World
Out in the World: LGBTQ news from Europe, Asia, and Oceania
European Court of Human Rights rules Switzerland cannot deport gay Iranian refugee

SWITZERLAND
The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that Switzerland cannot deport a gay Iranian refugee claimant, finding that the stateās argument that heād be safe as long as heās discreet is not reasonable.
The decision, which was delivered Nov. 12, applies to all 46 members of the European Convention on Human Rights.Ā
The Swiss government acknowledged that the refugee claimant, known in the case as M.I., was a gay man and that gay men face persecution from state and non-state actors in his country of origin, Iran. But Switzerland had denied M.I.ās asylum claim, arguing that he could avoid persecution by using discretion and restraint in expressing his sexuality and that it was unlikely his sexual orientation would become known to Iranian authorities otherwise.
The court found this reasoning wrong, noting that M.I.ās sexual orientation could be discovered if he were deported to Iran, and the state had not addressed whether Iranian authorities would provide him with protection against ill-treatment. The court ordered Switzerland to reconsider M.I.ās claim in light of the lack of this protection.
Homosexuality is illegal in Iran, with penalties including beatings and death. The court ruling notes that given criminalization of homosexuality, it is unreasonable to assume that an LGBTQ person can seek protection from authorities in Iran.
Jacqueline McKenzie, a lawyer who represented Stonewall UK and African Rainbow Family in their intervention in the case, calls the decision a āwatershedā that would help ensure protection for LGBTQ asylum seekers across Europe.
āI am delighted for not just my clients, Stonewall and African Rainbow Family, but for all gay people who continue to face the threat of removal to several countries where gay sex is prohibited by law and penal codes, and where in some instances, punishable by death, on the basis that they can be discreet about their sexuality,ā McKenzie says in a statement.
āThis is a watershed ruling that puts an end to the reasoning that it is safe to return gay men who are discreet about their sexuality to countries where they would be in danger if their sexuality were to be discovered.ā
ROMANIA
An LGBTQ activist is making history as the first openly queer person to run for parliament in upcoming elections set for Dec. 1.
Florin Buhuceanu is running for the liberal Renewing Romaniaās European Project Party (REPER), a minor party that splintered from the Save Romania Union two years ago and currently holds 10 seats in the 330-seat lower house.
He says heās running to advance LGBTQ rights, including the recognition of same-sex unions, which all political parties in Romania have refused to do so far.
Buhuceanu has a history of advocacy on same-sex couplesā rights. In 2019, he and his partner of 10 years joined 20 other couples in suing the government at the European Court of Human Rights over Romaniaās refusal to recognize same-sex couples. Last year, they won their case, and Romania was ordered to recognize same-sex couples in a decision that set an important precedent continent-wide.
But more than a year later, nothing has changed in Romania, because politicians have lacked the will to implement civil unions in the deeply conservative country. Buhuceanu says the lack of progress threatens democracy and rule of law.
āIt’s sad that Romanian politicians are so lacking in courage to look around them and open up their eyes to the realities that are under their nose,ā Buhuceanu told the news outlet Context. āThis issue cannot be separated from what’s going on with the democracy status of Romania. It’s inconceivable to have final judgments that are not respected immediately.ā
Buhuceanu also helped organize Romaniaās first gay pride festival and led Accept, the countryās leading LGBTQ advocacy group. Buhuceanu and his partner also curate an LGBTQ history museum in their home in Bucharest, which is open to the public on weekends.
He says heās running for parliament to drive change for the LGBTQ community.
āIt’s the only community I’m aware of with zero political representation and this has to change,” Buhuceanu says. āWe cannot wait, we should mobilize our people to occupy as many positions as possible. Otherwise, the anti-gender movement, these extreme political parties, will try to occupy the vacuum we have produced.ā
JAPAN
A man is suing the Japanese government after a judge barred him from wearing rainbow-colored socks to a court hearing on same-sex marriage last year.
Ken Suzuki was wearing the rainbow-patterned socks when he attempted to observe the same-sex marriage trial in Fukuoka District Court in June 2023. He says he was told by court officials to hide the rainbow pattern ahead of the trial, and was only admitted after he folded the pattern inward, obscuring it.
Heās now joined two other individuals who were ordered to change or hide clothing with various expressions before attending other unrelated cases in a case before the Tokyo District Court seeking 3.3 million yen (approximately $21,000) in damages.
Suzuki claims that the court overstepped its authority to maintain order by requiring that he remove the socks, as they did not disrupt the court proceedings. He also says the order was inconsistent, as he was able to wear the socks without issue while attending a different same-sex marriage trial at the Tokyo District Court.
Several courts across Japan are weighing the rights of same-sex couples. Five of six lower courts that have heard same-sex marriage cases have ruled that the ban on same-sex marriage violates the constitution, as have two superior courts that have heard challenges. Further court hearings are expected in superior courts, and eventually at the Supreme Court.
VANUATU
Vanuatuās parliament has amended its marriage laws to explicitly ban same-sex marriage, amid a new crackdown on LGBTQ people in the South Pacific island nation.
Prior to passage of the marriage law amendment, Vanuatuās Marriage Act neither explicitly forbade nor permitted same-sex marriage. The new law now states that same-sex marriages may not be registered in Vanuatu.
Interior Minister Andrew Napuat told Radio New Zealand the law expresses the governmentās opposition to LGBTQ couples. He also threatened anyone who attempts to conduct a same-sex marriage with revocation of their license.
āWhen the law was passed (Nov. 14), it made clear the government’s full intention, along with our leaders, that every pastor who performs marriage ceremonies must understand that they cannot conduct a ceremony that is against the law and expect it to be registered,ā Napuat says.
āIf anyone conducts a marriage that does not follow the spirit of the law passed today and seeks our registration, his or her license will be revoked to prevent further marriages. This applies to religious, civil, or traditional ceremonies.ā
Earlier this month, the Justice and Community Services Ministry announced it was forming a committee to draft a national policy banning LGBTQ advocacy in Vanuatu.
The proposed crackdown comes after the president of Vanuatuās Council of Traditional Chiefs said the activities of the countryās LGBTQ advocacy group VPride threaten traditional values and Christian beliefs.
While Vanuatu is a deeply conservative country, same-sex activity has never been illegal since independence from Britain and France in 1980.
Kenya
Kenya Red Cross-owned hotel to host anti-LGBTQ conference
Speakers from US, European countries to participate in May 12-17 gathering

Plans to host a family values meeting next month in a 5-star hotel in Nairobi that the Kenya Red Cross Society co-owns have sparked an uproar among local queer rights groups.
The groups accuse the Kenya Red Cross of violating its Global Fund commitment of protecting key populations by allowing its Boma Hotel to host an āanti-gender and anti-LGBTQā conference.
Influential guest speakers from the U.S., the Netherlands, Spain, and Poland will preside over the Pan-African Conference on Family Values that will take place from May 12-17. The Kenyan advocacy groups say these speakersā organizations are globally recognized for undermining LGBTQ rights.
āAs the principal recipient of Global Fund in Kenya, hosting this event contradicts (the) Red Crossās humanitarian mission and threatens the safety and dignity of people living with HIV, women and LGBTQ+ individuals, the communities that Kenya Red Cross Society has long committed to supporting,ā the queer rights groups state.
The LGBTQ groups that have criticized the Kenya Red Cross include Upinde Advocates for Inclusion, the Initiative for Equality and Non-Discrimination, and Gay and Lesbian Coalition of Kenya. They have also launched an online signature collection drive to compel the Kenya Red Cross to withdraw the hotel from hosting the āPromoting and Protecting Family Values in Challenging Timesā-themed conference.
āThe eventās so-called ‘family values’ narrative is a smokescreen for policies that push hateful legislation and promote death, discrimination, femicide, gender-based violence, and restrict fundamental freedoms across Africa,ā the groups said.
The pro-life Western organizations that are scheduled to participate in the conference include Family Watch International from the U.S., CitizenGo from Spain, the Ordo Luris Institute from Poland, Christian Council International from the Netherlands, the New York-based Center for Family and Human Rights (C-FAM), and the Foundation for American Cultural Heritage. Their local counterparts include the National Council of Churches of Kenya, the Kenya Christian Professionals Forum, the Africa Christian Professionals Forum, and the Evangelical Alliance of Kenya.
C-FAM President Austin Ruse; Family Research Council Vice President for Policy and Government Affairs Travis Wever; Global Life Campaign Executive Director Thomas W. Jacobson; and the Rev. Ricky Chelette, executive director of Living Hope Ministries, Inc., and president of the Institute of Biblical Sexuality are among the U.S. guest speakers. Other participants include Henk Jan van Schthorst, president of Christian Council Internationalās board of directors, Ordo Luris Institute President Jerzy Kwasniewskie and his colleague, Rafal Dorosinski, director of the groupās Legal Analysis Center.Ā
The Kenyan groups through their online petition ā āTell Red Cross Kenya Not to Give Hate a Platformā ā has so far raised more than 1,000 of the 10,000 signatures they hope to collect. The petition is addressed to Red Cross Kenya Secretary-General Ahmed Idris and his predecessor, Abbas Gullet, who is the hotelās director.
āWe call on you to immediately cancel this booking and publicly reaffirm Red Crossā commitment to human rights, health and inclusivity,ā the petition reads. āFailure to act will raise concerns about whether (the) Red Cross can still be trusted by the community to lead with empathy and fight for their rights.ā
The Kenya Red Cross, however, maintains the Boma Hotel is a separate entity, even though public records indicate it is one of the facilityās shareholders.
The LGBTQ groups note the hotel should be a safe space that promotes inclusion, not platforms that enable āharmful gatheringā for hate and exclusion by ādangerous groups.ā
āBy providing a venue for this event, Red Cross directly enables a platform for hate and discrimination ā a stark contradiction to the values of inclusivity, humanity, and nondiscrimination that the organization claims to uphold,ā they said. Ā
The organizations further warn that proceeding to host the conference threatens the relationship between the Red Cross and the marginalized communities who have long depended on the humanitarian organization for support and protection. CitizenGo has nonetheless criticized the LGBTQ groups, which it describes as āradical activist groupsā for ātrying to silence a pro-family eventā and asked the Kenya Red Cross and the Boma Hotel not to back down.
āThese groups are calling the event ‘hateful’ because it affirms the natural family ā marriage between a man and a woman ā and the dignity of every human life, including the unborn,ā Ann Kioko, the groupās campaign director for Africa and the U.N., said.
Through an online counter signature collection drive, Kioko holds CitizenGo and other groups wonāt be intimidated, silenced or apologize to the queer rights groups for defending āour families, our faith and our futureā.
āThe real goal of these foreign-funded activist groups is to impose LGBTQ and gender ideologies on Africa ā ideologies that have led elsewhere to the confusion of children, the breakdown of family structures and the rise of sexual libertinism that results in abortion, STIs and lifelong emotional and psychological trauma,ā Kioko stated.
India
Opposition from religious groups prompts Indian Pride group to cancel annual parade
Event was to have taken place in Amritsar on April 27

Pride Amritsar, a student-led organization in the Indian state of Punjab, earlier this month announced the cancellation of its Pride parade that was scheduled to take place on April 27, citing opposition from certain religious groups.
The event, planned for the Rose Garden in Amritsar, a city revered as a spiritual center of Sikhism, had faced mounting resistance from Sikh religious organizations, including the Nihang Singh faction and the Akal Takht, the faithās highest temporal authority. These groups labeled the parade as āunnaturalā and urged local authorities to deny permission, citing its potential to disrupt the cityās religious sanctity.
In an Instagram post on April 6, Pride Amritsar organizers Ridham Chadha and Ramit Seth elaborated on its mission and the reasons for the cancellation.
āSince 2019, we have organized peaceful parades and celebrations in Amritsar to connect and uplift the LGBTQIA+ community, with a particular focus on transgender individuals and their rights,ā their statement read.
Chadha and Seth highlighted Pride Amritsar efforts in providing guidance, counseling, and job opportunities, which have been met with positive responses. However, due to opposition this year, Pride Amritsar announced the cancellation of the 2025 parade.
āWe have no intention of harming the sentiments of any religious or political groups,ā the statement read. āThe safety of our members is our top priority, and we will take all necessary measures to ensure their protection.ā
Chadha and Seth spoke with the Washington Blade about their decision to cancel the parade.
They explained that resistance came from both religious and political groups who labeled the parade and its values as anti-Sikh and contrary to Punjabi and Indian cultural norms. Critics specifically objected to the eventās location in Amritsar, a city regarded as a sacred center of Sikhism, arguing that the parade would disrupt its spiritual purity.
Chadha and Seth stressed Pride Amritsar lacks political, financial, or legal support. Composed of students and young professionals, the group organizes the parade biennially, dedicating personal time to advocate for the LGBTQ community.
āWe do it independently, crowdfund the parade and cover the rest with our pockets,ā said Seth and Chadha.
When asked by the Blade why Pride Amritsar did not approach the High Court or local authorities to protect the parade, despite the Supreme Courtās 2018 ruling that decriminalized consensual same-sex sexual relations, Chadha and Seth cited significant barriers.
āPursuing legal action in India requires substantial resources, both financial and temporal,ā they explained.
Chadha and Seth also noted that such action could lead to public shaming and unwanted publicity for participants, potentially harming their careers in Amritsar. They therefore chose not to pursue legal recourse.
Chadha and Seth said Pride Amritsar does not have any plans to hold alternative events.
āWe are still exploring options, but we are likely not holding any events this year,ā they said, citing significant harassment that organizers faced and the need for time to plan how to best serve the local LGBTQ community moving forward.
āOur evaluation of what the biggest challenge is has changed after this year,ā said Chadha and Seth to the Washington Blade. āThe biggest challenge, by far, seems to be education. We need to educate the community about what the community is, does, and why it exists. Why we do parades. Why we dance. Why calling someone āchakkaā is harmful. How we actually fit into religion and fall within the guidelines.ā
Chadha and Seth said organizing the parade in Amritsar since 2019 has been an uplifting experience, despite continued opposition.
āThe moment you join the parade, chant a slogan, or sing a song, itās transformative,ā they said. āFear vanishes, and a sense of freedom takes over.ā
The cancellation of the 2025 Amritsar Pride Parade has sparked concerns among activists in Punjab, as the Indian Express reported.
The Punjab LGBT Alliance and other groups expressed concern that the decision to cancel the parade may strengthen opposition to future LGBTQ-specific events.
Australia
Australian LGBTQ rights group issues US travel advisory
Equality Australia warns transgender, nonbinary people of ‘serious risks’

An LGBTQ rights group in Australia has issued a travel advisory for transgender and nonbinary people who plan to visit the U.S.
Equality Australia on April 14 posted the advisory to its website that states the U.S. government’s policy on visas and Electronic System for Travel Authorization or ESTA “appears to be” the following:
⢠To use the term ābiological sexā
⢠To only use the gender marker recorded at a personās birth, even if this differs from their gender
⢠That valid foreign passports with an ‘X’ gender marker and a valid visa (if needed) may continue to be admitted, however this is contingent upon satisfying inspection of their admissibility by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer at the port of entry
⢠That any previously issued, valid visa may remain current until its expiration date and the visa holder does not need to apply for a new visa with an amended gender marker until the current visa expires (it is unclear whether this applies to ESTAs)
⢠That new visas will only be issued under the gender marker recorded for the applicant at birth (it is unclear whether this applies to ESTA applications, although only ‘M’ and ‘F’ gender marker options are available for ESTA applications)
⢠That if consular officers assessing visa applications become aware an application does not contain the gender marker recorded at the applicantās birth, they should assess additional evidence (such as previous travel records, although the scope is unclear), and/or conduct interviews and
⢠That where individuals are not using the gender marker recorded at their birth, consular officers should consider classifying the application as procuring a visa through material misrepresentation or fraud, which results in a lifetime bar from the U.S.
President Donald Trump shortly after he took office on Jan. 20 issued an executive order that bans the State Department from issuing passports with āXā gender markers. Secretary of State Marco Rubio in response to directive ordered State Department personnel to āsuspend any application requesting an āXā sex marker and do not take any further action pending additional guidance from the department.ā A federal judge in Boston on April 18 issued a temporary injunction against the Trump-Vance administration’s directive.
Equality Australia says its advisory is “relevant if you are traveling to the U.S.” and fall under the following criteria:
⢠Hold a passport with a gender ‘X’ marker
⢠Have identity documents with gender markers different to those assigned to you at birth, or where other relevant details (such as your name) have been changed
⢠Have gender markers in your identity documents that do not match your gender expression
⢠Have a track record of LGBTIQ+ activism or other political activity.
“Travel to the U.S. carries serious risks that should be considered before planning any travel, particularly if you fall under one of the above categories,” reads the advisory.
Germany, Denmark, Finland, and the Netherlands are among the countries that have issued travel advisories for trans and nonbinary people who plan to visit the U.S.
WorldPride is scheduled to take place in D.C. from May 17-June 8.
InterPride, the organization that coordinates WorldPride events, on March 12 issued its own travel advisory for trans and nonbinary people who want to travel to the U.S. Egale Canada, one of Canadaās largest LGBTQ advocacy organizations, in February announced its members will not attend WorldPride and any other event in the U.S. because of the Trump-Vance administrationās policies.
-
Federal Government3 days ago
HHS to retire 988 crisis lifeline for LGBTQ youth
-
Opinions3 days ago
David Hoggās arrogant, self-indulgent stunt
-
District of Columbia3 days ago
D.C. police seek help in identifying suspect in anti-gay threats case
-
Virginia3 days ago
Gay talk show host wins GOP nom for Va. lieutenant guv