India
Indian Supreme Court rules against marriage equality
Oral arguments in case took place earlier this year

The Indian Supreme Court of India on Tuesday issued its long-awaited marriage equality ruling.
A five-judge constitutional bench led by Chief Justice Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud in a 3-2 verdict against recognizing the constitutional validity of same-sex marriages in India. The country’s top court said Parliament must decide whether to extend marriage rights to same-sex couples.
The Supreme Court recognized the court cannot make laws, but can only interpret them.
Chandrachud at the beginning of the ruling said the doctrine of separation of powers means that each of the three branches of the state performs a distinct function and therefore no other branch can function any other’s function. Chandrachud mentioned Section 4 of the Special Marriage Act is unconstitutional because it is not sufficiently inclusive. The Supreme Court said either the Special Marriage Act needs to be struck down or read down.
The Supreme Court recognized that if the Special Marriage Act is struck down, it will take the country to the pre-independence era.
“If the court takes the second approach and reads words into the Special Marriage Act, it will be taking up the role of the legislature,” said Chandrachud. “The court is not equipped to undertake such an exercise of reading meaning into the statute.”
The Special Marriage Act of 1954 is a law with provisions for civil unions for Indians and Indian nationals who live abroad, regardless of religion or faith followed by either party. The Special Marriage Act allows people of two different religions to marry.
Section 4 has some provisions: Neither of the parties should have a living spouse, both parties should be capable of giving consent and should be mentally competent at the time of marriage and the parties shall not be within the prohibited degree of relations under their law. The male party must be at least 21-years-old and the female party must be at least 18-years-old.
Chandrachud noted the court must be careful not to enter into the legislative domain. Chandrachud said Parliament must decide whether a change to the Special Marriage Act is needed.
“The right to enter into a union includes the right to choose one’s partner and the right to recognition of that union,” said Chandrachud. “A failure to recognize such associations will result in discrimination against queer couples.”
Chandrachud said that for the full enjoyment of such relationships, such unions need recognition and there cannot be denial of basic goods and services. The state can indirectly infringe upon freedom if it does not recognize the same.
Chandrachud also noted a person’s gender is not the same as their sexuality. He said the law recognizes a transgender person’s marriage if their partner is heterosexual. Chandrachud said a union between a trans man and a trans woman, or vice versa, can be registered under the Special Marriage Act because a trans person can be in a heterosexual relationship.
The Supreme Court recognized queer persons cannot be discriminated against. The court said that the material benefits and services flowing to heterosexual couples and denied to queer couples violate their fundamental rights.
On adoption issues, Chandrachud said the Central Adoption Resource Authority has exceeded its authority in barring unmarried couples.
CARA oversees the adoption of children in India. It functions under the Women and Child Development and it is authorized to regulate and monitor inter-country and in-country adoptions.
Chandrachud said the difference between married couples and unmarried couples has no reasonable nexus with CARA’s objective to ensure the best interests of the child. The court said it cannot be assumed that unmarried couples are not serious about their relationship.
The Supreme Court refused to strike down the Foreign Marriage Act of 1969, which deals with the recognition of marriage of Indian citizens outside the country.
Chandrachud and Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul said queer couples have a fundamental right to seek legal recognition of their union. The other three judges, Justices Shripathi Ravindra Bhat, Hima Kohli and Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, held queer couples cannot claim a right to recognition of their union in the absence of a statutory enactment.
While giving direction to the central; state and Union Territory governments, Chandrachud said that queer community should not be discriminated against. He also noted the government should ensure there is no discrimination in access to goods and services, sensitize the public about queer rights, create a hotline for the queer community, create safe houses for queer couples and ensure intersex children are not forced to undergo operations.
Chandrachud also directed police to not harass queer people by summoning them to police station solely to enquire about their sexual identity, not forcing queer persons to return to their birth family. Chandrachud said authorities should conduct a preliminary inquiry before registering a First Information Report, or FIR, against a queer couple over their relationship.
“Truly disappointed by today’s verdict. We are exactly where we started,” said Harish Iyer, a prominent LGBTQ activist in India and one of the plaintiffs in the marriage equality case. “It’s just one topsy turvy ride with no significance.”
Anjali Gopalan, another plaintiff,, told the Asian News Agency she has been fighting for a long time and will keep doing so.
“Regarding adoption also nothing was done, what the chief justice of India said was very good regarding adoption but it’s disappointing that other justices did not agree,” said Anjali Gopalan. “This is democracy, but we are denying basic rights to our own citizens.”
Karuna Nundy, one of the lawyers in the marriage equality case, told the Asian News Agency there were some opportunities today that she believes have been pushed off to the legislators, and the central government has made their stand clear with regards to marriage.
“We hope that their committee will ensure that civil unions are recognized, and concomitants of marriage are then brought into law, at least with regards to civil unions,” said Nundy. “I will also say that Congress and other governments in power in the states have many opportunities to bring into law the recognition of a partner’s rights to make medical decisions because they can legislate on health, they can look at employment nondiscrimination, there is a lot that can be done. If we heard anything that was unanimous it was that queer citizens have rights. Rights of queer citizens must be protected and state governments can protect them”
The Supreme Court Bar Association President Adish Aggarwala reacted to the verdict and welcomed the marriage equality ruling.
“I am happy that the Supreme Court of India has accepted the version of the government of India in which it was argued that the court has no power to give this right of same-sex marriage. It is the only right of the Indian parliament,” Aggarwala told the Asian News Agency. “Today it has been accepted by the honorable Supreme Court.”
“We are happy that the Supreme Court has held that this power cannot be given to the same sex for having a marriage because India is an ancient country,” added Aggarwala. “India has its own values in society. so, by not providingĀ this right, we hail the judgment of the Supreme Court on this aspect.”
Ankush Kumar is a reporter who has covered many stories for Washington and Los Angeles Blades from Iran, India and Singapore. He recently reported for the Daily Beast. He can be reached atĀ [email protected]. He is on Twitter at @mohitkopinion.Ā
India
Opposition from religious groups prompts Indian Pride group to cancel annual parade
Event was to have taken place in Amritsar on April 27

Pride Amritsar, a student-led organization in the Indian state of Punjab, earlier this month announced the cancellation of its Pride parade that was scheduled to take place on April 27, citing opposition from certain religious groups.
The event, planned for the Rose Garden in Amritsar, a city revered as a spiritual center of Sikhism, had faced mounting resistance from Sikh religious organizations, including the Nihang Singh faction and the Akal Takht, the faithās highest temporal authority. These groups labeled the parade as āunnaturalā and urged local authorities to deny permission, citing its potential to disrupt the cityās religious sanctity.
In an Instagram post on April 6, Pride Amritsar organizers Ridham Chadha and Ramit Seth elaborated on its mission and the reasons for the cancellation.
āSince 2019, we have organized peaceful parades and celebrations in Amritsar to connect and uplift the LGBTQIA+ community, with a particular focus on transgender individuals and their rights,ā their statement read.
Chadha and Seth highlighted Pride Amritsar efforts in providing guidance, counseling, and job opportunities, which have been met with positive responses. However, due to opposition this year, Pride Amritsar announced the cancellation of the 2025 parade.
āWe have no intention of harming the sentiments of any religious or political groups,ā the statement read. āThe safety of our members is our top priority, and we will take all necessary measures to ensure their protection.ā
Chadha and Seth spoke with the Washington Blade about their decision to cancel the parade.
They explained that resistance came from both religious and political groups who labeled the parade and its values as anti-Sikh and contrary to Punjabi and Indian cultural norms. Critics specifically objected to the eventās location in Amritsar, a city regarded as a sacred center of Sikhism, arguing that the parade would disrupt its spiritual purity.
Chadha and Seth stressed Pride Amritsar lacks political, financial, or legal support. Composed of students and young professionals, the group organizes the parade biennially, dedicating personal time to advocate for the LGBTQ community.
āWe do it independently, crowdfund the parade and cover the rest with our pockets,ā said Seth and Chadha.
When asked by the Blade why Pride Amritsar did not approach the High Court or local authorities to protect the parade, despite the Supreme Courtās 2018 ruling that decriminalized consensual same-sex sexual relations, Chadha and Seth cited significant barriers.
āPursuing legal action in India requires substantial resources, both financial and temporal,ā they explained.
Chadha and Seth also noted that such action could lead to public shaming and unwanted publicity for participants, potentially harming their careers in Amritsar. They therefore chose not to pursue legal recourse.
Chadha and Seth said Pride Amritsar does not have any plans to hold alternative events.
āWe are still exploring options, but we are likely not holding any events this year,ā they said, citing significant harassment that organizers faced and the need for time to plan how to best serve the local LGBTQ community moving forward.
āOur evaluation of what the biggest challenge is has changed after this year,ā said Chadha and Seth to the Washington Blade. āThe biggest challenge, by far, seems to be education. We need to educate the community about what the community is, does, and why it exists. Why we do parades. Why we dance. Why calling someone āchakkaā is harmful. How we actually fit into religion and fall within the guidelines.ā
Chadha and Seth said organizing the parade in Amritsar since 2019 has been an uplifting experience, despite continued opposition.
āThe moment you join the parade, chant a slogan, or sing a song, itās transformative,ā they said. āFear vanishes, and a sense of freedom takes over.ā
The cancellation of the 2025 Amritsar Pride Parade has sparked concerns among activists in Punjab, as the Indian Express reported.
The Punjab LGBT Alliance and other groups expressed concern that the decision to cancel the parade may strengthen opposition to future LGBTQ-specific events.
India
LGBTQ poets included in Indiaās premier literary festival
Sahitya Akademi seen as mirror of governmentās cultural agenda

Indiaās premier literary institution on March 7 announced it would allow LGBTQ poets to participate in its marquee Festival of Letters in New Delhi.
The Sahitya Akademi, often seen as a mirror of the governmentās cultural agenda, for the first time allowed these poets into a high-profile poetry reading at the Rabindra Bhavan. They shared the stage with more than 700 writers across 50 languages.
Culture and Tourism Minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat kicked off the Festival of Letters with Mahesh Dattani, the acclaimed English-language playwright famed for his provocative works, as the main guest. Dubbed Asiaās grandest literary gathering, the Sahitya Akademi took place over six days under the āIndian Literary Traditionsā theme.
The 2025 Festival of Letters showcased a sweeping range of voices ā young writers, women writers, Dalit authors from marginalized castes, Northeast Indian scribes, tribal poets, and LGBTQ poets ā cementing its reputation as a literary kaleidoscope.
Kalki Subramaniam, a leading transgender rights activist and author, on March 9 chaired a literary session titled āDiscussion on Literary Works of LGBTQ Writers in the 21st Century,ā which spotlighted contemporary queer voices.
āIt was enriching to listen to the profound thoughts of LGBT writers from various parts of the country in their speeches,ā said Subramaniam. āThe session was particularly memorable with the participation of A. Revathi Amma from Tamil Nadu, Reshma Prasad from Bihar, Sanjana Simon from New Delhi, and Devika Devendra Manglamukhi and Shivin from Uttar Pradesh and Aksaya K Rath from Orissa.ā
Subramaniam discussed how global politics shape gender rights and the persistent erasure of trans identity, urging a unified push for solidarity within the LGBTQ community. She stressed the vital need to elevate queer works and writers, casting their voices as essential to the literary vanguard.
āIt was a pleasure to meet great writers from around the country in the festival as well as meet my writer activist friends Sajana Simon and Revathi Amma after a long time,ā said Subramaniam.

The government on March 12, 1954, formally established the Sahitya Akademi. A government resolution outlined its mission as a national entity tasked with advancing Indian literature and upholding rigorous literary standards; a mandate it has pursued for seven decades.
The Sahitya Akademi in 2018 broke ground in Kolkata, hosting the countryās first exclusive gathering of trans writers, a landmark nod to queer voices in Indian literature.
Hoshang Dinshaw Merchant, Indiaās pioneering openly gay poet and a leading voice in the nationās gay liberation movement, on March 9 recited a poem at the Festival of Letters, his verses carrying the weight of his decades-long quest for queer recognition. He later thanked the sessionās chair for welcoming the community, a gesture that underscored the eventās third day embrace of diverse voices.
The Sahitya Akademi in 2024 honored K. Vaishali with the Yuva Puraskar for her memoir āHomeless: Growing Up Lesbian and Dyslexic in India,ā a raw account of navigating queerness and neurodivergence.Ā Vaishali in a post-win interview reflected on Indiaās deep-seated conservatism around sexuality, noting she wrote from a place of relative safety ā an upper-caste privilege that shielded her as she bared her truth. The award, she said, was the Akademiās indelible seal on her lived experience, a validation no one could challenge.
The Sahitya Akademiās inclusion of LGBTQ writers in its main program this year jars with the Bharatiya Janata Party-led governmentās conservative stance, which, in 2023, opposed same-sex marriage in the Supreme Court, arguing it erodes Indian family values. Yet, under Shekhawat, the Sahitya Akademiās spotlight on queer voices at the Rabindra Bhavan suggests it could be a tentative crack in a regime typically rooted in tradition.
The Festival of Letters hosted a translatorsā meeting on March 10, spotlighting P. Vimalaās 2024 award-winning Tamil translation of Nalini Jameelaās āAutobiography of a Sex Worker,ā a work steeped in marginalized voices that include queer perspectives.
This platform gained significant support from the BJP-led government, with Shekhawat securing a 15 percent budget increase to ā¹47 crore ($5.63 million) in 2024. In Tamil Nadu state, however, Dravida Munnetra Kazhagamās Chief Minister Muthuvel Karunanidhi Stalin, has long opposed such cross-linguistic efforts, fearing dilution of Tamil identity amid decades of anti-Hindi sentiment ā a tension the Sahitya Akademiās inclusive showcase sought to bypass.
āThe Akademi is very inclusive and has a friendly festival ambience,ā Subramaniam told the Washington Blade.
India
LGBTQ Indians remain vulnerable to dating app scammers
Gay man in Mumbai lost nearly $11K in 2024

Swiping right has become a pricey trap for many in India, where Grindr and other dating apps serve as stalking grounds for scammers spinning fake profiles, sob stories, and shattered promises. This deception hits the LGBTQ community hardest, with reports indicating hundreds of people are duped each year.
The modus operandi of these scams unfolds when an LGBTQ user connects with a match on Grindr or Tinder, someone claiming to be from the U.S. or Europe, and the texts spark a flawless romance, until a frantic call shatters the illusion. Theyāve flown to India to meet them, they say, but customs officials at the airport have detained them for carrying wads of foreign cash. A desperate plea follows: Send money to settle fines, with a hollow vow to repay once releasedāa vow that vanishes the moment the payment lands.
Although dating apps have tightened policies to shield usersāMatch Group, Tinderās parent company, rolled out a campaign across Tinder, Hinge, Match, Plenty of Fish, and Meetic with in-app tips to spot scamsāfraud persists. Delhi Police on Jan. 11 busted a gang that targeted gay men on Tinder, luring them with fake profiles promising shared desires, then holding them hostage to extort cash. A minor was among the five people who authorities arrested.
Though India decriminalized homosexuality in 2018, lingering social stigma still marks LGBTQ people as prime targets for dating app scammers.
Noida police in Uttar Pradesh state in 2020 dismantled a gang that honey-trapped at least 10 professionals on a gay dating app, robbing two of them of $500 and $1,700 respectively. Gurugram police in Haryana, a bustling tech and finance hub, that same year nabbed another gang that preyed on more than 50 users of the same app.
Scammers often dig deep, coaxing out home addresses, job details, and family ties from their targetsāsometimes with an accomplice who turns violent, assaulting the victim. Activists, however, note most of them donāt come forward to the police, silenced by Indiaās staunchly conservative mores that allow catfishers to slip away and target more people unchecked.
A 28-year-old gay man in Mumbai in March 2024 fell prey to a dating app scam, losing nearly $11,000 to a man posing as a Texas-based doctor.
After striking up a friendship online, the scammer promised an expensive watch as a giftāonly to call the next day, claiming heād been detained at Delhiās airport for carrying a hefty sum of foreign currency. Moments later, a supposed customs officer named Priya demanded $859 in taxes to secure his release. What began as a single payment spiraled into a financial abyss, with the victim funnelling roughly $11,000 in a month, the Indian Express reported.
āThese incidents have grabbed headlines recently. Scammers create fake profiles, build trust with their targets, and then hit them with extortion demands, threatening to out them to family or friends, said Ankit Bhuptani, an LGBTQ activist who founded Queer Hindu Alliance. āItās a cruel twist of the knife, preying on the fear of societal rejection that still lingers despite legal progress.ā
āEven though the Supreme Court struck down parts of Section 377 in 2018, decriminalizing homosexuality, the reality on the ground is that acceptance isnāt universal,ā added Bhuptani. āFamilies and communities can still be harsh, and these scammers weaponize that vulnerability. The fact that arrests have been madeālike those recent busts in Ghaziabad and Noidaāshows the police are acting, but the persistence of these scams tells us we have got a long way to go.ā
Bhuptani noted that a mix of technological, societal, and legal challenges fuels these scams. He said scammers thrive because dating apps can be a Wild Westāfake accounts are easy to set up, and AI tools make them even more convincing.
āI have heard of cases where victims lost lakhs (thousands of US dollars), like that guy in Ghaziabad who was blackmailed for 1.4 lakhs ($1,700) after being filmed in a compromising situation. Itās predatory and shameless,ā said Bhuptani. āThe emotional toll is just as bad as the financial hitāimagine the terror of being outed in a society where many still see being gay as taboo.ā
Bhuptani argued Indiaās legal framework is primed to tackle dating app scams, pointing to constitutional protectionsāArticle 14ās equality guarantee and Article 15ās anti-discrimination shield the Navtej Johar ruling, which decriminalized homosexuality in 2018, bolstered. He noted that blackmail and extortion already fall under Indian penal code Sections 383 and 384, while the IT Act can pin scammers for online fraud and identity theft.
āThe problem isnāt the laws; itās enforcement and awareness. Police need better training to handle queer-specific cases with sensitivity, and dating apps must step upāthink stricter verification, AI-flagging of suspicious profiles, and user education on spotting red flags,ā said Bhuptani. āBut laws alone wonāt fix this. Societyās got to shift. As long as being LGBTQ carries a stigma, scammers will have leverage. We need campaignsāloud, bold onesāpushing acceptance, normalizing queer identities, and making it clear that outing someone is not a weapon that works anymore.ā
Pune police, meanwhile, on Feb. 27 filed an First Information Report against a gang that blackmailed a gay man on a dating app, bleeding him of $1,248 over five months.
-
Opinions22 hours ago
David Hoggās arrogant, self-indulgent stunt
-
U.S. Federal Courts5 days ago
Federal judge blocks Trump passport executive order
-
Federal Government20 hours ago
HHS to retire 988 crisis lifeline for LGBTQ youth
-
Books5 days ago
āPronoun Troubleā reminds us that punctuation matters