Connect with us

News

Hearing set in anti-gay bias lawsuit against Exxon Mobil

Fact-finding conference to determine if oil-and-gas giant discriminated in job hiring

Published

on

Exxon, Mobil, gay news, Washington Blade

A hearing is set for Tuesday over a lawsuit contending anti-gay bias at Exxon Mobil. (Photo of Exxon sign by Ildar Sagdejev, photo of Mobil sign by Terence Ong; courtesy Wikimedia Commons).

An LGBT group that has sued oil-and-gas giant Exxon Mobil on the grounds of alleged anti-gay bias in hiring practices will get its hearingĀ on Tuesday.

In the case of Freedom to Work v. Exxon Mobil, the IllinoisĀ agencyĀ charged with enforcing stateĀ civil rights law has set Oct. 21Ā at 10:30 am Central Time for a fact-finding conferenceĀ at Vandalia City Hall, according to a redacted noticeĀ from the LGBT group obtained Sunday by the Washington Blade.

It’ll be the first time during the entire controversy that startedĀ in 1998 when Exxon merged withĀ Mobil and deleted the company’s LGBT protections that the company has had to answer in a legal proceeding questions about itsĀ lack of explicit non-discrimination protections.

In May 2013, Freedom to Work filed a complaint with the Illinois Department of Human Rights alleging Exxon Mobil engaged in anti-gay discrimination in hiring practices for an Illinois job posting, which would be a violation of state law. As restitution, the lawsuit seeks enumerated protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity in the company’s equal employment opportunity policy.

Although the state initially threw out the lawsuit in January, the case was back on in July after the Illinois Human Rights Commission overturned that decision and remanded the case for additional review.

According to the notice, the fact-finding conference is an investigative forum “intended to define the issues, determine which facts are undisputed, obtain evidence and ascertain where there is a basis for a negotiated settlement of charge.” The investigator assigned to the case is Krista Sherrock, whose contact number information was redacted by Freedom to Work in the notice.

The investigator conducts the fact-finding conference, the notice states, and determines which persons should be present. During the conference, the investigator reads an opening statement as well as the charge and questions the participants.

Both Tico Almeida, president of Freedom to Work, as well representatives of Exxon Mobil — Kimberly Cunningham, who works in the company’s internal legal department, and Dona Steadman, a human resources adviser — are required to appear at the hearing, according to the notice.

As previously reported, the Chicago-based international law firm Seyfarth Shaw is designated as counsel for Exxon Mobil. The case is being handled for the law firm by attorney Gerald Maatman.

Representing Freedom to Work is Peter Romer-Friedman, an attorney with Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC.

“It is encouraging that the Illinois Department of Human Rights is now investigating the merits of Freedom to Work’s discrimination charge,” Romer-Friedman said. “We are confident the evidence will show Exxon broke the law and that Exxon must change its policies so that LGBT workers are no longer subject to harmful discrimination. After a one year delay due to an erroneous dismissal of the case on technical grounds, we look forward to working with the Department to finally hold Exxon accountable.”

Neither Exxon Mobil nor Seyfarth Shaw responded to the Blade’s request to comment on the hearing. A spokesperson for the Illinois Human Rights Department said she was unable to provide to comment on developments of the investigation.

In July, President Obama signed an executive order barring federal contractors from discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, but that directive isn’t expected to take effect until early next year. It remains to be seen whether the executive order or the lawsuit will be responsible for compelling Exxon Mobil to include LGBT protections in its non-discrimination policy.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Kenya

Kenya Red Cross-owned hotel to host anti-LGBTQ conference

Speakers from US, European countries to participate in May 12-17 gathering

Published

on

Plans to host a family values meeting next month in a 5-star hotel in Nairobi that the Kenya Red Cross Society co-owns have sparked an uproar among local queer rights groups.

The groups accuse the Kenya Red Cross of violating its Global Fund commitment of protecting key populations by allowing its Boma Hotel to host an ā€œanti-gender and anti-LGBTQā€ conference. 

Influential guest speakers from the U.S., the Netherlands, Spain, and Poland will preside over the Pan American Conference on Family Values that will take place from May 12-17. The Kenyan advocacy groups say these speakers’ organizations are globally recognized for undermining LGBTQ rights.

ā€œAs the principal recipient of Global Fund in Kenya, hosting this event contradicts (the) Red Cross’s humanitarian mission and threatens the safety and dignity of people living with HIV, women and LGBTQ+ individuals, the communities that Kenya Red Cross Society has long committed to supporting,ā€ the queer rights groups state. 

The LGBTQ groups that have criticized the Kenya Red Cross include Upinde Advocates for Inclusion, the Initiative for Equality and Non-Discrimination, and Gay and Lesbian Coalition of Kenya. They have also launched an online signature collection drive to compel the Kenya Red Cross to withdraw the hotel from hosting the ā€œPromoting and Protecting Family Values in Challenging Timesā€-themed conference.

ā€œThe event’s so-called ‘family values’ narrative is a smokescreen for policies that push hateful legislation and promote death, discrimination, femicide, gender-based violence, and restrict fundamental freedoms across Africa,ā€ the groups said.  

The pro-life Western organizations that are scheduled to participate in the conference include Family Watch International from the U.S., CitizenGo from Spain, the Ordo Luris Institute from Poland, Christian Council International from the Netherlands, the New York-based Center for Family and Human Rights (C-FAM), and the Foundation for American Cultural Heritage. Their local counterparts include the National Council of Churches of Kenya, the Kenya Christian Professionals Forum, the Africa Christian Professionals Forum, and the Evangelical Alliance of Kenya.

C-FAM President Austin Ruse; Family Research Council Vice President for Policy and Government Affairs Travis Wever; Global Life Campaign Executive Director Thomas W. Jacobson; and the Rev. Ricky Chelette, executive director of Living Hope Ministries, Inc., and president of the Institute of Biblical Sexuality are among the U.S. guest speakers. Other participants include Henk Jan van Schthorst, president of Christian Council International’s board of directors, Ordo Luris Institute President Jerzy Kwasniewskie and his colleague, Rafal Dorosinski, director of the group’s Legal Analysis Center.Ā 

The Kenyan groups through their online petition — ā€œTell Red Cross Kenya Not to Give Hate a Platformā€ — has so far raised more than 1,000 of the 10,000 signatures they hope to collect. The petition is addressed to Red Cross Kenya Secretary-General Ahmed Idris and his predecessor, Abbas Gullet, who is the hotel’s director.

ā€œWe call on you to immediately cancel this booking and publicly reaffirm Red Cross’ commitment to human rights, health and inclusivity,ā€ the petition reads. ā€œFailure to act will raise concerns about whether (the) Red Cross can still be trusted by the community to lead with empathy and fight for their rights.ā€ 

The Kenya Red Cross, however, maintains the Boma Hotel is a separate entity, even though public records indicate it is one of the facility’s shareholders.

The LGBTQ groups note the hotel should be a safe space that promotes inclusion, not platforms that enable ā€œharmful gatheringā€ for hate and exclusion by ā€œdangerous groups.ā€   

ā€œBy providing a venue for this event, Red Cross directly enables a platform for hate and discrimination — a stark contradiction to the values of inclusivity, humanity, and nondiscrimination that the organization claims to uphold,ā€ they said. Ā 

The organizations further warn that proceeding to host the conference threatens the relationship between the Red Cross and the marginalized communities who have long depended on the humanitarian organization for support and protection. CitizenGo has nonetheless criticized the LGBTQ groups, which it describes as ā€œradical activist groupsā€ for ā€œtrying to silence a pro-family eventā€ and asked the Kenya Red Cross and the Boma Hotel not to back down.

ā€œThese groups are calling the event ‘hateful’ because it affirms the natural family — marriage between a man and a woman — and the dignity of every human life, including the unborn,ā€ Ann Kioko, the group’s campaign director for Africa and the U.N., said.

Through an online counter signature collection drive, Kioko holds CitizenGo and other groups won’t be intimidated, silenced or apologize to the queer rights groups for defending ā€œour families, our faith and our futureā€.  

ā€œThe real goal of these foreign-funded activist groups is to impose LGBTQ and gender ideologies on Africa — ideologies that have led elsewhere to the confusion of children, the breakdown of family structures and the rise of sexual libertinism that results in abortion, STIs and lifelong emotional and psychological trauma,ā€ Kioko stated.  

Continue Reading

India

Opposition from religious groups prompts Indian Pride group to cancel annual parade

Event was to have taken place in Amritsar on April 27

Published

on

(Washington Blade photo by Ernesto Valle)

Pride Amritsar, a student-led organization in the Indian state of Punjab, earlier this month announced the cancellation of its Pride parade that was scheduled to take place on April 27, citing opposition from certain religious groups.

The event, planned for the Rose Garden in Amritsar, a city revered as a spiritual center of Sikhism, had faced mounting resistance from Sikh religious organizations, including the Nihang Singh faction and the Akal Takht, the faith’s highest temporal authority. These groups labeled the parade as ā€œunnaturalā€ and urged local authorities to deny permission, citing its potential to disrupt the city’s religious sanctity.

In an Instagram post on April 6, Pride Amritsar organizers Ridham Chadha and Ramit Seth elaborated on its mission and the reasons for the cancellation. 

ā€œSince 2019, we have organized peaceful parades and celebrations in Amritsar to connect and uplift the LGBTQIA+ community, with a particular focus on transgender individuals and their rights,ā€ their statement read.

Chadha and Seth highlighted Pride Amritsar efforts in providing guidance, counseling, and job opportunities, which have been met with positive responses. However, due to opposition this year, Pride Amritsar announced the cancellation of the 2025 parade. 

ā€œWe have no intention of harming the sentiments of any religious or political groups,ā€ the statement read. ā€œThe safety of our members is our top priority, and we will take all necessary measures to ensure their protection.ā€

Chadha and Seth spoke with the Washington Blade about their decision to cancel the parade.

They explained that resistance came from both religious and political groups who labeled the parade and its values as anti-Sikh and contrary to Punjabi and Indian cultural norms. Critics specifically objected to the event’s location in Amritsar, a city regarded as a sacred center of Sikhism, arguing that the parade would disrupt its spiritual purity.

Chadha and Seth stressed Pride Amritsar lacks political, financial, or legal support. Composed of students and young professionals, the group organizes the parade biennially, dedicating personal time to advocate for the LGBTQ community.

ā€œWe do it independently, crowdfund the parade and cover the rest with our pockets,ā€ said Seth and Chadha. 

When asked by the Blade why Pride Amritsar did not approach the High Court or local authorities to protect the parade, despite the Supreme Court’s 2018 ruling that decriminalized consensual same-sex sexual relations, Chadha and Seth cited significant barriers.

ā€œPursuing legal action in India requires substantial resources, both financial and temporal,ā€ they explained. 

Chadha and Seth also noted that such action could lead to public shaming and unwanted publicity for participants, potentially harming their careers in Amritsar. They therefore chose not to pursue legal recourse.

Chadha and Seth said Pride Amritsar does not have any plans to hold alternative events.

ā€œWe are still exploring options, but we are likely not holding any events this year,ā€ they said, citing significant harassment that organizers faced and the need for time to plan how to best serve the local LGBTQ community moving forward.

ā€œOur evaluation of what the biggest challenge is has changed after this year,ā€ said Chadha and Seth to the Washington Blade. ā€œThe biggest challenge, by far, seems to be education. We need to educate the community about what the community is, does, and why it exists. Why we do parades. Why we dance. Why calling someone ā€˜chakka’ is harmful. How we actually fit into religion and fall within the guidelines.ā€

Chadha and Seth said organizing the parade in Amritsar since 2019 has been an uplifting experience, despite continued opposition.

ā€œThe moment you join the parade, chant a slogan, or sing a song, it’s transformative,ā€ they said. ā€œFear vanishes, and a sense of freedom takes over.ā€ 

The cancellation of the 2025 Amritsar Pride Parade has sparked concerns among activists in Punjab, as the Indian Express reported. 

The Punjab LGBT Alliance and other groups expressed concern that the decision to cancel the parade may strengthen opposition to future LGBTQ-specific events. 

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

D.C. police seek help in identifying suspect in anti-gay threats case

Victim threatened with assault, called ā€˜faggot’ as he left Capitals game

Published

on

D.C. police are seeking help from the public in identifying a male suspect whose image was captured by a video surveillance camera.

D.C. police are seeking help from the public in identifying a male suspect whose image was captured by a video surveillance camera after he allegedly shouted anti-gay slurs and threatened to assault a man at 6th and H Streets, N.W. on March 20 at about 9:54 p.m.

A police report says the victim told police the incident took place shortly after he exited the nearby Capital One Arena where he had attended a Washington Capitals hockey game.

The police report says the incident began when the victim saw the suspect yell a racist slur at a person behind the victim and started to berate a valet operator.

ā€œSuspect 1 then turned his attention to Victim 1 and called him a ā€˜faggot’ among other homophobic slurs,ā€ the report says. It says the victim then used his phone to record the suspect, prompting the suspect to walk away before returning and ā€œsnatchingā€ the phone from the victim’s hand.

ā€œSuspect 1 walked several feet as Victim 1 followed, requesting his phone back,ā€ the report continues. ā€œSuspect 1 stopped and turned to Victim 1 and while yelling other obscenities exclaimed ā€˜if you keep recording, I’m going to kick your ass.ā€™ā€ The report concludes by saying the victim was able to recover his phone.

It lists the incident as a ā€œThreats To Do Bodily Harmā€ offense that is a suspected hate crime.

ā€œAnyone who can identify this suspect or has knowledge of this incident should take no action but call police at 202-727-9099, or text your tip to the Department’s TEXT TIP LINE at 50411,ā€ according to a separate police statement released April 23.

The statement says police currently offer an award of up to $1,000 to anyone who can provide information that leads to an arrest and indictment of the person or persons responsible for a crime committed in D.C.

D.C. police spokesperson Tom Lynch said the case has been under investigation since the incident occurred on March 20. He said the video image of the suspect, most likely obtained from a security camera from a nearby business, was released to the public as soon as it was obtained and processed through the investigation.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular