:Ā https://lambdalegal.org/case/shilling-v-trump/
U.S. Rep. Mark Takano (D-Calif.), chair of the Congressional Equality Caucus:
The contrast between Donald Trumpāwho cried ābone spursā to avoid military serviceāand the countless transgender Americans who serve their country with valor couldnāt be any clearer. Now, Trumpās Department of Defense has taken the latest steps to oust thousands of qualified, dedicated, and deployable servicemembers simply because he doesnāt like who they are. This is morally wrong, unconstitutional, and stupid.
President Trumpās discriminatory ban will needlessly create gaps in critical chains of command, endanger our national security, and flush millions of dollars spent on training these servicemembers down the drain. Every American who is willing and able to serve should be able to, regardless of how the President feels about their identity. As chair of the Equality Caucus, the largest coalition of members in the House of Representatives, I am committed to seeing this un-American ban undone and working to pass explicit, long-lasting protections for transgender people who sign up to serve their nation into law.
National
Trans rights rally to take place at US Capitol on Saturday
Participants expected to protest outside White House
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abb07/abb0782cf348129a691db417c59bc8887b067832" alt="U.S. Capitol"
Following the recent wave of legislation passed against transgender and gender diverse people across the country, the Trans Unity Coalition is holding a rally at the U.S. Capitol on Saturday.
The Trans Unity Coalition is a nonprofit advocacy organization established to support and empower the trans community across the country. Bree Taylor, the groupās founder and executive director, discussed the event, which will take place at 9:30 a.m. in front of the Capitol.
āThis is a day for the transgender community, our allies, and elected officials to come together and address the needs of our community,ā she said in a statement to the Washington Blade. āThe goal here is empowerment.ā
Trans activist and social influencer Kayden Coleman and researcher Chloe Schwenke are scheduled to speak on the current threats that the trans community, both in D.C. and around the country, face, as well as the needs of the community moving forward.
āWe aim to make this a day which, in addition to the direct ongoing needs of the trans community, also touches on intersectional needs and the importance of inclusivity,ā said Taylor.
The rally is set to begin with participants gathering at the Capitol before they march down Constitution Avenue. The event will end with a demonstration in front of the White House’s South Lawn.
The rally is expected to last about four hours. It is the 10th one the Trans Unity Coalition has held this year.
The group on Jan. 30 held similar rallies in Michigan, California, Texas, Massachusetts, Kentucky, Utah, Georgia, Ohio, and Colorado. Those rallies were held at each respective statesā capitals.
Michigan
Mich. lawmaker introduces resolution asking SCOTUS to overturn Obergefell
Far-right lawmaker stripped from committee assignments for extreme rhetoric
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/084c6/084c64587bd0cdd76b5358bb05b956a1b667243c" alt="marriage equality, Supreme Court, gay news, Washington Blade"
Republican Michigan state Rep. Josh Schriver introduced a resolution Tuesday asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges ruling, which established the nationwide right to same-sex marriage.
The lawmaker announced the move in a post on X, having previously shared a press release announcing plans to file the resolution, which argues that same-sex marriage is “at odds with the sanctity of marriage, the Michigan constitution, and principles upon which the country was established.”
The Resolution to Restore Marriage
— Rep. Josh Schriver (@JoshuaSchriver) February 25, 2025
ā Introduced pic.twitter.com/UrX1zSdmUf
Schriver’s resolution has 12 co-sponsors, and similar measures have been introduced in other states including Idaho, Iowa, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota.
Responding to one of his posts advocating for the overturning of Obergefell in December, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, a Democrat, said “any attempt to strip away gay marriage is wrong.”
Last month, the far-right politician was heard telling colleagues in leaked audio that gender affirming healthcare should be banned for minors as well as adults: “If we are going to stop this for anyone under 18, why not apply it for anyone over 18? It’s harmful across the board and that’s something we need to take into consideration in terms of the endgame.”
Earlier this month, he proposed banning birth control and reposted a message promoting the white nationalist Great Replacement conspiracy theory, the latter leading to Michigan House Minority Leader Matt Hall’s (R) decision to remove Schriver from his committee assignments.
-
District of Columbia5 days ago
HIV/AIDS activists arrested on Capitol Hill
-
District of Columbia1 day ago
Transgender Unity Rally draws hundreds
-
Music & Concerts4 days ago
Pride concert to take place at Strathmore after Kennedy Center rescinds invitation
-
U.S. Military/Pentagon4 days ago
Pentagon will identify transgender service members and begin discharging them