Local
Ugly testimony at Md. marriage hearing
Opponents invoke pedophilia, incest while denouncing bill

ANNAPOLIS, Md. āĀ As many as 300 supporters and opponents of a bill to legalize same-sex marriage in Maryland packed the halls of a State Senate office building in Annapolis Tuesday while several dozen witnesses testified on both sides of the issue.
The Democratic-controlled Judicial Proceedings Committee, which conducted a hearing on the bill, was expected to approve the measure and send it to the full Senate within the next week or two.
A majority of the members of the 11-person committee are co-sponsors or supporters of the bill, the Religious Freedom and Civil Marriage Protection Act.
Most political observers believe supporters have the votes to pass the bill in the Senate and the House of Delegates. Gov. Martin OāMalley has said he would sign the bill.
But opponents, led by Maggie Gallagher, chair of the National Organization for Marriage, said they remain hopeful that supporters would fall short of obtaining the 24 votes needed to pass the bill in the Senate or the 29 votes needed to stop a Senate filibuster.
āMarriage is the union of husband and wife for a reason,ā Gallagher said in her testimony. āThese are the only unions that can make new life and connect children in love to their mom and dad ā¦ If Maryland adopts this radical new view of marriage, it will have consequences,ā she said.
Many of the witnesses testifying against the bill ā including ministers, an orthodox rabbi, and two Roman Catholic priests ā picked up on Gallagherās view that procreation is the cornerstone of marriage. They said changing the definition of marriage to include same-sex couples would have a detrimental impact on families and society.
An equal number of witnesses, including a Catholic nun and Catholic lay leaders, two reform rabbis and at least a half-dozen Protestant ministers, both black and white, disputed those assertions, saying they believe same-sex unions strengthen rather than harm the family. Many of the witnesses backing the bill identified themselves as people of faith.
āMy God loves everyone,ā said Elbridge James, a lobbyist for the NAACP and director the Maryland Black Family Alliance.
āMy God did not make a mistake,ā he said. āAnd so if you were gay, my God did not make a mistake. If you were lesbian my God did not make a mistake. If you were transgender, my God did not make a mistake. And tonight, when I go home to my wife, nothing will deter me from loving my wife ā certainly not if thereās a bill that protects gays, protects lesbians or protects the transgender community.ā
Several of Marylandās gay elected officials testified in favor of the bill. Among them was Sen. Richard Madaleno (D-Montgomery County), a co-sponsor of the bill who has been a longtime advocate for marriage equality in the state. Others included Chevy Chase, Md., Mayor David Loveland andĀ Howard County Register of Wills Byron Macfarlane.
Among Republicans testifying in support of the bill was Sen. Allan Kittleman (R-Howard & Carroll Counties). Kittleman, the former Senate minority leader, initially planned to introduce a civil unions bill as a possible alternate measure to the marriage bill. Two weeks ago, he dropped those plans and announced his enthusiastic support for the marriage measure.
āI stand here as a strong Republican,ā he told the committee, adding that he believes marriage equality is in full keeping with Republican principals of individual freedom.
Sen. Brian Frosh (D-Montgomery County), chair of the committee, said at the start of the hearing that more than 140 people signed up to testify.
Their names, organizational affiliation and information on whether they were for or against the bill werenāt immediately available because the committee did not release a witness list on the day of the hearing.
In a procedure unlike the equally packed hearing for a same-sex marriage bill approved by the D.C. City Council last year, the Judicial Proceedings Committee in Maryland required witnesses to sign up in person to testify on the morning of the hearing, preventing the committee from compiling an advance witness list and releasing it to the media.
Based on the testimony delivered during the day, it appeared that the witnesses were about equally divided between supporters and opponents of the bill. As Frosh and Sen. Lisa Gladen (D-Baltimore City), the committeeās vice chair, calledĀ witnesses to testify, many were not present, indicating that a significant number chose not to wait their turn to speak at a hearing that lasted more than six hours.
Lisa Polyak, a board member and spokesperson for Equality Maryland, the statewide LGBT organization that coordinated testimony in support of the bill, said the group lined up about 48 supporting witnesses. She said others supporting the bill, including a number of same-sex couples, came on their own.
āWe were extremely gratified for all of the families that came out, all of our community partners, and all of the clergy that came out to speak their truth and support us,ā she said. āI donāt think we could have had a better diversity of representation.ā
Among those testifying was Polyakās and her partner, Gita Deaneās daughter, 14-year-old Maya Deane-Polyak, a freshman at Baltimoreās Bryan Mawr High School.
āMy momsā first concern has always been my sister and I,ā said Maya. āThey make sure our every need is met, whether it is helping us with homework, driving us to a friendās house or merely just being there to cheer us up when we are sad ā they do it all and even more.ā
Noting that she has witnessed first-hand examples of how her two moms encounter discrimination because they canāt marry in Maryland, she urged the committee to promptly approve the marriage bill.
āSo I ask you to please consider, consider the fact that you have the power to change my familyās life when you make your decision,ā she said. āI want our moms to be married. You have the power to make that happen.ā
Many of the witnesses opposing the bill said broadening marriage to include same-sex couples would weaken the family structure and harm children. Several said children of same-sex parents donāt do as well in school and show greater signs of emotional problems compared to kids of opposite-sex, married parents. LGBT activists have said those assertions are not supported by impartial studies.
Austin Nimocks, senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative litigation group that challenges same-sex marriage laws throughout the country, testified that restricting marriage to opposite-sex couples insures that children are raised by a āstable family.ā
He said āresponsible procreationā is a key reason why Maryland and other states should not legalize marriage for same-sex couples. By pushing to āredefineā marriage to include gay and lesbian couples āyou are telling people that mothers and fathers donāt matter,ā he told the committee.
In response to questions by committee member Jamie Raskin (D-Montgomery County), a co-sponsor of the marriage bill, Nimocks acknowledged that some same-sex couples may make good parents, saying āyou can find individual circumstances that go against a general rule.ā
But other witnesses opposing the bill said there could be no exceptions to their religious-based belief that child rearing by same-sex parentsĀ is always harmful to children, both psychologically and spiritually.
āThat union of our parents was a sacred right granted to them by almighty God,ā said Timonium, Md., resident Gerard Selby. āGodās design for the human race was that it be procreated by the union of a man and a woman.ā
He added, āWhere do we draw the lines? What comes next? If a man loses his wife to a premature death, shouldnāt he be allowed to marry his daughter, or son, or both?
Leroy Swales, an Oxon Hill, Md., resident who testified last year against the D.C. same-sex marriage bill, told the committee Tuesday that approval of the bill, among other things, would result in Marylandās elementary schools using the book āHeather Has Two Mommies,ā which he called a āpedophile book,ā as a teaching aid for students.
Saying that homosexuality is related to an āelectrical imbalance of the brain,ā he called on the committee to use āscienceā and biblical scriptures as justification for defeating the bill.
District of Columbia
Two charged with assaulting, robbing gay man at D.C. CVS store
Incident occurred after suspects, victim āexchanged wordsā at bar

D.C. police just after 1 a.m. on April 10 arrested two men for allegedly assaulting and robbing a gay man inside a CVS store at 1418 P St., N.W., according to a police report and charging documents filed in D.C. Superior Court.
The charging documents state that the alleged assault and robbery occurred a short time after the three men āexchanged wordsā at the gay bar Number 9, which is located across the street from the CVS.
The arrested men are identified in the charging documents as Marquel Jose Diaz, 27, of Northwest D.C., and Lorenzo Jesse Scafidi, 21, of Elizabeth City, N.C. An affidavit in support of the arrest for Diaz says Diaz and the victim āwere previously in a relationship for a year.ā
Court records show Diaz was charged with Simple Assault, Theft Second Degree, and Possession of a Controlled Substance. The court records show the controlled substance charge was filed by police after Diaz was found to be in possession of a powdered substance that tested positive for cocaine.
Scafidi was charged with Simple Assault and Theft Second Degree, the court records show.
The D.C. police report for the incident does not list it as a suspected hate crime.
The court records show both men pleaded not guilty to the charges against them at a Superior Court arraignment on the day of their arrest on April 10. The records show they were released by a judge while awaiting trial with an order that they āstay awayā from the victim. They are scheduled to return to court for a status hearing on May 21.
The separate police-filed affidavits in support of the arrests of both Diaz and Scafidi each state that the two men and the victim āexchanged wordsā inside the Number 9 bar. The two documents state that both men then entered the CVS store after the victim went to the store a short time earlier.
Scafidi ācame into the CVS shortly after and entered the candy aisle and slammed Complainant 1 [the victim] to the ground causing Complainant 1ās phone to fall out of CP-1ās pocket,ā one of the two affidavits says. It says Scafidi āagain picked up CP-1 and slammed him to the ground.ā
The affidavit in support of Diazās arrest says Diaz also followed the victim to the CVS store after words were exchanged at the bar. It says that after Scafidi allegedly knocked the victim down in the candy aisle Diaz picked up the victimās phone, āswung onā the victim āwhile he was still on the ground,ā and picked up the victimās watch before he and Scafidi fled the scene.
Without saying why, the two arrest affidavits say Diaz and Scafidi returned to the scene and were arrested by police after the victim and at least one witness identified them as having assaulted and robbed the victim.
Attorneys representing the two arrested men did not respond to phone messages from the Washington Blade seeking comment and asking whether their clients dispute the allegations against them.
The victim also did not respond to attempts by the Blade to obtain a comment from him. The police report says the victim is a resident of Fairfax, Va.
District of Columbia
Bowser calls for āextraordinaryā response to reduction in D.C. budget
Impact on city funding for LGBTQ programs and grants unclear

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser on April 15 issued an executive order calling for āextraordinary actions,ā including āsignificant cuts in District Government services,ā to address a decision by Congress to cut the cityās current budget by $1.1 billion.
The nine-page executive order points out that these actions became necessary after the U.S. House of Representatives has so far declined to vote on a free-standing bill approved by the U.S. Senate last month that would restore the $1.1 billion D.C. budget cut initially approved by the House.
In addition to large-scale cuts in city services, the mayoral order says the congressionally imposed city budget cut will bring about city āhiring freezes, financial impacts to employees, reductions and terminations in contracts and grants, and closures of District Government facilities.ā
The order adds, āThese are unprecedented actions given that the District itself adopted and is able to implement a fully balanced budget, but they are necessary due to the Congressional cut to the Districtās budget and its inaction in timely fixing its legislative error.ā
The House adjourned this week on a recess until the end of April, and congressional observers say it is unclear whether the majority Republican House will take up the Senate bill to undo the D.C. budget cut when the House returns from its recess. President Donald Trump has called on the House to approve the bill to restore the full D.C. budget.
Among the D.C. LGBTQ organizations and those providing services to the LGBTQ community that receive D.C. government funding and that could be impacted by the budget cuts are Capital Pride Alliance, which is organizing WorldPride 2025 set to take place in D.C. next month; and Whitman-Walker Health, one of the cityās largest private healthcare organizations that provides medical services for LGBTQ clients.
Also receiving city funding are the Wanda Alston Foundation, which provides housing services for LGBTQ people; and the LGBTQ youth advocacy and services organization SMYAL.
Spokespersons for the four organizations couldnāt immediately be reached to determine if they knew whether the soon-to-be implemented budget cuts would have an impact on the city funding they currently receive.
In response to questions from news reporters during an April 15 press conference call to discuss the Bowser executive order, Jenny Reed, director of the D.C. Office of Budget and Performance Management, said details on specific programs or funding allocations set to be cut would not be known until the mayor submits to the D.C. Council her Supplemental FY 2025 budget along with her proposed FY 2026 budget.
Reed was joined at the press briefing by Lindsey Parker, Mayor Bowserās chief of staff; and Tomas Talamante, director of the Office of Intergovernmental Affairs.
They and other city officials have said the impact of the congressionally imposed city budget cut was expected to be lessened but remain highly problematic by Bowserās decision to invoke a 2009 law that allows the city to increase its own spending without approval by Congress under certain circumstances.
The mayor has said under that law, the city would need to cut its FY 2025 budget by $410 million rather than by $1.1 billion. It couldnāt immediately be determined whether House Republicans, who initiated the requirement that the D.C. budget be cut by $1.1 billion, would challenge the mayorās plan to invoke the 2009 law to reduce the size of the budget cut.
āWithout the ability to fully execute the Fiscal Year 2025 budget as adopted and approved by the District, this gap will force reductions in critical services provided by our largest agencies, including the Metropolitan Police Department and the Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department,ā the mayorās executive order states.
āThe District will continue to work with members of the House of Representatives to urge them to vote to fully restore the Districtās Fiscal year 2025 budget and will continue to work with President Trump to strongly encourage the House of Representatives to take that action,ā the order says.
District of Columbia
LGBTQ budget advocates fight for D.C. resources in a tough fiscal year
‘Trying to preserve life-saving services’ amid $1 billion cut

The months and days leading up to June are especially busy for LGBTQ Washingtonians. For one group, the DC LGBT Budget Coalition, which works year-round to ensure LGBTQ residents are represented and financially supported by the D.C. government, this time of year is their Super Bowl. Beginning in April, the D.C. Council and Mayorās Office hold budget hearings for the next fiscal year.
With D.C.’s budget now under review, the Washington Blade spoke with Heidi Ellis, coordinator of the DC LGBT Budget Coalition, about the groupās top priorities and their push to ensure continued support for queer communities.
āThe LGBTQ Budget Coalition was founded in 2020 at the height of the pandemic, as a way for the community to work together to advocate for key funding and policy changes,ā Ellis said. āWe recognized we were stronger together. A lot of groups are often pitted against each other for resources and dollars. This coalition was founded out of a need for unity. Since then, weāve successfully advocated for more than $20 million in dedicated LGBTQ investments.ā
In addition to coordinating the coalition, Ellis is the founder and CEO of HME Consulting & Advocacy, a firm that helps build coalitions and advance policy initiatives that address intersectional issues in the LGBTQ community. One of its most powerful tools, she explained, is direct outreach through community surveys.
āWe actually do community surveys to see what people need and whatās top of mind,ā Ellis said. āOf course, we also pay attention to the broader political landscape ā like the current threats to HIV funding. That helps us prioritize.ā
Because the coalition is comprised of more than 20 organizations across various sectors āhealthcare, housing, community organizing ā Ellis said its diversity enables it to connect grassroots needs to potential policy solutions.
āOur coalition includes service providers, community groups, health and housing advocates-folks who are deeply plugged into whatās happening on the ground,ā she said. āThey help determine our direction. We know we donāt represent every queer person in D.C., but our coalition reflects a wide range of identities and experiences.ā
The insights gathered through those surveys ultimately inform the coalitionās annual budget proposal, which is submitted to the Council and mayor.
āThatās how we got to our FY26 priorities,ā she said. āThis year, more than ever, weāre fighting to protect what weāve already secured ā funding and policies weāve had to fight for in the past. We know thereās concern around this budget.ā
One of the challenges this year is that the D.C. governmentās operating budget and some of its legislation must be approved by Congress. With a projected decline in tax revenue and a Republican-controlled Congress that has historically opposed LGBTQ funding, the Coalition has had to think strategically.
āEven before the situation on the Hill, the CFO projected lower revenue,ā Ellis said. āThat meant cuts to social programs were already coming. And now, with the $1 billion slashed from D.C.ās budget due to the continuing resolution, weāre not only fighting for D.C.ās budget and autonomy, but also trying to preserve life-saving services. Our message is simple: Donāt forget about queer people.ā
This yearās proposal doesnāt include specific dollar figures. Instead, the Coalition outlines five funding priority areas: Healthcare, Employment & Economic Equity, Housing, Safety & Community Support, and Civil Rights.
Why no exact amounts? Ellis said itās because not all solutions are financial.
āSome of our asks donāt require new funding. Others build on existing programs-weāre asking whether the current use of funds is the most effective. Weāre also proposing policy changes that wouldnāt cost extra but could make a real difference. Itās about using what we have better,ā she said.
When drafting the proposal, the Coalition tries to prioritize those with the most pressing and intersecting needs.
āOur perspective is: If we advocate for the most vulnerable, others benefit too,ā Ellis said. āTake LGBTQ seniors. Some may have done well in life but now face housing insecurity or struggle to access affordable healthcare. Many in our coalition are elders who fought on the frontlines during the AIDS epidemic. They bring critical historical context and remind us that Black and brown communities bore the brunt of that crisis.ā
āI love our coalition because it keeps us accountable to the moment,ā she added. āIf we center those most marginalized, we can make an impact that lifts everyone.ā
In addition to healthcare and housing, safety remains a top concern. The Coalition has fought to maintain funding for the Violence Prevention and Response Team (VPART), a city-supported group that includes MPD, community-based organizations, and the Mayorās Office of LGBTQ Affairs. VPART responds to crimes affecting the LGBTQ community and connects victims to legal, healthcare, and housing services.
āWeāve pushed to make VPART more proactive, not just reactive,ā Ellis said. āThe funding weāve secured has helped survivors get the support they need. Cutting that funding now would undo progress weāre just beginning to see.ā
At the end of the day, Ellis emphasized that this process is about far more than spreadsheets.
āA budget is a moral document,ā she said. āIf weāre not represented, youāre telling us our lives donāt matter at a time when we need protection the most. When people canāt get food, medicine, housing ā that has a devastating impact. These are vital services.ā
The DC LGBT Budget Coalition is urging residents to support a letter-writing campaign to D.C. Council members and the mayor. You can send a letter here: https://actionnetwork.org/letters/fully-fund-dcs-lgbtq-communities
Read the full FY26 budget proposal here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bTrENnc4ZazJTO6LPrQ3lZkF02QNIIf1/view
-
The White House5 days ago
White House does not ‘respond’ to reporters’ requests with pronouns included
-
District of Columbia2 days ago
Reenactment of 1965 gay rights protest at White House set for April 17
-
Hungary2 days ago
Hungarian MPs amend constitution to ban public LGBTQ events
-
Maryland2 days ago
FreeState Justice: Transgender activist āhijackedā Mooreās Transgender Day of Visibility event