Connect with us

News

¿Quién es Juan García Rodríguez, el nuevo cardenal cubano, y qué piensa de la comunidad LGBTI+?

El arzobispo de La Habana no ha hecho declaraciones sobre los derechos LGBTI+

Published

on

En 2018 el nuevo cardenal cubano, Juan García Rodríguez (camisa azul), firmó una carta colectiva que criticaba la intención de definir el matrimonio como “la unión de dos personas”. (Foto tomada de santegidio.org)

Nota del editor: Tremenda Nota es el medio socio del Washington Blade en Cuba. Esta nota salió originalmente en su sitio web el 1 de septiembre de 2019.

El papa Francisco anunció este domingo en la plaza de San Pedro que próximamente se crearán 13 cardenales y uno de ellos será el cubano Juan de la Caridad García Rodríguez, arzobispo de San Cristóbal de La Habana desde 2016. 

El nuevo cardenal tiene 71 años y nació en Camagüey, sede arzobispal que desempeñó como titular desde 2002, antes de sustituir a Jaime Ortega Alamino en el arzobispado habanero. 

García Rodríguez se contará por su edad entre los más de 100 cardenales menores de 80 años que participarían en un cónclave para la elección de otro papa si fuera necesario. 

Tres años atrás, cuando sustituyó a Ortega, el arzobispo dijo a la prensa que esperaba aumentar los diálogos con el gobierno cubano y contribuir así a que la iglesia católica participara en la educación y los medios de comunicación, además de tener más acceso a las prisiones. 

Al menos en los primeros años de su episcopado no ha conseguido cumplir estas aspiraciones, aunque García Rodríguez mantiene la posición amigable de su predecesor hacia la política cubana que controla el Partido Comunista de Cuba con exclusión de otros grupos. 

El pasado mes de julio, por citar un ejemplo de cautela en su relación con el gobierno, el arzobispado de La Habana prefirió no pronunciarse sobre las acciones de las autoridades para impedir que laicos católicos y periodistas independientes participaran en los funerales del cardenal Ortega. 

Jaime Ortega Alamino, a quien los medios llamaron “el cardenal del deshielo” por su papel mediador en el acercamiento que tuvieron los gobiernos de Cuba y Estados Unidos en 2014, calificó de “antiguos delincuentes, sin nivel cultural, algunos con trastornos psicológicos” a un grupo de disidentes que ocuparon un templo y fueron desalojados por la policía, a solicitud del prelado, días antes de la visita de Benedicto XVI a la Isla en 2012.

Ortega también había negado, en declaraciones realizadas en 2015, que existieran presos políticos en Cuba. 

García Hernández, en cambio, ha evitado declararse sobre estos temas en los últimos años. 

“Por su discreción y centrismo, es la persona menos comprometida en las luchas intestinas de la Iglesia cubana”, dijo el intelectual laico Lenier González Mederos al periodista Mario J. Pentón en los días que tomó posesión el actual arzobispo. 

García Hernández tampoco se pronunció el año pasado sobre la polémica alrededor del matrimonio igualitario que sí generó declaraciones de varios colegas suyos como Dionisio García Ibáñez, arzobispo de Santiago de Cuba, para rechazar el matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo/género y atribuírselo al “imperialismo cultural”, o Wilfredo Pino Estévez, arzobispo de Camagüey, a favor de implementar una unión civil para parejas LGBTI+. 

El nuevo cardenal sí figura entre los firmantes de un mensaje publicado por los obispos cubanos acerca del proyecto de Constitución que presentó el parlamento en 2018. En el documento se criticó la intención de definir el matrimonio como “la unión de dos personas” y se calificó este concepto de “mal fundado y erróneo”. 

Los obispos aseguraron en el texto que no deseaban “menospreciar la dignidad de ninguna persona” y que su posición a favor del matrimonio tradicional “no significa[ba] discriminación”. 

Finalmente, el parlamento modificó la redacción del artículo y optó por una redacción más técnica y neutra que fue rechazada por gran parte de la comunidad LGBTI+, incluso entre los grupos favorables al discurso oficial. 

Durante los debates populares previos al referéndum de la actual Carta Magna cubana, la diputada Mariela Castro Espín, directora del Centro Nacional de Educación Sexual (Cenesex) y activista por los derechos LGBTI+, dijo a la prensa del País Vasco: “Fundamentalistas religiosos están tratando de ‘chantajear al Gobierno cubano con que no van a votar a favor de la Constitución si se deja el artículo relativo al matrimonio entre dos personas'”.

Castro Espín parecía referirse a las iglesias protestantes que dirigieron varias cartas públicas a la Plaza de la Revolución contra el matrimonio igualitario. 

No hay evidencias de que la Iglesia Católica haya intentado influir sobre la redacción final del artículo relacionado con el matrimonio, aunque es probable que sostuviera conversaciones con el gobierno cubano sobre el tema, si se toman en cuenta los antecedentes de mediación política que desempeñó el arzobispado de La Habana en la persona de Jaime Ortega.

El nombramiento de un nuevo cardenal con sede en La Habana, anunciado solo a un mes de la muerte de Ortega, también expresa la voluntad que tiene El Vaticano de mantener su influencia en futuros diálogos con el gobierno cubano.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

National

House Republicans propose steep cuts in federal AIDS budget

Advocacy groups say move would eliminate ‘Ending HIV Epidemic’ initiative

Published

on

The Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative was launched during the administration of President Donald Trump.

The Republican-controlled U.S. House Subcommittee on Labor, Health, and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies approved a spending bill on June 26 that calls for cutting at least $419 million from federal AIDS programs that AIDS activists say would have a devastating impact on efforts to greatly reduce the number of new HIV infections by 2030.

The subcommittee’s proposed bill, which includes billions of dollars in cuts in a wide range of other federal health, education, and human services related programs, is scheduled to be considered by the full House Appropriations Committee on July 10. Officials with AIDS advocacy groups say they are hopeful that the full committee, like last year, will refuse to approve the proposed cuts in the AIDS budget.

The proposed GOP cuts would eliminate $214 million from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s HIV prevention programs, $190 million from the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program, and $15 million from the Department of Health and Human Services Secretary’s Minority HIV/AIDS Program.

Activists say the impact of those cuts would kill the federal government’s Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative, which among other things, calls for reducing the number of new HIV infections in the U.S. by 75 percent by 2025 and by 90 percent by 2030. The activists point out that ironically the Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative was launched during the administration of President Donald Trump.

 “Instead of providing new investments in ending HIV by increasing funding for testing, prevention programs, such as PrEP, and life-saving care and treatment, House Republicans are again choosing to go through a worthless exercise of cutting programs that the American people depend on and will never pass,” said Carl Schmid, executive director of the HIV + Hepatitis Policy Institute.

“While we vigorously fight these cuts, we look forward to working with the entire Congress in a bipartisan fashion on spending bills that can actually become law,” Schmid said in a statement.

 Schmid noted that the bill also includes provisions known as “policy riders” that would take away rights and protections from women, such as access to birth control and abortion, and for minorities, including LGBTQ people.

According to a statement released by the office of Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), who is the ranking minority member of the House Appropriations Committee, one of the policy riders would “block the Biden administration’s policies to ensure nondiscrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation.’  The statement says another policy rider would “prevent policies or programs intended to promote diversity, equality, or inclusion.”

Most political observers believe the Democratic-controlled U.S. Senate would also kill the GOP proposed policy riders and cuts in the AIDS budget if the full Republican-controlled House were to approve the budget bill passed by the appropriations subcommittee.

Rep, Tom Cole (R-Okla.), who serves as chair of the full House Appropriations Committee, released a statement on June 27 defending the  subcommittee’s bill and its proposed spending cuts. “The bill provides appropriate and fiscally responsible funding to ensure these departments can continue to perform their core missions while also acknowledging the fiscal realities facing our nation,” he said.

“Importantly, the bill pushes back on the Biden administration’s out-of-touch progressive policy agenda, preventing this White House from finalizing or implementing controversial rules or executive orders,” Cole said in his statement. “It also preserves long standing bipartisan policy provisions protecting the right to life.”

Continue Reading

Virginia

Man went on ‘homophobic rant’ inside Va. pub that displayed Pride flags

Suspect arrested on charges of public intoxication, assaulting police officer

Published

on

Justin Wayne Hendricks was arrested in the case. (Photo courtesy of the Fairfax County Adult Detention Center)

The Hawk & Griffin British Pub located in Vienna, Va.,  posted a message on Facebook last week saying a man was arrested after going on a “homophobic rant” inside the pub on June 28 when he saw that LGBTQ Pride flags were displayed at the pub for Pride month.

“Last night we had an incident here at the pub when a man came off the street to accost patrons in our beer garden because of our flags displayed for pride month,” the Hawk & Griffin Facebook posting says. “He then spit on our windows and came inside to confront our staff and patrons with homophobic rants,” the posting continues.

“Our manager and staff handled the situation very professionally and police were called to investigate and later arrested a man a couple of blocks away,” the message says. “We want to thank the Vienna Police Department for their quick response. We are and will continue to be community focused and we will never stop working to create and maintain a place of inclusion and tolerance,” the statement concludes.

Vienna police charged Justin Wayne Hendricks, of no known address, with misdemeanor counts of being “drunk in public” and  providing false identification to a police officer and with a felony count of assault on a police officer. A police spokesperson said Hendricks was also found to be in violation of an outstanding arrest warrant from Alexandria, Va., related to a prior charge of failing to register as a sex offender.

The spokesperson, Juan Vazquez, said Hendricks is currently being held without bond at the Fairfax County Adult Detention Center. Online records for the Fairfax County General District Court show that Hendricks is scheduled to appear at a preliminary hearing on Oct. 9.

“On Friday, June 28, around 9:28 p.m. the Vienna Police Department responded to reports of an intoxicated individual threatening customers of the Hawk & Griffin,” a Vienna police statement says. “Upon the arrival of the officers the individual had already left the premises but was promptly located at an address nearby,” according to the statement.

The statement adds that Hendricks was subsequently charged with being drunk in public, providing false information about his identity to police, and assault on a police officer along with being served with the outstanding warrant related to the prior charge in Alexandria of failing to register as a sex offender.

Details of the prior sex offender charge couldn’t immediately be obtained from online court records. However, the online records show that Hendricks has at least a dozen or more prior arrests between 2014 and 2023 on charges including public intoxication, trespassing, and failing to register as a sex offender.

Police spokesperson Vazquez said it would be up to prosecutors with the office of the Fairfax County Commonwealth’s Attorney to determine if a subsequent hate crime related charge would be filed in the case.

Continue Reading

Politics

HRC slams White House over position opposing gender affirming surgeries for minors

‘Biden administration is flat wrong on this’

Published

on

Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson issued a strong rebuke on Tuesday of the Biden-Harris administration’s position opposing gender affirming surgeries for minors.

The New York Times reported on June 28 that the White House, which broadly supports making medical interventions available for transgender youth, had expressed opposition to surgeries for patients under 18, having previously declined to take a specific position on the question.

“Health care decisions for young people belong between a patient, their family, and their health care provider. Trans youth are no exception,” Robinson responded. 

“The Biden administration is flat wrong on this. It’s wrong on the science and wrong on the substance. It’s also inconsistent with other steps the administration has taken to support transgender youth. The Biden administration, and every elected official, need to leave these decisions to families, doctors and patients—where they belong,” she added. “Although transgender young people make up an extremely small percentage of youth in this country, the care they receive is based on decades of clinical research and is backed by every major medical association in the U.S. representing over 1.3 million doctors.”

Robinson said the “administration has committed to fight any ban on healthcare for transgender youth and must continue this without hesitation—the entire community is watching.” 

“No parent should ever be put in the position where they and their doctor agree on one course of action, supported by the overwhelming majority of medical experts, but the government forbids it,” she added.

HRC is a prominent backer of Biden’s 2024 reelection campaign, having pledged $15 million to support efforts in six battleground states. The organization has a strong relationship with the White House, with the president and first lady headlining last year’s National Dinner.

A White House spokesperson declined to respond to Robinson’s statement.

Campaign for Southern Equality President Allison Scott also issued a statement.

“This is a cowardly statement from an administration that promised to support transgender people. It is a troubling concession to the right-wing assault on transgender Americans, falling for their false narratives about surgical care and betraying a commitment to equality and trust in the medical community,” said Scott.

“Let’s be very, very clear: Government has no business inserting itself into private medical decisions that should be exclusively between patients, their providers, and the patients’ parent or guardian,” Scott added.

“It is dangerous to begin endorsing categorical bans or limits on healthcare, and there is no justification for restricting transgender youth’s access to the very same care that many cisgender youth receive every year — that’s literally the definition of discrimination,” Scott concluded. “We demand the Biden administration retract this thoughtless statement and work to undo its damage.” 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular