Connect with us

District of Columbia

Lawsuit charges D.C. Courts illegally fired trans man

Complaint says building technician subjected to abuse by supervisors

Published

on

Among the names appearing on the AG officeā€™s court briefs in the Carter lawsuit is D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine, a longtime supporter of LGBTQ rights. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

The D.C. Court of Appeals is currently deliberating over whether a 51-year-old transgender man who was fired in June 2019 from his job as a building maintenance technician at three buildings where the D.C. Superior Court and D.C. Court of Appeals are located has legal grounds to contest the firing, which he says was based on his gender identity.

In a little-noticed development, D.C. resident Dion Carter in June 2020 filed a lawsuit in D.C. Superior Court naming the D.C. government as the defendant in the case on procedural grounds, even though D.C. has no legal authority over the courts and was not responsible for more than eight years of discrimination and abusive treatment to which Carter was subjected on the job, according to Carterā€™s attorney, Stephen Pershing.

At the request of the Office of the D.C. Attorney General, which is representing the DC Court system in the lawsuit, a D.C. Superior Court judge on Jan. 29, 2021, dismissed the lawsuit, also on procedural grounds, without addressing any of Carterā€™s allegations of discrimination.

Superior Court Judge William M. Jackson stated in a three-page ruling that the D.C. Attorney Generalā€™s Office correctly stated in a motion seeking the dismissal of the case that Carterā€™s lawsuit failed to plead a viable cause of action on two grounds.

One of the grounds, the AGā€™s office stated, is that the D.C. Courtsā€™ Comprehensive Personnel Policy does not provide employees with a private right of action to seek monetary damages in a lawsuit related to discrimination.

The second ground that the D.C. AGā€™s office cited, and the judge upheld, is that Carterā€™s lawsuit was invalid because under court rules pertaining to the D.C. Courtsā€™ personnel system, an internal administrative complaint alleging employment discrimination must be filed and carried out to completion before a lawsuit could be filed in court.

In a brief in support of Carterā€™s lawsuit, Carterā€™s attorney, Stephen Pershing, strongly disputes the AG officeā€™s assertions, saying at least one Court of Appeals ruling indicated the D.C. Courtsā€™ personnel policies legally ā€œmirrorā€ the provisions of the D.C. Human Rights Act, which, among other things, prohibits discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation.  

Pershing also argued in his court briefs that Carter did file an internal administrative complaint to contest his firing. But he stated that a high-level D.C. Courtsā€™ official advised Carter that under the court systemā€™s personnel rules, a ruling in Carterā€™s favor could not result in monetary compensation for lost wages or other legal remedies that Carter called for in his complaint. The official advised Carter and Pershing to file the discrimination case in a lawsuit in court, the lawsuit says. This prompted Carter to withdraw his administrative complaint, a development that Pershing now says was based on misleading information provided by the D.C. Courtā€™s official.

In February 2021, Pershing appealed the dismissal of the case before the D.C. Court of Appeals, requesting that the dismissal be reversed and the case be sent back to D.C. Superior Court, where the specific merits of the case could be argued and presented before a jury.

Since the filing of the appeal, Pershing and attorneys with the Office of the D.C. Attorney General have filed briefs under consideration by the Court of Appeals supporting and opposing the contention that the D.C. Courtsā€™ personnel rules allow a remedy for Carterā€™s discrimination claims.

Like the original lawsuit filed in Superior Court, Carterā€™s appeal briefs filed by Pershing state that the alleged discrimination against Carter started shortly after Carter first began working in the court systemā€™s building maintenance department in January 2010 as an out lesbian prior to his transition as a male.

At that time Carter already had 15 years of experience in the field of building maintenance technology and became the first woman to hold such as position at the D.C. Courts, the lawsuit says.

According to the lawsuit, the abusive and discriminatory treatment toward Carter increased dramatically in 2015 when Carter informed his then-supervisor Emanuel Allen that he would be taking a short period of leave to undergo gender reassignment surgery. Upon his return to work after the first of five gender reassignment surgical procedures that he has now completed, Carter presented for the first time at work as a male, the lawsuit says.

ā€œFor the six months between Carterā€™s Family Medical Leave Act notice and his surgery, Mr. Allen cut Mr. Carter out of all overtime duty, overtime that was mandatory for all building maintenance workers and that they considered desirable,ā€ the lawsuit says. It says that when Carter asked why Allen did this Allen refused to provide an answer and threatened to issue a poor work performance evaluation against Carter if he continued to question the overtime denial decision.

When Carter returned from his surgery and presented as male, the lawsuit charges, Allen repeatedly referred to Carter as ā€œhe-sheā€ in the presence of fellow employees as well as high-level officials involved in the operation of the court system buildings. Carter viewed his treatment by Allen as a form of bullying and disrespect, the lawsuit states.

Over the next three years, according to the lawsuit, Carter was subjected to a hostile work environment by supervisors who, among other things, made false claims that Carter was not doing his job properly, was absent from work without permission, and was acting ā€œaggressivelyā€ toward his supervisors or fellow employees. One supervisor blamed Carterā€™s alleged hostile behavior on the testosterone treatment that Carter was undergoing as a routine part of his gender transition process, the lawsuit says.

The lawsuit alleges that Carter was ultimately fired ā€œon a false pretextā€ allegedly fabricated by James Vaughn, the Chief Building Engineer and Acting Building Operations Manager of the D.C. Courts. The lawsuit and appeals court briefs say Vaughn accused Carter of consuming an alcoholic beverage at one of the court buildings where Carter was assigned to work on April 6, 2019.

Vaughn recommended to the court systemā€™s acting director of capital projects and facilities management that Carter be terminated from his job on grounds of violating Personnel Policy No. 800, which prohibits consuming illegal drugs or alcohol on court property while on duty.

ā€œThat allegation is factually untrue,ā€ the lawsuit states. ā€œMr. Carter neither consumed nor was under the influence of alcohol while on site,ā€ it says.

ā€œMr. Carterā€™s termination was unjustified on any legitimate ground and was an act of unlawful discrimination on account of Mr. Carterā€™s race, sex, sexual orientation and/or gender identity and expression, and in retaliation for his complaining to his superiors about his illicit mistreatment on these grounds,ā€ the lawsuit and the current appeals court briefs charge.

ā€œThese acts and omissions caused Mr. Carter loss of employment, loss of pay and other benefits of employment, as well as anguish, intense hurt, humiliation, anger, sense of loss, disappointment, and emotional conflict between his desire for professional excellence and the torment inflicted on him merely for showing up every day, working, and working well, as an African American, as a lesbian, and as a transgender male,ā€ the lawsuit says. 

ā€œThe acts of one or more of Mr. Carterā€™s superiors alleged in this complaint were motivated by actual malice and/or evil intent and were done with the intention to cause Mr. Carter pain, humiliation, anguish and torment, and as such warrant the imposition of punitive damages,ā€ the lawsuit concludes.

A spokesperson for the Office of the D.C. Attorney General said the office is preparing a statement in response to an inquiry from the Blade on Carterā€™s discrimination allegations. (We will update this story when we receive the statement.) Among the names appearing on the AG officeā€™s court briefs in the Carter lawsuit is D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine, who has expressed strong support for LGBTQ rights in the past.

Douglas Buchanan, a spokesperson for the D.C. Courts, said he would try to determine whether the court systemā€™s building maintenance department would respond to a Blade request for comment on the Carter lawsuit and its allegations that high-level court officials in the maintenance department engaged in anti-transgender discrimination.

Pershing said he plans to file a separate lawsuit on Carterā€™s behalf in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia claiming the discrimination Carter faced violated his constitutional rights. He said he is hopeful that the D.C. Court of Appeals will rule in Carterā€™s favor, but a backlog in cases will likely mean a ruling would not take place before June of this year.

Under federal court rules, Carter must file his federal discrimination lawsuit in the U.S. District Court within three years from the time he was fired from his job in June of 2019.

Congress created the D.C. court system as a federal entity shortly before it created D.C.ā€™s home rule government in the early 1970s. The U.S. president nominates, and the U.S. Senate confirms all judges. The D.C. Council and mayor have no control over the court system, with Congress funding the system. The system is run by a Joint Committee on Judicial Administration consisting of five judges and a secretary who serves as the executive officer.

Previous D.C. Court of Appeals rulings have held that the D.C. government rather than the D.C. Courts’ system itself must be named as the defendant in lawsuits seeking redress from the D.C. Courts.

Dion Carter (Photo courtesy of India Rogers)

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

District of Columbia

LGBTQ budget advocates fight for D.C. resources in a tough fiscal year

‘Trying to preserve life-saving services’ amid $1 billion cut

Published

on

Heidi Ellis, coordinator of the DC LGBT Budget Coalition. (Photo courtesy of Heidi Ellis)

The months and days leading up to June are especially busy for LGBTQ Washingtonians. For one group, the DC LGBT Budget Coalition, which works year-round to ensure LGBTQ residents are represented and financially supported by the D.C. government, this time of year is their Super Bowl. Beginning in April, the D.C. Council and Mayorā€™s Office hold budget hearings for the next fiscal year.

With D.C.’s budget now under review, the Washington Blade spoke with Heidi Ellis, coordinator of the DC LGBT Budget Coalition, about the groupā€™s top priorities and their push to ensure continued support for queer communities.

ā€œThe LGBTQ Budget Coalition was founded in 2020 at the height of the pandemic, as a way for the community to work together to advocate for key funding and policy changes,ā€ Ellis said. ā€œWe recognized we were stronger together. A lot of groups are often pitted against each other for resources and dollars. This coalition was founded out of a need for unity. Since then, weā€™ve successfully advocated for more than $20 million in dedicated LGBTQ investments.ā€

In addition to coordinating the coalition, Ellis is the founder and CEO of HME Consulting & Advocacy, a firm that helps build coalitions and advance policy initiatives that address intersectional issues in the LGBTQ community. One of its most powerful tools, she explained, is direct outreach through community surveys.

ā€œWe actually do community surveys to see what people need and whatā€™s top of mind,ā€ Ellis said. ā€œOf course, we also pay attention to the broader political landscape ā€” like the current threats to HIV funding. That helps us prioritize.ā€

Because the coalition is comprised of more than 20 organizations across various sectors ā€”healthcare, housing, community organizing ā€” Ellis said its diversity enables it to connect grassroots needs to potential policy solutions.

ā€œOur coalition includes service providers, community groups, health and housing advocates-folks who are deeply plugged into whatā€™s happening on the ground,ā€ she said. ā€œThey help determine our direction. We know we donā€™t represent every queer person in D.C., but our coalition reflects a wide range of identities and experiences.ā€

The insights gathered through those surveys ultimately inform the coalitionā€™s annual budget proposal, which is submitted to the Council and mayor.

ā€œThatā€™s how we got to our FY26 priorities,ā€ she said. ā€œThis year, more than ever, weā€™re fighting to protect what weā€™ve already secured ā€” funding and policies weā€™ve had to fight for in the past. We know thereā€™s concern around this budget.ā€

One of the challenges this year is that the D.C. governmentā€™s operating budget and some of its legislation must be approved by Congress. With a projected decline in tax revenue and a Republican-controlled Congress that has historically opposed LGBTQ funding, the Coalition has had to think strategically.

ā€œEven before the situation on the Hill, the CFO projected lower revenue,ā€ Ellis said. ā€œThat meant cuts to social programs were already coming. And now, with the $1 billion slashed from D.C.ā€™s budget due to the continuing resolution, weā€™re not only fighting for D.C.ā€™s budget and autonomy, but also trying to preserve life-saving services. Our message is simple: Donā€™t forget about queer people.ā€

This yearā€™s proposal doesnā€™t include specific dollar figures. Instead, the Coalition outlines five funding priority areas: Healthcare, Employment & Economic Equity, Housing, Safety & Community Support, and Civil Rights.

Why no exact amounts? Ellis said itā€™s because not all solutions are financial.

ā€œSome of our asks donā€™t require new funding. Others build on existing programs-weā€™re asking whether the current use of funds is the most effective. Weā€™re also proposing policy changes that wouldnā€™t cost extra but could make a real difference. Itā€™s about using what we have better,ā€ she said.

When drafting the proposal, the Coalition tries to prioritize those with the most pressing and intersecting needs.

ā€œOur perspective is: If we advocate for the most vulnerable, others benefit too,ā€ Ellis said. ā€œTake LGBTQ seniors. Some may have done well in life but now face housing insecurity or struggle to access affordable healthcare. Many in our coalition are elders who fought on the frontlines during the AIDS epidemic. They bring critical historical context and remind us that Black and brown communities bore the brunt of that crisis.ā€

ā€œI love our coalition because it keeps us accountable to the moment,ā€ she added. ā€œIf we center those most marginalized, we can make an impact that lifts everyone.ā€

In addition to healthcare and housing, safety remains a top concern. The Coalition has fought to maintain funding for the Violence Prevention and Response Team (VPART), a city-supported group that includes MPD, community-based organizations, and the Mayorā€™s Office of LGBTQ Affairs. VPART responds to crimes affecting the LGBTQ community and connects victims to legal, healthcare, and housing services.

ā€œWeā€™ve pushed to make VPART more proactive, not just reactive,ā€ Ellis said. ā€œThe funding weā€™ve secured has helped survivors get the support they need. Cutting that funding now would undo progress weā€™re just beginning to see.ā€

At the end of the day, Ellis emphasized that this process is about far more than spreadsheets.

ā€œA budget is a moral document,ā€ she said. ā€œIf weā€™re not represented, youā€™re telling us our lives donā€™t matter at a time when we need protection the most. When people canā€™t get food, medicine, housing ā€” that has a devastating impact. These are vital services.ā€

The DC LGBT Budget Coalition is urging residents to support a letter-writing campaign to D.C. Council members and the mayor. You can send a letter here: https://actionnetwork.org/letters/fully-fund-dcs-lgbtq-communities

Read the full FY26 budget proposal here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bTrENnc4ZazJTO6LPrQ3lZkF02QNIIf1/view

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

Reenactment of 1965 gay rights protest at White House set for April 17

Event to mark 60thĀ anniversary of historic picketing

Published

on

Among those expected to participate in the April 17 White House reenactment picketing is longtime D.C. LGBTQ rights advocate Paul Kuntzler, who is shown here participating in a similar reenactment event in front of the White House one year ago. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

D.C.ā€™s Rainbow History Project is inviting members of the local LGBTQ community and its supporters to participate in a reenactment of what it calls the historic 1965 first gay rights protest outside the White House.

The event is scheduled to begin at 4 p.m. Thursday, April 17 on the sidewalk in front of the White House.

In a statement, Rainbow History Project says the 1965 protest was organized by local gay rights pioneers Frank Kameny and Lilli Vincenz on behalf of the Mattachine Society of Washington, one of D.C.ā€™s first gay rights groups that Kameny co-founded in the early 1960s.

ā€œLed by Dr. Kameny and Dr. Vincenz, picketers demanded action on the Mattachine Societyā€™s four major issues: the exclusion of homosexuals from Federal employment; the punitive policies of the U.S. Military; blanket denial of security clearances to gay people; and government refusal to meet with the LGBTQ community,ā€ the statement says.  

The statement referred to the titles of Kameny and Vincenz in connection with their academic doctorate degrees  

ā€œAlthough Dr. Kameny died in 2011, and Dr. Vincenz in 2023, Rainbow History Project and its all-volunteer corps will picket in their honor and demonstrate there is a new generation of young activists ready to take up their signs and their fight for equal rights for all LGBTQ people,ā€ the statement says.

Among those expected to participate in the April 17 White House reenactment picketing is longtime D.C. LGBTQ rights advocate Paul Kuntzler, who is the last known survivor of the 1965 White House gay rights protest. Kuntzler was expected to carry a picket sign similar to the one he carried in 1965.

In its research on the 1965 gay White House protest, Rainbow History Project learned of a letter that Kameny sent to then President Lyndon B. Johnson outlining the demands of the White House protesters.

ā€œWe ask, Mr. President, for what all American citizens ā€“ singly and collectively ā€“ have the right to ask,ā€ the Kameny letter states. ā€œThat our problems be given fair, unbiased considerationā€¦consideration in which we, ourselves, are allowed to participate actively and are invited to do so.ā€

The RHP statement says the group ā€œwill carry replicas of the original protest signs and hand out literature explaining the picket to passersby and tourists.ā€ Ā Ā 

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

Final push to raise funds, fill D.C. hotels as WorldPride nears

ā€˜We would have liked to see the city fully sold out at this pointā€™

Published

on

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser budgeted $5 million for WorldPride, which was approved by the Council. Capital Pride Alliance is now working to raise an additional $2 million. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

A final push to raise money and fill D.C. hotel rooms is underway with WorldPride 2025 just over a month away.

The Capital Pride Alliance, the D.C.-based group thatā€™s organizing WorldPride 2025 in the nationā€™s capital thatā€™s scheduled to take place May 17-June 8 launched what it says is one of several fundraising campaigns in a full-page ad in the Washington Post on April 1.

With a large headline declaring, ā€œHate Is No Joke,ā€ a message in the ad states, ā€œDecades of progress in human rights are under coordinated, systematic attack. Today itā€™s focused on gender, sexual orientation, and race. But whatā€™s next?ā€

The message then states, ā€œTake Action. Take a stand. Donate now at WorldPrideDC.org/give.ā€

That site says its goal is to raise $2 million. As of April 14, the site says $12,041 had been raised from 69 donors.

In response to a request by the Washington Blade for comment on what prompted this particular fundraising campaign, Capital Pride Alliance released a statement saying the campaign was part of its ongoing effort to promote WorldPride and its multiple events.

ā€œThe Hate Is No Joke campaign is one of multiple fundraising campaigns that have been planned around the lead-up to WorldPride 2025,ā€ the statement says. ā€œSimilar to CPAā€™s annual Giving Tuesday campaign and the current Taste of Pride citywide initiative, this campaign is intended to raise awareness for and funds to support WorldPride.ā€

The statement says the ā€œHate Is No Jokeā€ campaign is being led by the local event planning company Linder Global Events, which D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser retained to work with Capital Pride Alliance in organizing WorldPride 2025.

Capital Pride Alliance Executive Director Ryan Bos told the Blade last month that CPA had set up a budget of between $15 million and $20 million for WorldPride 2025, with much of the funding coming from corporate donors. At the request of MayorĀ Bowser, the D.C. Council approved $5 million in city funding for WorldPride.

ā€œAnd like we do every year for an organization like ours, which is event based, we do our best every year to come under budget,ā€ Bos said in referring to the cityā€™s annual Capital Pride celebration and events. ā€œSo, we are doing our best to save whenever we can and to ensure that we have a safe and successful WorldPride,ā€ he said.

In its statement responding to the Bladeā€™s inquiry about the Hate Is No Joke fundraising campaign, Capital Pride Alliance said it has learned through the international LGBTQ advocacy organization InterPride, which plays a role in organizing WorldPride events, that visitors from at least 20 countries were expected to come to D.C. for WorldPride 2025.

Among those countries were Canada, Mexico, and several others from Europe, Asia, and Africa, including Uganda and Zimbabwe, as well as India, Spain, Italy, United Kingdom, China, and Thailand.

Elliott Ferguson, president and CEO of Destination D.C., an organization that promotes tourism, visitation, and events in D.C., including events like WorldPride, said he is seeing signs that hotel reservations are increasing from visitors planning to come to D.C. for WorldPride. But he said he cannot predict whether as many as 2 million or more visitors will come as WorldPride organizers had predicted earlier this year.

At Capital Pride Allianceā€™s suggestion, Ferguson spoke with the Blade to address the question of whether the controversial statements and policies of President Donald Trump on world trade issues and tariffs involving longtime U.S. allies like Canada and Mexico as well as the Trump administrationā€™s hostile policies targeting the transgender community would prompt people, especially those from foreign countries, to choose not to come to D.C. for WorldPride.

ā€œIā€™m not sure,ā€ Ferguson told the Blade in an interview. ā€œYou know, I think thatā€™s the gray area in terms of how many people will come,ā€ he said.

ā€œBut reservations are being made. Weā€™re seeing more of an uptick,ā€ he told the Blade. ā€œAnd we remain optimistic as WorldPride organizers and Capital Pride organizers are really focusing on the celebration of the community thatā€™s happening in the city,ā€ he said.

Ferguson said he and Destination D.C. were joining WorldPride organizers in putting out the message that if people disagree with the Trump administrationā€™s policies on LGBTQ-related issues or any other issues, they should turn out for WorldPride to protest those policies.

Capital Pride officials have pointed out that among the many events planned for WorldPride is a national LGBTQ rights march on Washington that will begin at the Lincoln Memorial and travel to the U.S. Capitol.

ā€œThereā€™s a lot of consternation and concern about a lot of issues that have been brought to our attention by a lot of international travelers, including those that were looking at coming for WorldPride,ā€ Ferguson said.

ā€œWhat weā€™ve said to them is, you know, coming to WorldPride from a global perspective focusing on freedom of speech and First Amendment rights here in the U.S. is a huge part of why you should be here,ā€ he added. 

ā€œSo, as we talk to hotels, we would have liked to see the city fully sold out at this point,ā€ he said. ā€œBut we are seeing momentum in terms of reservations being made and people coming to Washington.ā€ 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular