Connect with us

News

Clinton, Sanders speak out against Miss. ‘religious freedom’ law

2016 hopefuls says no excuse for anti-LGBT discrimination

Published

on

Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, gay news, Washington Blade

Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, gay news, Washington Blade

Democratic presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders (Photos by Gino Santa Maria; courtesy Bigstock)

Democratic presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Bernard Sanders have joined the voices objecting to the newly enacted “religious freedom” law in Mississippi seen to enable sweeping anti-LGBT discrimination.

The campaign for Sanders was first to articulate opposition to bill via a Twitter post late Tuesday hours after Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant signed the measure into law.

The Clinton campaign responded via Twitter to the Mississippi law more than 24 hours after Bryant signed the measure. The tweet isn’t signed with an “-H,” which would have indicated the message came directly from Clinton and not the campaign.

The Mississippi law, House Bill 1523, is considered the most sweeping law in the nation to enable anti-LGBT discrimination in the name of ā€œreligious freedom.ā€ It allows individuals, businesses and non-profit to deny services to same-sex couples and LGBT people. The measure also permits medical professionals to deny transition-related treatment to transgender people.

It’s not the first time Clinton has followed Sanders by several hours in denouncing an anti-LGBT state measure signed into law. After North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory signed anti-LGBT House Bill 2, Sanders responded shortly afterward, but Clinton responded nearly 24 hours after the governor signed the measure and 11 hours after Sanders.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Chile

Transgender woman sues Chilean national police

Isabella Panes alleges she suffered harassment, exclusion after becoming ā€˜carabinera’

Published

on

Isabella Panes (Courtesy photo)

Isabella Panes in 2022 was celebrated as a symbol of inclusion. 

Wearing an olive green uniform and a shy smile, she appeared in the media and on social media as Chile’s first trans female ā€œcarabineraā€ or national police officer. The Carabineros promoted Panes as a sign of openness, but that story has become a dramatic case of institutional discrimination.

Panes today faces the Carabineros in court.

She has denounced a series of systematic acts of exclusion, harassment at work and violation of fundamental rights that she and her defense team maintains pushed her into a mental health crisis that almost cost her her life.

ā€œMy hope is that tomorrow we will be able to live in a world of equality for all. Just that we understand that we are human beings and we have to make life a lot easier for each other,ā€ Panes told the Washington Blade during an exclusive interview.

Panes, 29, grew up in Laja in the BiobĆ­o region.

She dreamed of becoming a ā€œcarabineraā€ since she was a child, despite the fact that she faced discrimination because of her gender identity. After years of effort, surgeries and a difficult transition, Panes enrolled in the Carabineros Academy in 2021.

Panes faced the challenge of making her medical processes compatible with the physical demands of training. Even so, she graduated with good marks, and was recognized as part of the new institutional image the Carabineros wanted to project after the 2021 social unrest tarnished their image.

This institutional support disappeared after the media campaign.

Panes alleges she was marginalized from operational duties and relegated to administrative tasks, despite her interest in and training to patrol the streets like any other officers.

ā€œI joined the Carabineros to serve, not to be a marketing decoration,ā€ she said. ā€œI was offered to be part of the change, but only if I kept quiet and accepted the mistreatment.ā€

The accusations against the Carabineros are serious: Constant mockery by colleagues, dissemination of private information about her personal life, invasive questions about her body and sexual orientation. Panes’s legal representatives said this abuse took place within a context where the institution did not take effective measures to protect their client.

The Carabineros Social Security Administration, known by the Spanish acronym Dipreca, also refused to cover her transition-related medical procedures, arguing they were ā€œaesthetic,ā€ despite medical reports that indicated their importance for Panes’s mental health and well-being.

Panes in January attempted to kill herself by suicide. She managed to survive after calling Chile’s 4141 mental health care number for help.

ā€œThey were killing me slowly, from the inside,ā€ said Panes.

Panes has brought her case to the Supreme Court after a lower court ruled in favor of Dipreca’s decision to not cover her medical treatments.

Her legal team in a lawsuit has also accused the Carabineros of employment and systematic discrimination. Panes is seeking damages and institutional reforms.

ā€œThe Carabineros used Isabella to clean up its public image, but when it came to guaranteeing real rights, they abandoned her,ā€ said Javiera Zúñiga, spokesperson for the Movement for Homosexual Integration and Liberation, a Chilean advocacy group.

ā€œIt is not enough to show up at the Pride march,ā€ she added. ā€œTrue inclusion is demonstrated in deeds, in daily dealings, in respect for the dignity of all people.ā€

Panes’s case starkly exposes the limits of diversity policies when there is no deep institutional commitment to implement them.

ā€œI am no longer afraid,ā€ said Panes, ā€What happened to me cannot happen again. Not for me, but for all those who come after me.ā€

Continue Reading

Brazil

US lists transgender Brazilian congresswoman’s gender as ‘male’ on visa

Erika Hilton has represented SĆ£o Paulo since 2022

Published

on

Brazilian Congresswoman Erika Hilton speaks at an LGBTQ Victory Institute-sponsored conference in BrasĆ­lia, Brazil, in 2023. (Photo by Ester

A transgender Brazilian congresswoman says the U.S. issued her a visa that listed her gender as “male.”

Erika Hilton on Wednesday wrote on her Instagram page that she requested a visa that would have allowed her to travel to the U.S. in order to participate in the Brazil Conference at Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

The conference took place earlier this month.

“I was classified as ‘male’ by the U.S. government when I went to get my visa,” wrote Hilton, who added a visa she received from the U.S. in 2023 listed her gender as “female.”

Hilton is a Black travesti and former sex worker from SĆ£o Paulo who won a seat in the Brazilian Congress in 2022. The Washington Blade spoke with Hilton shortly after her election.

ā€œIt is a big responsibility … but I feel very honored,ā€ said Hilton. ā€œI very much like to be able to be a representative for my people, and the more than 250,000 people who voted for me have confidence in me,” she said after she spoke at a rally in support of now Brazilian President Luiz InĆ”cio Lula da Silva in a SĆ£o Paulo square. “This demonstrates that our work has the potential to have a gigantic reach; where we can advance efforts to end death, poverty, misery, genocide that we have.ā€

President Donald Trump in his inaugural speech announced the federal government’s “official policy” is “there are only two genders, male and female.” The Trump-Vance administration has also banned the State Department from issuing passports with “X” gender markers.

Germany and Denmark are among the countries that have issued travel advisories for trans and nonbinary people who plan to visit the U.S. These warnings come ahead of WorldPride, which is scheduled to take place in D.C. from May 17-June 8.

Hilton said she is “not surprised” the U.S. issued her a visa with a male gender marker.

“I’m also not surprised by the level of hatred and fixation these people have with trans people,” she said. “After all, the documents I presented are rectified, and I’m registered as a woman, even on my birth certificate.”

Hilton further accused the U.S. of “ignoring official documents from other sovereign nations, even from a diplomatic representative.”

“At the end of the day, I’m a Brazilian citizen, and my rights are guaranteed and my existence is respected by our own constitution, legislation, and jurisprudence,” she said.

Continue Reading

U.S. Military/Pentagon

Pentagon urged to reverse Naval Academy book ban

Hundreds of titles discussing race, gender, and sexuality pulled from library shelves

Published

on

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

Lambda Legal and the Legal Defense Fund issued a letter on Tuesday urging U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to reverse course on a policy that led to the removal of 381 books from the Nimitz Library of the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Md.

Pursuant to President Donald Trump’s executive order 14190, “Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling,” the institution screened 900 titles to identify works promoting “diversity, equity, and inclusion,” removing those that concerned or touched upon “topics pertaining to the experiences of people of color, especially Black people, and/or LGBTQ people,” according to a press release from the civil rights organizations.

These included “I Know Why the Caged Bird Singsā€ by Maya Angelou, ā€œStone Fruitā€ by Lee Lai,Ā ā€œThe Hate U Giveā€ by Angie Thomas, ā€œLies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrongā€ by James W. Loewen, ā€œGender Queer: A Memoirā€ by Maia Kobabe, and ā€œDemocracy in Black: How Race Still Enslaves the American Soulā€ by Eddie S. Glaude, Jr.Ā 

The groups further noted that “the collection retained other books with messages and themes that privilege certain races and religions over others, including ‘The Clansman: A Historical Romance of the Ku Klux Klan’ by Thomas Dixon, Jr., ‘Mein Kampf’ by Adolf Hitler, and ‘Heart of Darkness’ by Joseph Conrad.

In their letter, Lambda Legal and LDF argued the books must be returned to circulation to preserve the “constitutional rights” of cadets at the institution, warning of the “danger” that comes with “censoring materials based on viewpoints disfavored by the current administration.”

“Such censorship is especially dangerous in an educational setting, where critical inquiry, intellectual diversity, and exposure to a wide array of perspectives are necessary to educate future citizen-leaders,”Ā Lambda Legal Chief Legal Officer Jennifer C. PizerĀ andĀ LDF Director of Strategic Initiatives Jin Hee Lee said in the press release.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular